A distributed computing project leveraging idle CPU time from volunteers' computers has set a new verification record for the Goldbach Conjecture. The project, utilizing a novel grid computing approach, has confirmed the conjecture – which states that every even number greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes – up to 4 * 10^18 + 7 * 10^13. This surpasses previous verification efforts by a significant margin and demonstrates the potential of harnessing distributed computing power for tackling complex mathematical problems.
Fibonacci hashing offers a faster alternative to the typical modulo operator (%) for distributing items into hash tables, especially when the table size is a power of two. It leverages the golden ratio's properties by multiplying the hash key by a large constant derived from the golden ratio and then bit-shifting the result, effectively achieving a modulo operation without the expensive division. This method produces a more even distribution compared to modulo with prime table sizes, particularly when dealing with keys exhibiting sequential patterns, thus reducing collisions and improving performance. While theoretically superior, its benefits may be negligible in modern systems due to compiler optimizations and branch prediction for modulo with powers of two.
HN commenters generally praise the article for clearly explaining Fibonacci hashing and its benefits over modulo. Some point out that the technique is not forgotten, being used in game development and hash table implementations within popular languages like Java. A few commenters discuss the nuances of the golden ratio's properties and its suitability for hashing, with one noting the importance of good hash functions over minor speed differences in the hashing algorithm itself. Others shared alternative hashing methods like "Multiply-with-carry" and "SplitMix64", along with links to resources on hash table performance testing. A recurring theme is that Fibonacci hashing shines with power-of-two table sizes, losing its advantages (and potentially becoming worse) with prime table sizes.
The blog post explores the origin of seemingly arbitrary divisibility problems often encountered in undergraduate mathematics courses. It argues that these problems aren't typically plucked from thin air, but rather stem from broader mathematical concepts, particularly abstract algebra. The post uses the example of proving divisibility by 7 using a specific algorithm to illustrate how such problems can be derived from exploring properties of polynomial rings and quotient rings. Essentially, the apparently random divisibility rule is a consequence of working within a modular arithmetic system, which connects to deeper algebraic structures. The post aims to demystify these types of problems and show how they offer a glimpse into richer mathematical ideas.
The Hacker News comments discuss the origin and nature of "divisibility trick" problems often encountered in introductory number theory or math competitions. Several commenters point out that these problems often stem from exploring properties within modular arithmetic, even if not explicitly framed that way. Some suggest the problems are valuable for developing intuition about number systems and problem-solving skills. However, others argue that they can feel contrived or "magical," lacking connection to broader mathematical concepts. The idea of "casting out nines" is mentioned as a specific example, with some commenters highlighting its historical significance for checking calculations, while others dismiss it as a niche trick. A few commenters express a general appreciation for the linked blog post, praising its clarity and exploration of the topic.
Certain prime numbers possess aesthetically pleasing or curious properties that make them stand out and become targets for "prime hunters." These include palindromic primes (reading the same forwards and backwards), repunit primes (consisting only of the digit 1), and Mersenne primes (one less than a power of two). The rarity and mathematical beauty of these special primes drive both amateur and professional mathematicians to seek them out using sophisticated algorithms and distributed computing projects, pushing the boundaries of computational power and our understanding of prime number distribution.
HN commenters largely discussed the memorability and aesthetics of the listed prime numbers, debating whether the criteria truly made them special or just reflected pattern-seeking tendencies. Some questioned the article's focus on base 10 representation, arguing that memorability is subjective and base-dependent. Others appreciated the exploration of mathematical beauty and shared their own favorite "interesting" numbers. Several commenters noted the connection to Smarandache sequences and other recreational math concepts, with links provided for further exploration. The practicality of searching for such primes was also questioned, with some suggesting it was merely a curiosity with no real-world application.
Summary of Comments ( 85 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43734583
Hacker News users discuss the computational resources used for the Goldbach conjecture verification, questioning the value and novelty of the achievement. Some commenters express skepticism about the significance of extending the verification limit, arguing that it doesn't contribute significantly to proving the conjecture itself. Others point out the inefficiency of the distributed grid computing approach compared to more optimized single-machine implementations. A few users discuss the specific hardware and software used in the project, including the use of BOINC and GPUs, while others debate the proper way to credit contributors in such distributed projects. Several commenters express concern about the lack of available source code and details on the verification methodology, hindering independent verification and analysis.
The Hacker News post discussing the new world record for verifying Goldbach's Conjecture has a modest number of comments, mostly focusing on the technical aspects of the distributed computing approach used and the nature of the conjecture itself.
Several commenters delve into the specifics of the grid computing system employed. One user questions the efficiency gains of this distributed approach compared to utilizing a single, powerful machine, highlighting potential overheads associated with network communication and data transfer. Another commenter speculates on the possibility of optimizing the verification process further by leveraging SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions, potentially leading to even faster computation times. There's also a brief discussion regarding the memory requirements of such an endeavor, with one commenter suggesting that RAM limitations wouldn't be a major hurdle.
Another thread of discussion revolves around the mathematical implications of the Goldbach Conjecture and the nature of "proof" versus "verification." One commenter points out that while the project provides further strong evidence supporting the conjecture, it doesn't constitute a mathematical proof. They elaborate on the difference between verifying the conjecture up to a certain limit and proving it for all even numbers greater than 2. Another user concurs, adding that despite the impressive scale of the verification, it remains "an interesting data point, not a mathematical breakthrough."
A few comments address the practicalities of the project. One user asks about the availability of the source code, indicating an interest in examining the implementation details. Another commenter questions the overall value of the project, expressing skepticism about the scientific merit of merely pushing the verification limit higher.
Finally, there are some brief exchanges regarding the history of the Goldbach Conjecture and previous attempts to verify it. One commenter mentions a prior effort using BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing) and inquires about the differences between that project and the one discussed in the article.
In summary, the comments section provides a mix of technical insights into the distributed computing aspect of the project, discussions about the mathematical nature of the Goldbach Conjecture, and some pragmatic questions regarding the project's implementation and significance. While there isn't a single overwhelmingly compelling comment, the collective discussion offers a nuanced perspective on the achievement and its limitations.