To write blog posts that developers will actually read, focus on providing clear, concise, and practical information. Prioritize code examples, concrete solutions, and a logical flow that mirrors the developer's problem-solving process. Avoid unnecessary jargon, flowery language, and long introductions. Instead, get straight to the point, explain the "why" behind the "how," and use visuals like diagrams and screenshots to illustrate complex concepts. Finally, ensure your code is functional, well-formatted, and easily testable by readers. This approach respects the developer's time and provides immediate value, making your blog post a useful resource they'll appreciate and share.
Kevin Quirk argues against using Twitter threads for substantive content, advocating for blog posts instead. He points out Twitter's ephemeral nature, poor searchability, lack of control over formatting and content presentation, and the difficulty of revising or updating information. A blog, in contrast, offers permanence, improved discoverability through search engines, greater control over formatting and multimedia inclusion, and the ability to easily edit and update. This creates a superior reading experience and allows creators to build a lasting, searchable body of work that they own and control, unlike content trapped within the walled garden of a social media platform.
Hacker News users generally agree with the author's premise that blog posts are superior to Twitter threads for conveying complex ideas. Several commenters point out the ephemeral nature of Twitter content and the difficulty of searching or referencing it later. The improved formatting, editing capabilities, and permanence of blogs are highlighted as key advantages. Some users mention the benefit of owning your content on a personal platform rather than relying on a third-party service. A few dissenting opinions suggest Twitter threads can be effective for quick thoughts and reaching a wider audience, but acknowledge blogs are better for in-depth analysis. The lack of comments/likes on personal blogs is mentioned as a potential drawback, though others counter that this allows for more focused writing without the pressure of social media engagement.
Even with the rise of AI content generation, blogging retains its value. AI excels at producing generic, surface-level content, but struggles with nuanced, original thought, personal experience, and building genuine connection with an audience. Human bloggers can leverage AI tools to enhance productivity, but the core value remains in authentic voice, unique perspectives, and building trust through consistent engagement, which are crucial for long-term success. This allows bloggers to cultivate a loyal following and establish themselves as authorities within their niche, something AI cannot replicate.
Hacker News users discuss the value of blogging in the age of AI, largely agreeing with the original author. Several commenters highlight the importance of personal experience and perspective, which AI can't replicate. One compelling comment argues that blogs act as filters, curating information overload and offering trusted viewpoints. Another emphasizes the community aspect, suggesting that blogs foster connections and discussions around shared interests. Some acknowledge AI's potential for content creation, but believe human-written blogs will maintain their value due to the element of authentic human voice and connection. The overall sentiment is that while AI may change the blogging landscape, it won't replace the core value of human-generated content.
Learning in public, as discussed in Giles Thomas's post, offers numerous benefits revolving around accelerated learning and career advancement. By sharing your learning journey, you solidify your understanding through articulation and receive valuable feedback from others. This process also builds a portfolio showcasing your skills and progress, attracting potential collaborators and employers. The act of teaching, inherent in public learning, further cements knowledge and establishes you as a credible resource within your field. Finally, the connections forged through shared learning experiences expand your network and open doors to new opportunities.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's premise about the benefits of learning in public. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of how publicly documenting their learning journeys, even if imperfectly, led to unexpected connections, valuable feedback, and career opportunities. Some highlighted the importance of focusing on the process over the outcome, emphasizing that consistent effort and genuine curiosity are more impactful than polished perfection. A few cautioned against overthinking or being overly concerned with external validation, suggesting that the primary focus should remain on personal growth. One user pointed out the potential negative aspect of focusing solely on maximizing output for external gains and advocated for intrinsic motivation as a more sustainable driver. The discussion also briefly touched upon the discoverability of older "deep dive" posts, suggesting their enduring value even years later.
The core message of "Just Write" is to overcome the paralysis of perfectionism and the fear of judgment by simply starting to write. Don't get bogged down in elaborate outlines or editing; instead, prioritize consistent writing practice to develop your skills and discover your voice. The more you write, the easier it becomes, and the better your writing will be. Embrace imperfection, focus on quantity over quality initially, and view writing as a process of iterative refinement. Over time, this consistent effort will lead to significant improvement and unlock your creative potential.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the core message of "Just Write," emphasizing the importance of consistent writing for skill development and idea generation. Several commenters shared their personal experiences with writing streaks and the positive impact it had on their clarity of thought and ability to articulate ideas. Some cautioned against focusing solely on quantity over quality, suggesting a balance is needed. The idea of lowering the bar for publishing, embracing imperfection, and iterating based on feedback was also discussed. One commenter pointed out the parallels between writing and coding, highlighting the iterative nature of both. Another popular sentiment was the importance of finding a niche and writing about topics that genuinely interest the author.
Even if no one reads your blog, it's still valuable. Writing clarifies your thinking, solidifies your understanding of a topic, and acts as a personal record of your intellectual journey. It can serve as a sandbox for experimenting with ideas, a portfolio to showcase skills, and a springboard for future projects. Essentially, blogging is an act of learning and self-improvement, with the potential bonus of connecting with an audience down the line.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that blogging, even without a large audience, has value. Several highlight the benefits of writing as a way to clarify thinking, consolidate knowledge, and improve writing skills. Some suggest that a blog can serve as a personal knowledge base, searchable archive, or a way to track personal growth. A few practical suggestions include focusing on niche topics and promoting the blog through relevant communities. The idea of writing primarily for oneself, with the potential for an audience as a secondary benefit, is a recurring theme. Some commenters share their own experiences of low-traffic blogs providing unexpected value, like attracting job offers or connecting with like-minded individuals. The overall sentiment is that the intrinsic rewards of blogging often outweigh the pressure of building a large readership.
Benjamin Congdon's blog post discusses the increasing prevalence of low-quality, AI-generated content ("AI slop") online and the resulting erosion of trust in written material. He argues that this flood of generated text makes it harder to find genuinely human-created content and fosters a climate of suspicion, where even authentic writing is questioned. Congdon proposes "writing back" as a solution – a conscious effort to create and share thoughtful, personal, and demonstrably human writing that resists the homogenizing tide of AI-generated text. He suggests focusing on embodied experience, nuanced perspectives, and complex emotional responses, emphasizing qualities that are difficult for current AI models to replicate, ultimately reclaiming the value and authenticity of human expression in the digital space.
Hacker News users discuss the increasing prevalence of AI-generated content and the resulting erosion of trust online. Several commenters echo the author's sentiment about the blandness and lack of originality in AI-produced text, describing it as "soulless" and lacking a genuine perspective. Some express concern over the potential for AI to further homogenize online content, creating a feedback loop where AI trains on AI-generated text, leading to a decline in quality and diversity. Others debate the practicality of detecting AI-generated content and the potential for false positives. The idea of "writing back," or actively creating original, human-generated content, is presented as a form of resistance against this trend. A few commenters also touch upon the ethical implications of using AI for content creation, particularly regarding plagiarism and the potential displacement of human writers.
The New York Times article explores the hypothetical scenario of TikTok disappearing and the possibility that its absence might not be deeply felt. It suggests that while TikTok filled a specific niche in short-form, algorithm-driven entertainment, its core function—connecting creators and consumers—is easily replicable. The piece argues that competing platforms like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts are already adept at providing similar content and could readily absorb TikTok's user base and creators. Ultimately, the article posits that the internet's dynamic nature makes any platform, even a seemingly dominant one, potentially expendable and easily replaced.
HN commenters largely agree with the NYT article's premise that TikTok's potential ban wouldn't be as impactful as some believe. Several point out that previous "essential" platforms like MySpace and Vine faded without significant societal disruption, suggesting TikTok could follow the same path. Some discuss potential replacements already filling niche interests, like short-form video apps focused on specific hobbies or communities. Others highlight the addictive nature of TikTok's algorithm and express hope that a ban or decline would free up time and mental energy. A few dissenting opinions suggest TikTok's unique cultural influence, particularly on music and trends, will be missed, while others note the platform's utility for small businesses.
Summary of Comments ( 49 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43503872
HN commenters generally praised the article for its practical advice on writing for a technical audience. Several highlighted the importance of clarity, conciseness, and providing concrete examples, echoing the article's points. Some suggested additional tips, like linking to relevant resources and using clear diagrams. One commenter appreciated the focus on empathy for the reader and understanding their context. A few debated the value of analogies, with some finding them helpful while others considered them distracting or potentially misleading. The emphasis on respecting the reader's time and intelligence was a recurring theme throughout the comments.
The Hacker News post "How to Write Blog Posts That Developers Read · Refactoring English" generated a moderate amount of discussion with several insightful comments.
Many commenters praised the article for its practical advice and clear writing style. One commenter appreciated the focus on clarity and conciseness, stating that it mirrored their own experiences trying to find helpful technical information online. They lamented the prevalence of overly verbose or poorly written blog posts that waste a developer's time. Another user echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of getting straight to the point and avoiding unnecessary fluff, particularly when developers are looking for solutions to specific problems.
The suggestion to avoid jargon and explain technical terms was well-received, with several comments highlighting the difficulty of navigating technical content when unfamiliar with specific terminology. One commenter, identifying as a junior developer, explained how daunting it can be to encounter unfamiliar acronyms or technical terms, making clear explanations crucial for accessibility. Another pointed out that even experienced developers may not be familiar with all the jargon in a specific niche, reinforcing the universal benefit of clear definitions.
The advice regarding code examples also sparked discussion. Several commenters underscored the importance of clear, concise, and functional code examples. One commenter argued that code examples should be treated with the same care as the prose, ensuring they are well-formatted, commented, and directly relevant to the topic. They suggested avoiding overly complex or contrived examples that obscure the core concept being explained. Another emphasized the value of showing both incorrect and corrected code to illustrate the problem and solution effectively.
Some comments also offered additional tips not explicitly mentioned in the article. One user suggested using visual aids like diagrams or flowcharts to supplement code examples and explanations, particularly for complex topics. Another recommended using a consistent format and structure for code blocks to improve readability.
A few commenters expressed minor criticisms. One commenter felt that the article's focus on brevity could be misinterpreted as discouraging thorough explanations. They argued that while conciseness is important, it shouldn't come at the expense of providing sufficient detail for readers to fully understand the topic.
Overall, the comments on the Hacker News post largely praised the article for its practical advice on writing effective technical blog posts for developers. The discussion emphasized the importance of clarity, conciseness, clear code examples, and avoiding jargon to create engaging and informative content.