In 1972, a dead, 45-foot sperm whale washed ashore near Florence, Oregon. Due to its size and the remote location, officials decided the most expedient way to dispose of the carcass was to use dynamite. The resulting explosion scattered blubber and whale parts over a wide area, damaging nearby cars and creating a spectacle that became infamous. Rather than solving the problem, the explosion made the remains even more difficult to clean up, leaving a lingering stench and attracting scavengers. The event went viral before the internet age, becoming a cautionary tale of poorly planned solutions.
Divers trapped aboard a burning Red Sea liveaboard dive boat for 35 hours recounted harrowing escapes. Some jumped from the upper decks into the darkness, while others waited for rescue boats, navigating through smoke and flames. The fire, believed to have started in the engine room, rapidly engulfed the Hurricane dive boat, forcing passengers and crew to abandon ship with little warning. While all 55 passengers and crew survived, some suffered burns and other injuries. Egyptian authorities are investigating the cause of the fire.
HN commenters discuss the harrowing experience of the divers, with several focusing on the psychological impact of being trapped in the dark for so long. Some question the decision-making of the dive operator, particularly the lack of readily available emergency communication and the delay in rescue efforts. Others praise the divers' resilience and resourcefulness in escaping the sinking boat, highlighting the importance of dive training and maintaining composure in emergencies. A few commenters share personal anecdotes of similar close calls while diving, emphasizing the inherent risks involved in the activity. The discussion also touches on the potential legal ramifications for the dive operator and the need for stricter safety regulations in the diving industry.
Summary of Comments ( 3 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43399155
Hacker News users discussed the logistics and ethics of exhibiting a whale carcass, referencing the "Art the Whale" incident. Some commenters recalled seeing Art on tour and shared personal anecdotes. Others debated the educational value versus the potential disrespect of such displays, questioning whether a replica would have been a better option. Several users highlighted the smell, describing it as pervasive and unforgettable. There was also discussion of the difficulties in preserving such a large specimen and the eventual decay that necessitated its burial. A few commenters mentioned other instances of preserved animals, including a giant squid and Lenin's body, drawing comparisons to Art's preservation and display.
The Hacker News post titled "Art the Whale" links to an article detailing the story of a sperm whale that beached in 1970 and was subsequently filled with explosives and detonated by the Oregon Highway Division. The comments section on Hacker News contains a robust discussion with various perspectives on the incident.
Several commenters express disbelief and amusement at the absurdity of the situation, highlighting the sheer scale of the explosion and the unexpected consequences, such as the raining blubber described in the linked article. The ineffectiveness of the chosen method for disposal and the lack of foresight are recurring themes. Some users share anecdotes of seeing the footage on television or hearing stories about it, solidifying the event's place in somewhat morbid popular culture.
A recurring discussion point centers around the ecological impact of the explosion and the state of environmental consciousness in 1970. Some commenters argue that the decision, while seemingly absurd in retrospect, might have been the best option available at the time given limited resources and understanding of whale decomposition. Others counter that alternative solutions, such as burying the whale, should have been explored. This leads to a broader discussion about the evolution of environmental awareness and waste disposal methods over the past decades.
There's a thread exploring the physics of the explosion, with users discussing the properties of whale blubber and the dynamics of explosions. Some speculate on the amount of explosives used and the force generated, attempting to reconcile the descriptions in the article with their understanding of physics.
Some commenters delve into the history of explosives use in similar situations, sharing articles and links about other attempts to dispose of large carcasses with varying degrees of success. This provides context to the Oregon incident and highlights the challenges involved in dealing with such events.
A few users express morbid curiosity about the smell and the aftermath of the explosion, painting a vivid picture of the scene. Others simply express their astonishment and amusement at the sheer absurdity of the event, labeling it as a quintessential "Oregon story." The thread also sees some darkly humorous comments and puns related to the incident.
Finally, some commenters express skepticism about the story itself, questioning the details presented in the linked article and prompting others to provide corroborating evidence and additional sources. This healthy skepticism adds another layer to the discussion and reinforces the importance of verifying information.