Kevin Rose and Alexis Ohanian, Digg's founder and a former board member respectively, have reacquired the social news platform for an undisclosed sum. Driven by nostalgia and a desire to revitalize a once-prominent internet community, the duo plans to rebuild Digg, focusing on its original mission of surfacing interesting content through community curation. They aim to leverage modern technology and learn from past iterations of the platform, though specific plans remain under wraps. This acquisition marks a return to Digg's roots after multiple ownership changes and declining popularity.
Digg, the once-popular social news aggregator that faded after a controversial redesign, is attempting a comeback under the leadership of its original founder, Kevin Rose, and co-founder Alexis Ohanian. Focusing on a curated experience and aiming to foster constructive discussions, the revived Digg intends to differentiate itself from the current social media landscape plagued by negativity and misinformation. The platform plans to incorporate elements of Web3, including decentralized governance and tokenized rewards, hoping to attract a new generation of users while appealing to nostalgic early adopters. The relaunch faces an uphill battle in a crowded market, but Rose and Ohanian are betting on their vision of a more thoughtful and community-driven online experience.
HN commenters were largely skeptical of Digg's potential return. Many felt the landscape had changed significantly since Digg's heyday, with Reddit effectively filling its niche and X/Twitter dominating real-time news aggregation. Some attributed Digg's original downfall to a combination of bad decisions, like algorithm changes and a focus on promoted content, that alienated the core user base. A few expressed cautious optimism, hoping for a focus on community and better moderation than seen on current platforms, but the overall sentiment was that Digg faced an uphill battle and a repeat of past mistakes was likely. Some questioned the timing and relevance of a Digg resurgence, suggesting that the internet had moved past the need for such a platform.
Paul Graham's 2009 post argues that Twitter's significance stems not from its seeming triviality, but from its unique blend of messaging and public broadcast. It's a new kind of medium, distinct from email or IM, offering a low-friction way to share thoughts and information publicly. This public nature fosters a sense of ambient awareness, keeping users connected to a wider circle than traditional communication methods. Its brevity and immediacy contribute to a feeling of being "present," allowing participation in real-time events and fostering a sense of shared experience. While seemingly inconsequential updates create this presence, they also pave the way for sharing genuinely valuable information within the established network.
HN commenters discuss Paul Graham's 2009 essay on Twitter's significance. Several highlight the prescience of his observations about its future potential, particularly regarding real-time news and conversation. Some contrast Twitter's early simplicity with its current complexity, lamenting feature bloat and the rise of performative posting. Others note how Graham correctly predicted the platform's role as a powerful distribution channel, even envisioning its use for customer support. A few express skepticism about its long-term value, echoing early criticisms about the triviality of its content. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of admiration for Graham's foresight and a wistful look back at a simpler era of social media.
Summary of Comments ( 25 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43266170
Hacker News users reacted to the Digg acquisition with a mix of nostalgia and skepticism. Several commenters recalled Digg's heyday and expressed hope for a revival, albeit with tempered expectations given past iterations. Some discussed the challenges of modern social media and content aggregation, questioning if Digg could find a niche in the current landscape. Others focused on the implications of the acquisition for the existing Digg community and speculated about potential changes to the platform. A sense of cautious optimism prevailed, with many hoping Rose and Ohanian could recapture some of Digg's former glory, but acknowledging the difficulty of such an undertaking.
The Hacker News post discussing Kevin Rose and Alexis Ohanian's acquisition of Digg generated a substantial discussion with a variety of viewpoints.
Several commenters expressed skepticism about the acquisition's potential for success, given Digg's decline in popularity and the challenging landscape of the social media world. They questioned whether Rose and Ohanian could recapture Digg's former glory, particularly in the face of established giants like Reddit (Ohanian's own creation). Some pondered the specific strategies the new owners might employ and if they could effectively differentiate Digg from existing platforms. A recurring theme was the difficulty of rebuilding trust and re-engaging a user base that had largely migrated elsewhere.
Nostalgia was a prominent element in the conversation. Many commenters reminisced about Digg's heyday, recalling its unique features and community dynamics. Some expressed hope that the acquisition could bring back elements of the old Digg they appreciated, while acknowledging the challenges of replicating that experience in the current internet environment.
There was also discussion about the potential reasons behind the acquisition. Some speculated about Rose and Ohanian's motivations, suggesting factors ranging from a desire to revive a beloved platform to financial considerations. The relatively low acquisition price was noted, with some suggesting it might be a worthwhile gamble even if the chances of a full revival were slim.
A few commenters expressed excitement and cautious optimism, hoping that Rose and Ohanian could breathe new life into Digg. They suggested potential directions for the platform, including focusing on niche communities, incorporating new technologies, or emphasizing high-quality content curation.
Overall, the comments reflected a mixture of nostalgia, skepticism, and cautious hope. While many acknowledged the challenges ahead, there was also a sense of curiosity about the direction Rose and Ohanian would take Digg and whether they could achieve even a fraction of its former success.