"The Maverick's Museum," reviewed in the Wall Street Journal, tells the captivating, if sometimes frustrating, story of Albert Barnes and his unique art collection. Author Henrietta McBurney paints a portrait of a complicated man, driven by both egalitarian ideals and a fiercely independent spirit, which led to both the groundbreaking educational program at his Barnes Foundation and his infamous battles against the Philadelphia art establishment. The book delves into Barnes' unconventional methods, from his focus on aesthetic experience over artistic pedigree to his embrace of African sculpture and Pennsylvania German furniture alongside masterpieces by Renoir and Cézanne. While acknowledging Barnes' flaws and dictatorial tendencies, McBurney ultimately celebrates his visionary approach to collecting and his enduring legacy.
French modernists held a complex and paradoxical relationship with the burgeoning mass media of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly newspapers. While they were disturbed by its perceived vulgarity, sensationalism, and homogenizing effects on culture, they were simultaneously fascinated by its dynamism, pervasiveness, and innovative visual language. Artists like Apollinaire, Braque, and Picasso incorporated newspaper fragments and stylistic elements into their work, both reflecting its growing dominance in daily life and attempting to harness its power for artistic expression. The newspaper became both a symbol of modernity's anxieties and a source of creative inspiration, embodying the era's chaotic yet exciting transformation.
HN commenters largely discussed the parallels between the modernist period's reaction to newspapers and the current reaction to the internet and social media. Some found the comparison apt, pointing out how both eras saw a surge of information, a change in how people consume media, and anxieties about its impact on attention spans and artistic creation. Others questioned the direct comparison, arguing that newspapers were a more curated and slower-paced medium than the internet. A few commenters highlighted the cyclical nature of technological advancements and the accompanying anxieties, suggesting this pattern repeats throughout history. One commenter offered a different perspective, focusing on the role of advertising in shaping both newspapers and the internet. Finally, a couple of users praised the Aeon article for its insightful analysis and engaging writing style.
Summary of Comments ( 2 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43394698
Hacker News users discuss the eccentric Albert Barnes, his unique art collection, and the book reviewing his life. Several commenters express interest in seeing the Barnes Foundation, noting its unusual hanging style and Barnes's specific viewing instructions. Some discuss the tension between preserving an artist's vision and making art accessible to a wider audience, questioning whether Barnes's rigid approach was ultimately beneficial. The debate touches upon the democratization of art and the role of institutions in shaping public access. Others share anecdotes or further information about Barnes, revealing his complex personality and the legal battles surrounding his collection. The overall sentiment seems to be one of intrigue and a desire to learn more about Barnes and his unconventional approach to art collecting.
The Hacker News post titled "The Maverick's Museum' Review: Albert Barnes and the Art of Collecting" has generated a modest number of comments, primarily focusing on Albert Barnes' eccentric personality and the unique nature of his art collection.
One commenter highlights Barnes' complicated relationship with the established art world, suggesting his unconventional approach and disdain for traditional art criticism stemmed from insecurity and a desire to control the narrative around his collection. This perspective paints Barnes as a complex figure motivated by a mix of genuine passion for art and a need for validation.
Another comment emphasizes the educational philosophy behind the Barnes Foundation, noting how Barnes intended the collection to be used for teaching and learning rather than mere aesthetic appreciation. This commenter expresses disappointment that the foundation's move to Philadelphia compromised this original vision, suggesting it became more of a traditional museum catering to a broader audience.
The accessibility of the collection is also discussed. A commenter points out the irony of Barnes' desire to make art accessible to working-class people while simultaneously making it incredibly difficult for anyone to actually see it. This underscores the contradictory nature of Barnes' approach, further emphasizing his complex personality.
One commenter briefly mentions the documentary "The Art of the Steal," recommending it for further insight into the controversy surrounding the Barnes Foundation's relocation.
Finally, a comment focuses on the unique hanging style of the Barnes collection, mentioning the mix of paintings, furniture, and metalwork displayed together. This reinforces the unconventional and highly personal nature of Barnes' curatorial approach, which prioritized his own aesthetic sensibilities over traditional museum practices.
While the comments aren't extensive, they provide a glimpse into various aspects of Albert Barnes and his legacy, touching upon his personality, educational goals, and the controversies surrounding his collection. They don't delve deeply into any single aspect, but offer a starting point for further exploration.