The best programmers aren't defined by raw coding speed or esoteric language knowledge. Instead, they possess a combination of strong fundamentals, a pragmatic approach to problem-solving, and excellent communication skills. They prioritize building robust, maintainable systems over clever hacks, focusing on clarity and simplicity in their code. This allows them to effectively collaborate with others, understand the broader business context of their work, and adapt to evolving requirements. Ultimately, their effectiveness comes from a holistic understanding of software development, not just technical prowess.
The UK possesses significant untapped hardware engineering talent, hindered by a risk-averse investment landscape that prioritizes software over hardware startups. This preference stems from the perceived higher costs and longer development timelines associated with hardware, leading to a scarcity of funding and support. Consequently, promising hardware engineers often migrate to software roles or leave the country altogether, depriving the UK of potential innovation and economic growth in crucial sectors like semiconductors, robotics, and clean energy. The author argues for increased investment and a shift in perspective to recognize the long-term value and strategic importance of fostering a thriving hardware ecosystem.
Hacker News users discuss the challenges and potential of the UK hardware industry. Several commenters point out the difficulty of competing with US salaries and stock options, making it hard to retain talent in the UK. Others argue that the UK's strength lies in specific niche areas like silicon design, photonics, and high-end audio, rather than mass-market consumer electronics. Some suggest that the UK's smaller market size discourages large-scale hardware ventures, while others highlight the role of universities and research institutions in fostering talent. There's also discussion about the impact of Brexit, with some claiming it has worsened the talent drain, while others downplay its effect. Finally, some commenters suggest potential solutions, like government incentives, increased investment, and fostering a stronger entrepreneurial culture to retain and attract hardware talent within the UK.
Summary of Comments ( 191 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43629307
HN users generally agreed with the author's premise that the best programmers are adaptable, pragmatic, and prioritize shipping working software. Several commenters emphasized the importance of communication and collaboration skills, noting that even highly technically proficient programmers can be ineffective if they can't work well with others. Some questioned the author's emphasis on speed, arguing that rushing can lead to technical debt and bugs. One highly upvoted comment suggested that "best" is subjective and depends on the specific context, pointing out that a programmer excelling in a fast-paced startup environment might struggle in a large, established company. Others shared anecdotal experiences supporting the author's points, citing examples of highly effective programmers who embodied the qualities described.
The Hacker News post "The best programmers I know" generated a fair number of comments discussing the linked blog post's criteria for defining a "best" programmer. Several commenters resonated with the author's emphasis on pragmatism, communication, and focus on shipping functional products over perfect code. One commenter highlighted the importance of "finishing things," arguing that many talented programmers get bogged down in perfecting details and fail to deliver a finished product. This sentiment was echoed by others who pointed out that the ability to ship working software, even if not initially perfect, is a crucial skill.
Several commenters expanded on the importance of communication, both written and verbal. One commenter specifically highlighted the ability to explain complex technical concepts in a clear and concise way to non-technical stakeholders as a defining characteristic of a great programmer. Another agreed, emphasizing the importance of understanding the business context and communicating effectively within a team.
Some commenters offered alternative perspectives on what constitutes a "best" programmer. One suggested that curiosity and a desire to learn new things are essential traits. Another highlighted the importance of adaptability and the ability to pick up new technologies quickly. The ability to debug effectively and systematically troubleshoot issues was also mentioned as a critical skill.
A few commenters pushed back on the author's assertion that the "best" programmers avoid complexity. They argued that sometimes complexity is unavoidable and that true mastery lies in managing that complexity effectively. One commenter suggested that the ability to break down complex problems into smaller, more manageable pieces is a hallmark of a skilled programmer.
The thread also touched on the importance of experience, with some commenters arguing that true mastery comes only with years of practice. Others emphasized the importance of continuous learning and staying up-to-date with the latest technologies.
Overall, the comments reflect a broad consensus on the qualities that make a programmer effective. While technical skill is undoubtedly important, the comments emphasize the equally important role of soft skills like communication, collaboration, and pragmatism. The ability to ship working software and continuously learn and adapt were also highlighted as crucial attributes.