This blog post details a completely free and self-hosted blogging setup using Obsidian for writing, Hugo as the static site generator, GitHub for hosting the repository, and Cloudflare for DNS, CDN, and HTTPS. The author describes their workflow, which involves writing in Markdown within Obsidian, using a designated folder synced with a GitHub repository. Hugo automatically rebuilds and deploys the site whenever changes are pushed to the repository. This combination provides a fast, flexible, and cost-effective blogging solution where the author maintains complete control over their content and platform.
This blog post details how the author hosts their blog, surprisingly, on a Nintendo Wii. They leverage the Wii's homebrew capabilities to run a lightweight web server, specifically lighttpd, serving statically generated content built with Hugo. The author chose the Wii for its low power consumption and as a fun, quirky challenge. They overcame obstacles like limited storage by using an SD card and slow CPU by pre-rendering the site. The post also touches on the process of setting up the web server and the limitations of the Wii as a web server.
Hacker News users generally praised the author's ingenuity and technical skill in hosting a blog on a Wii. Several commenters pointed out the limitations of the Wii's hardware, questioning the practicality and performance of such a setup, particularly regarding RAM and CPU. Some discussed the inherent coolness factor and nostalgic appeal of using outdated hardware for modern tasks. A few users shared similar experiences with repurposing old hardware, while others offered suggestions for improving the setup, including using a different operating system or optimizing the blog for the Wii's limited resources. The overall sentiment was one of admiration and playful curiosity, appreciating the unconventional approach to web hosting.
Side projects offer a unique kind of satisfaction distinct from professional work. They provide a creative outlet free from client demands or performance pressures, allowing for pure exploration and experimentation. This freedom fosters a "flow state" of deep focus and enjoyment, leading to a sense of accomplishment and rejuvenation. Side projects also offer the opportunity to learn new skills, build tangible products, and rediscover the inherent joy of creation, ultimately making us better, more well-rounded individuals, both personally and professionally.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's sentiment about the joys of side projects. Several shared their own experiences with fulfilling side projects, emphasizing the importance of intrinsic motivation and the freedom to explore without pressure. Some pointed out the benefits of side projects for skill development and career advancement, while others cautioned against overworking and the potential for side projects to become stressful if not managed properly. One commenter suggested that the "zen" feeling comes from the creator's full ownership and control, a stark contrast to the often restrictive nature of client work. Another popular comment highlighted the importance of setting realistic goals and enjoying the process itself rather than focusing solely on the outcome. A few users questioned the accessibility of side projects for those with limited free time due to family or other commitments.
To write blog posts that developers will actually read, focus on providing clear, concise, and practical information. Prioritize code examples, concrete solutions, and a logical flow that mirrors the developer's problem-solving process. Avoid unnecessary jargon, flowery language, and long introductions. Instead, get straight to the point, explain the "why" behind the "how," and use visuals like diagrams and screenshots to illustrate complex concepts. Finally, ensure your code is functional, well-formatted, and easily testable by readers. This approach respects the developer's time and provides immediate value, making your blog post a useful resource they'll appreciate and share.
HN commenters generally praised the article for its practical advice on writing for a technical audience. Several highlighted the importance of clarity, conciseness, and providing concrete examples, echoing the article's points. Some suggested additional tips, like linking to relevant resources and using clear diagrams. One commenter appreciated the focus on empathy for the reader and understanding their context. A few debated the value of analogies, with some finding them helpful while others considered them distracting or potentially misleading. The emphasis on respecting the reader's time and intelligence was a recurring theme throughout the comments.
The post analyzes which personal blogs are most frequently linked on Hacker News, revealing a preference for technically-focused, long-form content. It identifies Paul Graham's blog as the most popular by a significant margin, followed by blogs from other prominent figures in the tech and startup world like Steve Yegge, Joel Spolsky, and John Carmack. The analysis uses a dataset of Hacker News submissions and ranks the blogs based on total link counts, highlighting the enduring influence of these authors and their insights within the Hacker News community.
Commenters on Hacker News largely discussed the methodology used in the linked article to determine popular personal blogs. Several users pointed out potential flaws, such as excluding comments and only considering submissions, which could skew the results towards prolific posters rather than genuinely popular blogs. Some questioned the definition of "personal blog" and suggested alternative methods for identifying them. Others noted the absence of certain expected blogs and the inclusion of some that didn't seem to fit the criteria. A few commenters also shared their personal experiences with Hacker News and blog promotion. The overall sentiment was one of cautious interest, with many acknowledging the limitations of the analysis while appreciating the effort.
Kevin Quirk argues against using Twitter threads for substantive content, advocating for blog posts instead. He points out Twitter's ephemeral nature, poor searchability, lack of control over formatting and content presentation, and the difficulty of revising or updating information. A blog, in contrast, offers permanence, improved discoverability through search engines, greater control over formatting and multimedia inclusion, and the ability to easily edit and update. This creates a superior reading experience and allows creators to build a lasting, searchable body of work that they own and control, unlike content trapped within the walled garden of a social media platform.
Hacker News users generally agree with the author's premise that blog posts are superior to Twitter threads for conveying complex ideas. Several commenters point out the ephemeral nature of Twitter content and the difficulty of searching or referencing it later. The improved formatting, editing capabilities, and permanence of blogs are highlighted as key advantages. Some users mention the benefit of owning your content on a personal platform rather than relying on a third-party service. A few dissenting opinions suggest Twitter threads can be effective for quick thoughts and reaching a wider audience, but acknowledge blogs are better for in-depth analysis. The lack of comments/likes on personal blogs is mentioned as a potential drawback, though others counter that this allows for more focused writing without the pressure of social media engagement.
Even with the rise of AI content generation, blogging retains its value. AI excels at producing generic, surface-level content, but struggles with nuanced, original thought, personal experience, and building genuine connection with an audience. Human bloggers can leverage AI tools to enhance productivity, but the core value remains in authentic voice, unique perspectives, and building trust through consistent engagement, which are crucial for long-term success. This allows bloggers to cultivate a loyal following and establish themselves as authorities within their niche, something AI cannot replicate.
Hacker News users discuss the value of blogging in the age of AI, largely agreeing with the original author. Several commenters highlight the importance of personal experience and perspective, which AI can't replicate. One compelling comment argues that blogs act as filters, curating information overload and offering trusted viewpoints. Another emphasizes the community aspect, suggesting that blogs foster connections and discussions around shared interests. Some acknowledge AI's potential for content creation, but believe human-written blogs will maintain their value due to the element of authentic human voice and connection. The overall sentiment is that while AI may change the blogging landscape, it won't replace the core value of human-generated content.
Learning in public, as discussed in Giles Thomas's post, offers numerous benefits revolving around accelerated learning and career advancement. By sharing your learning journey, you solidify your understanding through articulation and receive valuable feedback from others. This process also builds a portfolio showcasing your skills and progress, attracting potential collaborators and employers. The act of teaching, inherent in public learning, further cements knowledge and establishes you as a credible resource within your field. Finally, the connections forged through shared learning experiences expand your network and open doors to new opportunities.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's premise about the benefits of learning in public. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of how publicly documenting their learning journeys, even if imperfectly, led to unexpected connections, valuable feedback, and career opportunities. Some highlighted the importance of focusing on the process over the outcome, emphasizing that consistent effort and genuine curiosity are more impactful than polished perfection. A few cautioned against overthinking or being overly concerned with external validation, suggesting that the primary focus should remain on personal growth. One user pointed out the potential negative aspect of focusing solely on maximizing output for external gains and advocated for intrinsic motivation as a more sustainable driver. The discussion also briefly touched upon the discoverability of older "deep dive" posts, suggesting their enduring value even years later.
The IndieWeb is a community and movement focused on reclaiming ownership and control of your online identity and content by building and using personal websites. It emphasizes using open web standards and technologies to connect your site to the broader web, allowing for independent publishing, sharing, and interaction without relying on centralized platforms. This approach promotes personal expression, data portability, and interconnectedness through a variety of tools and philosophies, empowering individuals to own their online presence.
Hacker News users discussed the merits and challenges of the IndieWeb, prompted by a blog post aggregator. Several commenters expressed appreciation for the concept of owning your own content and controlling your online presence. Some highlighted the technical hurdles and time commitment involved in setting up and maintaining an IndieWeb site, contrasting it with the ease of use of mainstream platforms. Others debated the discoverability of IndieWeb content and whether its decentralized nature hinders its growth. The conversation also touched upon the tension between the IndieWeb's philosophy and the network effects of larger platforms, along with the potential for bridging the gap between the two. A few users shared their personal experiences with the IndieWeb, both positive and negative. The overall sentiment leaned towards cautious optimism, acknowledging the IndieWeb's ideals while recognizing the practical obstacles to widespread adoption.
The core message of "Just Write" is to overcome the paralysis of perfectionism and the fear of judgment by simply starting to write. Don't get bogged down in elaborate outlines or editing; instead, prioritize consistent writing practice to develop your skills and discover your voice. The more you write, the easier it becomes, and the better your writing will be. Embrace imperfection, focus on quantity over quality initially, and view writing as a process of iterative refinement. Over time, this consistent effort will lead to significant improvement and unlock your creative potential.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the core message of "Just Write," emphasizing the importance of consistent writing for skill development and idea generation. Several commenters shared their personal experiences with writing streaks and the positive impact it had on their clarity of thought and ability to articulate ideas. Some cautioned against focusing solely on quantity over quality, suggesting a balance is needed. The idea of lowering the bar for publishing, embracing imperfection, and iterating based on feedback was also discussed. One commenter pointed out the parallels between writing and coding, highlighting the iterative nature of both. Another popular sentiment was the importance of finding a niche and writing about topics that genuinely interest the author.
Website speed significantly impacts user experience and business metrics. Faster websites lead to lower bounce rates, increased conversion rates, and improved search engine rankings. Optimizing for speed involves numerous strategies, from minimizing HTTP requests and optimizing images to leveraging browser caching and utilizing a Content Delivery Network (CDN). Even seemingly small delays can negatively impact user perception and ultimately the bottom line, making speed a critical factor in web development and maintenance.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the article's premise that website speed is crucial. Several commenters shared anecdotes about slow sites leading to lost sales or frustrated users. Some debated the merits of different performance metrics, like "time to first byte" versus "largest contentful paint," emphasizing the user experience over raw numbers. A few suggested tools and techniques for optimizing site speed, including lazy loading images and minimizing JavaScript. Some pointed out the tension between adding features and maintaining performance, suggesting that developers often prioritize functionality over speed. One compelling comment highlighted the importance of perceived performance, arguing that even if a site isn't technically fast, making it feel fast through techniques like skeleton screens can significantly improve user satisfaction.
Even if no one reads your blog, it's still valuable. Writing clarifies your thinking, solidifies your understanding of a topic, and acts as a personal record of your intellectual journey. It can serve as a sandbox for experimenting with ideas, a portfolio to showcase skills, and a springboard for future projects. Essentially, blogging is an act of learning and self-improvement, with the potential bonus of connecting with an audience down the line.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that blogging, even without a large audience, has value. Several highlight the benefits of writing as a way to clarify thinking, consolidate knowledge, and improve writing skills. Some suggest that a blog can serve as a personal knowledge base, searchable archive, or a way to track personal growth. A few practical suggestions include focusing on niche topics and promoting the blog through relevant communities. The idea of writing primarily for oneself, with the potential for an audience as a secondary benefit, is a recurring theme. Some commenters share their own experiences of low-traffic blogs providing unexpected value, like attracting job offers or connecting with like-minded individuals. The overall sentiment is that the intrinsic rewards of blogging often outweigh the pressure of building a large readership.
Alexey Starobinskiy's blog post, "Goodbye, Slopify," details his decision to discontinue Slopify, a side project offering simplified Spotify playlists. He explains that maintaining the service became too time-consuming and costly, especially with the increasing complexity of handling Spotify's API and data updates. Despite initial success and positive user feedback, the project's unsustainability, combined with Starobinskiy's desire to focus on other ventures, ultimately led to its shutdown. He expresses gratitude to his users and reflects on the valuable lessons learned throughout the project's lifespan.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's criticisms of Slopify, echoing frustrations with the app's user experience, bugs, and lack of responsiveness from the developers. Several commenters shared similar experiences with the app crashing, losing data, and encountering unhelpful or non-existent support. Some speculated on technical reasons for the app's poor performance, suggesting issues with Electron or database choices. Others pointed to alternative note-taking apps like Obsidian and Logseq as preferred replacements. A few users expressed disappointment with the apparent abandonment of the project, having previously enjoyed its unique features. The overall sentiment was one of resignation and a search for better alternatives.
Jim Conroy reflects on the tangible benefits of handwriting first drafts. He finds that physically writing slows him down, forcing more deliberate thought and careful crafting of sentences. This process also helps him detach from the distractions of the digital world, fostering deeper focus and more creative exploration of ideas. While acknowledging the eventual need for digital tools, Conroy advocates for the initial act of writing on paper as a way to improve the quality and clarity of thought before transitioning to the computer. He views this method as a valuable practice for refining writing and enriching the overall creative process.
Hacker News commenters generally praised the author's paper-based blogging workflow for its focus and lack of distractions. Several pointed out the similarities to the Zettelkasten method of note-taking, appreciating the tangible and deliberate nature of the process. Some questioned the practicality and scalability of the system, particularly for tasks like editing and sharing, while others suggested digital tools like a remarkable tablet or OCR software could bridge the gap between paper and digital publishing. A few comments also highlighted the romantic and nostalgic appeal of handwriting and physical notebooks.
The author argues that Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg is actively harming the WordPress ecosystem. They criticize the company's focus on closed-source commercial offerings like Jetpack, claiming they duplicate the functionality of existing open-source plugins and force users into expensive subscriptions. This strategy, combined with what the author sees as neglect of core WordPress development and a disregard for community feedback, is portrayed as a deliberate attempt to stifle independent plugin developers and consolidate control within Automattic, ultimately weakening the platform as a whole.
Hacker News commenters largely agree with the article's premise, expressing frustration with Automattic's direction for WordPress. Several criticize the Gutenberg editor for its complexity and perceived bloat, arguing it prioritizes Automattic's business interests over user experience. Some lament the declining quality and rising costs of WordPress.com plans, viewing them as a push towards a closed ecosystem. Others express concern about Automattic's apparent disregard for the open-source community and the potential fracturing of the WordPress ecosystem. A few offer counterpoints, suggesting the criticisms are overblown or that the changes benefit specific user groups. However, the prevailing sentiment reflects a disillusionment with WordPress's current trajectory under Automattic's leadership.
The author recounts a brief, somewhat awkward encounter with Paul Graham at a coffee shop. They nervously approached Graham, introduced themselves as a fan of Hacker News, and mentioned their own startup idea. Graham responded politely but curtly, asking about the idea. After a mumbled explanation, Graham offered a generic piece of advice about focusing on users, then disengaged to rejoin his companions. The author was left feeling slightly deflated, realizing their pitch was underdeveloped and the interaction ultimately uneventful, despite the initial excitement of meeting a revered figure.
HN commenters largely appreciated the author's simple, unpretentious anecdote about meeting Paul Graham. Several noted the positive, down-to-earth impression Graham made, reinforcing his public persona. Some discussed Graham's influence and impact on the startup world, with one commenter sharing a similar experience of a brief but memorable interaction. A few comments questioned the significance of such a short encounter, while others found it relatable and heartwarming. The overall sentiment leaned towards finding the story charming and a pleasant reminder of the human side of even highly successful figures.
Summary of Comments ( 132 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43771645
Hacker News users generally praised the blog post's approach for its simplicity and control. Several commenters shared their own similar setups, often involving variations on static site generators, cloud hosting, and syncing tools. Some appreciated the author's clear explanation and the detailed breakdown of the process. A few discussed the tradeoffs of this method compared to managed platforms like WordPress, highlighting the benefits of ownership and cost savings while acknowledging the increased technical overhead. Specific points of discussion included alternative tools like Jekyll and Zola, different hosting options, and the use of Git for version control and deployment. One commenter suggested using a service like Netlify for simplification, while another pointed out the potential long-term costs associated with Cloudflare if traffic scales significantly.
The Hacker News post discussing the blog post "How I Write My Blogs in Obsidian and Hugo, Publish Instantly" generated a moderate amount of discussion, with several commenters sharing their own experiences and opinions on similar setups.
Several commenters praised the author's choice of tools and workflow. One commenter appreciated the simplicity and efficiency of the setup, particularly the use of Obsidian for writing and Hugo for static site generation. They also highlighted the benefit of owning your content and platform. Another commenter echoed this sentiment, expressing a preference for self-hosted solutions over relying on third-party platforms.
A few commenters shared their own variations of the described setup. One user mentioned using a similar combination of tools but opted for a different hosting provider. They also detailed their process for automatically deploying changes using GitHub Actions. Another commenter described using Obsidian for note-taking and a separate static site generator, Jekyll, for their blog. They emphasized the flexibility and customizability offered by these tools.
Some commenters focused on specific aspects of the author's workflow. One questioned the need for Cloudflare, suggesting alternative solutions for DNS and CDN. Another commenter inquired about the author's experience with Obsidian's mobile app for writing and editing.
A couple of commenters offered alternative approaches to blogging. One suggested using a simpler setup with a single tool like Bear Blog, emphasizing its ease of use for those less technically inclined. Another commenter mentioned using a dedicated blogging platform like Ghost, highlighting its features specifically designed for blogging.
While several commenters expressed their appreciation for the author's setup, some also acknowledged the potential learning curve associated with configuring and maintaining such a system. They suggested that this approach might not be suitable for everyone, particularly those who prioritize simplicity and ease of use.
Overall, the comments section provided a valuable discussion around different blogging workflows, highlighting the pros and cons of various tools and approaches. The general sentiment leaned towards appreciating the control and ownership offered by self-hosted solutions, while also acknowledging the potential complexity involved.