Oda Ujiharu, a Sengoku-era warlord often dubbed the "weakest," is surprisingly remembered fondly in Japan, not for military prowess, but for his peaceful and clever governance. Faced with the overwhelming power of Oda Nobunaga, Ujiharu recognized his inevitable defeat and prioritized the well-being of his people. Instead of futile resistance, he negotiated surrender terms that preserved their lives and livelihoods, even securing a comfortable retirement for himself. This act of selflessness and pragmatic leadership, prioritizing his people over personal glory, cemented his legacy as a benevolent and wise ruler, a stark contrast to the era's often brutal warlords.
"The Blood on the Keyboard" details the often-overlooked human cost of war reporting. Focusing on World War II correspondents, the article highlights the immense psychological toll exacted by witnessing and documenting constant violence, death, and suffering. These journalists, driven by a sense of duty and the need to inform the public, suppressed their trauma and emotions in order to file their stories, often working under perilous conditions with little support. This resulted in lasting psychological scars, including depression, anxiety, and what we now recognize as PTSD, impacting their lives long after the war ended. The article underscores that the news we consume comes at a price, paid not just in ink and paper, but also in the mental and emotional well-being of those who bring us these stories.
HN users discuss the complexities of judging historical figures by modern standards, particularly regarding Woodrow Wilson's racism. Some argue that while Wilson's views were reprehensible, they were common for his time, and judging him solely on that ignores his other contributions. Others counter that his racism had tangible, devastating consequences for Black Americans and shouldn't be excused. Several commenters highlight the selective application of this "presentism" argument, noting it's rarely used to defend figures reviled by the right. The discussion also touches on the role of historical narratives in shaping present-day understanding, and the importance of acknowledging the full scope of historical figures' actions, both good and bad. A few comments delve into specific examples of Wilson's racist policies and their impact.
The article "Seeing Through the Spartan Mirage" argues that the popular image of Spartans as disciplined, egalitarian super-soldiers is largely a manufactured myth propagated centuries after their decline. While Spartans certainly emphasized military prowess and had a unique social structure, the reality was far more complex and less romanticized. Their system relied heavily on the brutal subjugation of the helot population, leading to constant fear of revolt and limiting their ability to project power. Furthermore, Spartan society was riddled with inequality, marked by wealth disparities and a powerful elite that manipulated the narrative to their advantage. The article concludes that the romanticized Spartan ideal, perpetuated through selective historical accounts and philosophical idealization, obscures a much darker and less exceptional reality.
HN users generally agree with the article's debunking of the "Spartan mirage," pointing out that Sparta's system was brutal, unsustainable, and ultimately a failure. Several commenters highlight the hypocrisy of romanticizing a society built on slavery and constant warfare. Some discuss the dangers of idealizing historical societies without acknowledging their flaws, and how this can be used to justify harmful modern ideologies. Others question the reliability of sources on Spartan history, emphasizing the need for critical analysis. A few offer alternative interpretations, suggesting that Sparta's militarism might have been a response to specific geopolitical pressures, not a deliberate choice. The lack of archaeological evidence compared to Athens is also mentioned, further reinforcing the idea of a constructed narrative around Spartan society.
This 2019 War on the Rocks article argues that while obedience is generally essential in the military, blind obedience can be detrimental. It emphasizes the importance of fostering a culture where subordinates possess the judgment and moral courage to disobey unlawful, unethical, or strategically unsound orders. The piece uses historical examples, such as the My Lai Massacre, to illustrate the dangers of unquestioning obedience and highlights the responsibility of leaders to create an environment that encourages dissent when necessary. Ultimately, it advocates for a balance between obedience and independent, critical thinking within the military chain of command to ensure ethical conduct and mission success.
HN users discuss the complexities of disobedience in the military, emphasizing the difficulty of discerning lawful from unlawful orders in real-time, high-stress situations. Some highlight the importance of clear, pre-established guidelines and training to equip soldiers for these scenarios. Others point out the potential consequences of disobedience, even when justified, and the burden of proof placed on the individual. The inherent power imbalance in the military structure and the potential for abuse are also touched upon, with one commenter suggesting the necessity of strong legal protections for whistleblowers and those who refuse unlawful orders. Several commenters offer personal anecdotes or historical examples to illustrate the nuances and challenges involved in military disobedience. Finally, some question the practicality of the proposed framework in the linked article, arguing that it doesn't adequately address the pressure and fear often present in combat situations.
In 1943, Squadron Leader Douglas Bader, a double-amputee pilot, was shot down over German-occupied France during Operation Leg. The operation's unique aspect stemmed not from its military objectives, but from Bader's prosthetic legs. The Luftwaffe, respecting Bader's courage and skill, agreed to a British request to drop a replacement leg. This act of chivalry amid war became a testament to Bader's indomitable spirit and the odd moments of humanity that can emerge even in conflict. The replacement leg was ultimately delivered, though not without some near misses and a second, ultimately unnecessary drop.
Hacker News users discussed Douglas Bader's remarkable resilience and skill as a pilot despite his double amputation. Several commenters expressed admiration for his determination to fly again after losing both legs, highlighting the psychological and physical challenges he overcame. Some noted the crucial role of his wife, Thelma, in his recovery and return to flying. The discussion also touched on the advancements in prosthetic technology at the time and Bader's eventual contributions to disability advocacy. A few users shared additional resources, including Bader's autobiography, "Reach for the Sky," and a documentary about his life. One commenter poignantly reflected on the societal shift from viewing disability as a limitation to recognizing the potential for individuals with disabilities to achieve remarkable feats.
In the chaotic final days of the Vietnam War, South Vietnamese Air Force Major Buang-Ly loaded his wife, five children, and his mother onto a two-seat Cessna O-1 Bird Dog. Knowing Saigon was about to fall to the North Vietnamese, he desperately searched for the USS Midway. Locating the carrier, he dropped a note pleading for a clear deck and then skillfully landed the overloaded plane, a feat practically unheard of for such a small aircraft on a moving carrier. His daring act saved his family, and though the plane was pushed overboard to make room for other escaping helicopters, Ly's bravery became a symbol of resilience and desperation amidst the war's end.
HN commenters largely focused on the incredible feat of landing a Cessna O-1 on the USS Midway's deck, highlighting the pilot's skill and bravery given the plane's lack of tailhook and the small landing area. Some questioned the historical accuracy of the number of people onboard, citing conflicting accounts. Others discussed the chaos of the fall of Saigon and the desperation of refugees fleeing the communist regime, with some expressing sympathy for the pilot's plight while others debated the US's role in the Vietnam War and its aftermath. A few commenters shared personal anecdotes related to the evacuation or their own experiences with the O-1 aircraft, adding a personal dimension to the historical discussion. The logistics of getting the family off the carrier and the fate of the plane were also points of interest.
The Finnish Wartime Photograph Archive (SA-Kuva) offers free access to over 160,000 digitized photographs documenting Finland's wars between 1939 and 1945, including the Winter War, Continuation War, and Lapland War. The archive features images from both the military and home front, providing a comprehensive visual record of the conflicts' impact on Finnish society. Searchable in Finnish, Swedish, and English, the archive facilitates research and allows users to explore photographs by keyword, photographer, location, and date.
Hacker News users generally expressed appreciation for the Finnish Wartime Photograph Archive, praising its size, searchability, and the quality of the digitized images. Several commenters pointed out the poignant contrast between mundane photos of daily life and those depicting the harsh realities of war. Some noted the powerful human element present in the collection, observing that the faces of the soldiers and civilians captured reflect universal experiences of conflict and resilience. A few users with Finnish ancestry shared personal connections to the archive, explaining how it helped them connect with their family history and understand the experiences of their relatives during wartime. The ease of navigation and browsing through the vast collection was also highlighted as a positive aspect.
The Byzantine-Sassanian War of 602-628 CE, often considered the final major conflict of antiquity, was a devastating struggle between the Byzantine Empire and the Sassanian Persian Empire. Triggered by a Persian revolt against the pro-Byzantine Persian emperor Maurice, the war escalated into a brutal back-and-forth campaign spanning decades and vast territories. The Persians achieved remarkable early successes, conquering large swaths of the Byzantine Levant, Egypt, and Anatolia. However, Emperor Heraclius rallied the Byzantines, launching a daring counteroffensive deep into Persian territory. This, coupled with internal strife within the Sassanian Empire, ultimately led to a Byzantine victory. The war drastically weakened both empires, leaving them vulnerable to the emerging Islamic caliphate, which would soon conquer much of the region. The conflict fundamentally reshaped the political and religious landscape of the Near East, marking a pivotal transition from the classical to the medieval world.
HN commenters discuss the brutal and exhausting nature of the Byzantine-Sassanian War, highlighting its devastating impact on both empires and paving the way for the Islamic conquests. Several commenters point out the cyclical nature of empires, with one suggesting the war was a Pyrrhic victory for Byzantium, leaving them vulnerable. The religious aspects of the conflict are also touched upon, with one commenter mentioning the persecution of Zoroastrians in the Roman Empire. Another commenter emphasizes the importance of primary sources like the Strategikon of Maurice for understanding Byzantine military thought. Finally, the relative lack of popular awareness of this historically significant war is noted, despite its profound consequences.
From 1967 to 1988, under Enver Hoxha's paranoid communist regime, Albania constructed hundreds of thousands of concrete bunkers across its territory. Fearing invasion from both NATO and the Warsaw Pact, Hoxha envisioned these small, ubiquitous structures as defensive positions for a "people's war." While intended to protect against external threats, the bunkers ultimately proved largely useless for their intended purpose and now stand as a peculiar and enduring reminder of Albania's isolated past. They litter the landscape, repurposed for various uses or simply left abandoned, symbolizing the paranoia and misallocation of resources that characterized Hoxha's rule.
HN commenters discussed the sheer number of bunkers built in Albania (up to 750,000) during Enver Hoxha's rule, driven by his paranoia of invasion. Some questioned the actual number, citing difficulties in accurate counts, while others highlighted the bunkers' current repurposing as homes, cafes, or even mushroom farms. The impracticality of defending against a modern military with such bunkers was also noted, along with the significant economic cost diverted to their construction. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of encountering the bunkers while traveling in Albania, describing them as a constant and somewhat eerie reminder of the country's past. The discussion also touched upon Hoxha's isolationist policies and the lasting impact of his regime.
Summary of Comments ( 24 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714619
HN commenters generally found the story of Oda Ujiharu heartwarming and appreciated learning about a historical figure who prioritized his people's well-being over personal glory. Several highlighted the contrast between Ujiharu's compassionate leadership and the typical ruthlessness often associated with warlords. Some debated the accuracy of the "weakest" label, arguing that his pragmatic choices demonstrated strength and wisdom. A few commenters also pointed out the story's relevance to modern leadership and its potential lessons for business and management. One compelling comment suggested that Ujiharu's enduring popularity stems from a cultural appreciation for humility and the quiet strength of choosing peace, especially in a society that historically valued martial prowess. Another insightful comment connected Ujiharu's actions to the concept of "noblesse oblige," arguing that his sense of responsibility towards his people drove his decisions.
The Hacker News post discussing the "weakest samurai warlord" Oda Ujiharu generated several interesting comments, primarily focusing on the nuances of translating "weakest" and the complexities of judging historical figures by modern standards.
Several commenters pointed out that "weakest" might be a misleading translation. They suggest that the term used in the original Japanese source likely refers more to his lack of military prowess or perhaps his physical frailty, rather than a complete lack of strength in all areas. One commenter specifically mentions that "weakest" could be interpreted as "least warlike", highlighting Ujiharu's preference for cultural pursuits and economic development over military conquest. This distinction is crucial, they argue, as it shifts the narrative from one of incompetence to one of a conscious choice to prioritize different values.
Another commenter emphasizes the importance of cultural context. They explain that in a society steeped in Bushido, the samurai code of honor, Ujiharu's focus on peace and prosperity could be seen as a sign of true strength and wisdom, even if it deviated from the traditional warrior archetype. This perspective challenges the modern tendency to equate strength with military might, offering a more nuanced understanding of leadership.
Building on this idea, another comment highlights the long-term benefits of Ujiharu's rule. By fostering economic growth and cultural development, he laid the foundation for future prosperity in his domain. This long-term vision, they argue, demonstrates a different kind of strength, one that focuses on building a lasting legacy rather than achieving short-term military victories.
One commenter draws parallels to other historical figures who were considered "weak" by their contemporaries but later reevaluated in a more positive light. This suggests that our understanding of historical figures is often shaped by the biases of their time and that a more nuanced perspective can emerge with historical distance.
Finally, a few commenters express some skepticism about the article's premise, questioning whether Ujiharu was truly the "weakest" or if this is simply a catchy narrative designed to attract readers. They call for more historical evidence to support this claim, highlighting the importance of critical thinking when encountering historical narratives.
In summary, the comments on Hacker News provide a more nuanced and critical perspective on the article's portrayal of Oda Ujiharu. They challenge the simplified notion of "weakest," emphasizing the importance of cultural context, long-term vision, and the complexities of judging historical figures by modern standards. They also demonstrate the value of online discussions in fostering a deeper understanding of historical narratives.