Stories with Tag Terraform

• IBM completes acquisition of HashiCorp

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-27 22:28:49

  Verbose tl;dr

  IBM has finalized its acquisition of HashiCorp, aiming to create a comprehensive, end-to-end hybrid cloud platform. This combination brings together IBM's existing hybrid cloud portfolio with HashiCorp's infrastructure automation tools, including Terraform, Vault, Consul, and Nomad. The goal is to provide clients with a streamlined experience for building, deploying, and managing applications across any environment, from on-premises data centers to multiple public clouds. This acquisition is intended to solidify IBM's position in the hybrid cloud market and accelerate the adoption of its hybrid cloud platform.

  On February 27, 2025, International Business Machines (IBM) formally announced the successful completion of its acquisition of HashiCorp, a prominent player in the cloud infrastructure automation software sector. This strategic move solidifies IBM's commitment to delivering a comprehensive and robust end-to-end hybrid cloud platform, encompassing a wide spectrum of services from infrastructure provisioning and management to application deployment and security.

  The integration of HashiCorp's widely adopted tools, including Terraform, Vault, Consul, and Packer, into IBM's existing cloud portfolio is expected to empower clients with a streamlined and unified experience for managing their hybrid cloud environments. Specifically, Terraform's infrastructure-as-code capabilities will be leveraged to automate the provisioning and management of resources across both on-premises data centers and various cloud providers, fostering greater agility and efficiency. Vault's robust secrets management functionalities will be instrumental in enhancing security posture by centralizing and safeguarding sensitive data, while Consul's service networking capabilities will contribute to improved application connectivity and resilience across the hybrid cloud landscape. Furthermore, Packer's automated image building capabilities will facilitate the consistent and reliable deployment of applications across diverse environments.

  This acquisition represents a significant step forward in IBM's hybrid cloud strategy, enabling them to offer a more holistic and integrated platform that addresses the evolving needs of businesses navigating the complexities of multi-cloud deployments. By incorporating HashiCorp's advanced automation and security tools, IBM aims to simplify hybrid cloud management, accelerate application modernization initiatives, and bolster overall operational efficiency for its clients. The combined strengths of both companies are poised to create a powerful synergy, offering a more complete and competitive solution within the rapidly evolving hybrid cloud market. This expanded portfolio is designed to empower organizations to seamlessly manage and orchestrate their IT infrastructure across diverse environments, fostering innovation and driving digital transformation.

  • IBM
  • HashiCorp
  • acquisition
  • merger
  • Cloud Computing
  • Hybrid Cloud
  • Enterprise Software
  • Infrastructure as Code
  • Terraform
  • Vault
  • Consul
  • Nomad
  • Platform Engineering
  • Technology News
  • Business News
  • IT Industry

  Summary of Comments ( 306 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43199256

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters are largely skeptical of IBM's ability to successfully integrate HashiCorp, citing IBM's history of failed acquisitions and expressing concern that HashiCorp's open-source ethos will be eroded. Several predict a talent exodus from HashiCorp, and some anticipate a shift towards competing products like Pulumi, Ansible, and Terraform alternatives. Others question the strategic rationale behind the acquisition, suggesting IBM overpaid and may struggle to monetize HashiCorp's offerings. The potential for increased vendor lock-in and higher prices are also raised as concerns. A few commenters express a cautious hope that IBM might surprise them, but overall sentiment is negative.

  The Hacker News post titled "IBM completes acquisition of HashiCorp" generated a significant number of comments discussing the implications of the acquisition. Many commenters express deep skepticism and concern about the future of HashiCorp's products and open-source commitment under IBM's ownership.

  A recurring theme is the perceived cultural mismatch between IBM and HashiCorp, with several commenters citing IBM's history of acquiring and subsequently mismanaging or neglecting acquired companies and technologies. Some express worry that HashiCorp's agile and developer-focused culture will be stifled by IBM's corporate bureaucracy. The fear of rising costs, reduced innovation, and a shift away from open-source principles are frequently mentioned.

  Several commenters draw parallels to IBM's previous acquisitions, such as Red Hat, and speculate whether HashiCorp will suffer a similar fate, with products becoming more enterprise-focused and less accessible to smaller businesses and individual developers. Concerns about potential feature stagnation, slower release cycles, and integration with IBM's existing ecosystem are also raised.

  Some commenters express a sense of betrayal and disappointment, feeling that HashiCorp has abandoned its original mission and community. The possibility of developers migrating to alternative open-source tools is discussed, with some suggesting that this acquisition might create an opportunity for competitors to emerge.

  While the majority of comments express negative sentiment, a few offer more neutral or even cautiously optimistic perspectives. Some suggest that IBM's resources could benefit HashiCorp by accelerating development and expanding its reach. However, even these comments are often tempered with reservations about IBM's track record with acquisitions.

  A few commenters question the long-term strategic rationale behind the acquisition from both IBM and HashiCorp's perspectives. Some speculate about the potential financial pressures that might have led HashiCorp to agree to the acquisition.

  Overall, the comments on Hacker News reflect a predominantly negative reaction to the acquisition, driven by concerns about the cultural clash between the two companies, the potential impact on HashiCorp's products and open-source commitment, and IBM's history with acquired companies.

• Show HN: Terraform Provider for Inexpensive Switches

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-18 13:14:15

  Verbose tl;dr

  A new Terraform provider allows for infrastructure-as-code management of Hrui (formerly TP-Link Omada) SDN-capable network switches, offering a cost-effective alternative to enterprise-grade solutions. This provider enables users to define and automate the configuration of Hrui-based networks, including VLANs, port settings, and other network features, directly within their Terraform deployments. This simplifies network management and improves consistency, particularly for those working with budget-conscious networking setups using these affordable switches.

  The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: Terraform Provider for Inexpensive Switches" introduces a newly developed Terraform provider specifically designed to manage and configure low-cost, typically unmanaged, network switches. The provider, named terraform-provider-hrui, targets the HRUI (HengRui) family of Ethernet switches, which are known for their affordability. This allows for Infrastructure as Code (IaC) management of these devices, a capability not typically available for switches in this price range. The post highlights the ability to now automate the configuration of these switches using Terraform, bringing the benefits of declarative configuration, version control, and reproducibility to network administration, even with budget-friendly hardware. By using the hrui provider within Terraform configurations, users can define and manage aspects of the switch, potentially including VLAN configuration, port settings, and other network-related parameters, directly alongside other infrastructure components within their Terraform deployments. This simplifies network management and enables a more unified and automated approach to infrastructure provisioning and maintenance, even on a tighter budget. The post implicitly suggests a potential expansion of IaC practices to environments previously limited by the management capabilities of affordable networking equipment.

  • Terraform
  • Terraform Provider
  • networking
  • Switches
  • Network Automation
  • Infrastructure as Code
  • IaC
  • HRUI
  • H3C
  • HP
  • cli
  • Command Line Interface

  Summary of Comments ( 4 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42748095

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN users generally expressed interest in the terraform-provider-hrui, praising its potential for managing inexpensive hardware. Several commenters discussed the trade-offs of using cheaper, less feature-rich switches compared to enterprise-grade options, acknowledging the validity of both approaches depending on the use case. Some users questioned the long-term viability and support of the targeted hardware, while others shared their positive experiences with similar budget-friendly networking equipment. The project's open-source nature and potential for community contributions were also highlighted as positive aspects. A few commenters offered specific suggestions for improvement, such as expanding device compatibility and adding support for VLANs.

  The Hacker News post "Show HN: Terraform Provider for Inexpensive Switches" sparked a discussion with several insightful comments focusing on the practicality and limitations of using inexpensive, unmanaged switches in infrastructure setups.

  One commenter questioned the overall benefit, highlighting the potential drawbacks of using unmanaged switches in a professional context. They argued that the cost savings might be negligible when considering the added complexity of managing them indirectly via Terraform and the potential for increased troubleshooting time compared to managed switches. They also mentioned that managed switches often include features like VLANs and PoE, which would be absent in this setup.

  Another commenter expanded on this by emphasizing the operational challenges. They described scenarios where physical access to the switches would be necessary for troubleshooting, negating some of the advantages of infrastructure-as-code. This commenter also underscored the importance of managed switches for security and stability in production environments.

  One user shared a positive experience with using a similar setup with TP-Link Easy Smart switches, noting that the web interface allowed for static MAC assignment and port descriptions, bridging some of the functionality gap between unmanaged and fully managed switches. They also acknowledged the limitations, especially the lack of loop detection, and recommended this approach only for simple home networks.

  A different commenter pointed out the niche use case for this Terraform provider, suggesting it could be valuable for labs, testing environments, or temporary setups. They acknowledged the limitations for production environments but saw the potential for automating the configuration of basic network topologies in non-critical scenarios.

  Another comment chain discussed the challenges of power management in such setups, with users sharing their experiences and suggesting solutions for remotely rebooting switches, including smart plugs and other out-of-band management tools. This highlights a practical consideration for those looking to implement a similar solution.

  Finally, one comment focused on the choice of Lua for the provider's implementation, expressing surprise and wondering about the reasoning behind it. This comment, while not directly related to the use case of inexpensive switches, touches upon the technical aspects of the provider itself.

  In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post present a balanced perspective, acknowledging the potential use cases of the Terraform provider for inexpensive switches while also highlighting the limitations and operational challenges, particularly in professional or production environments. The discussion revolves around the trade-offs between cost savings and manageability, with commenters sharing their practical experiences and suggesting workarounds for some of the limitations.