Stories with Tag co-op

• Exeter's unassuming co-op worker leads double life as 'Lord of the Logos'

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-05 15:54:01

  Verbose tl;dr

  By day, Dan Lane works at a Co-op in Exeter. By night, he's a globally recognized logo designer known as the "Lord of the Logos," creating iconic designs for bands like The Black Dahlia Murder and Aborted. His portfolio spans over 400 logos, including album artwork and merchandise designs for clients worldwide, a passion he pursues in his free time while maintaining his unassuming day job. He's built this impressive career largely through word-of-mouth and online networking within the metal music scene.

  In the bustling city of Exeter, a narrative of captivating duality unfolds, centering around the seemingly ordinary existence of a Co-op supermarket employee named Dan. By day, Dan diligently fulfills his responsibilities within the familiar aisles of the grocery store, engaging in the quotidian tasks of stocking shelves, assisting customers, and navigating the mundane realities of retail work. He presents an unassuming facade, blending seamlessly into the tapestry of everyday life, his true passions concealed beneath the veneer of his commonplace occupation. However, when the cloak of anonymity provided by his daytime employment is shed, Dan metamorphoses into a figure of considerable creative prowess, embracing the mantle of the "Lord of the Logos." This alter ego reveals a hidden depth, a wellspring of artistic talent dedicated to the intricate and often overlooked world of logo design.

  This remarkable dichotomy between the mundane and the masterful is the crux of Dan's story. It highlights the surprising juxtaposition of his seemingly ordinary life with the extraordinary nature of his artistic endeavors. While his days are filled with the practicalities of supermarket operations, his nights – and presumably any other free moments – are devoted to the meticulous craft of logo creation. He meticulously hones his skills, pouring his energy and imagination into crafting visual representations of brands and ideas. His dedication to this artistic pursuit has culminated in an impressive portfolio of over 500 logos, each a testament to his commitment and the flourishing of his creative spirit.

  This narrative showcases not only Dan's artistic talent but also the fascinating interplay between his public and private personas. It underscores the potential for hidden depths and unexpected passions to reside within individuals who might otherwise appear unremarkable. Dan's story serves as a compelling reminder that extraordinary creativity can flourish in the most unexpected of places, and that the seemingly mundane can coexist harmoniously with the truly remarkable. His dual existence as a Co-op worker and the "Lord of the Logos" is a testament to the multifaceted nature of human potential and the surprising ways in which individuals can pursue their passions while navigating the complexities of everyday life.

  • Exeter
  • Devon
  • UK
  • co-op
  • Graphic design
  • Logos
  • design
  • art
  • Community
  • Local News
  • Human Interest
  • Double Life
  • Worker
  • Artist
  • Profile

  Summary of Comments ( 60 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43594396

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters were generally unimpressed with the "Lord of the Logos" article. Several found the title misleading, as the designer's work, while prolific, wasn't particularly noteworthy or high-profile. Some criticized the writing style as hyperbolic and clickbaity, arguing the story wasn't deserving of such grand pronouncements. Others pointed out the irony of a Co-op employee designing logos for competing supermarkets. A few questioned the legality and ethics of designing logos for other companies while employed, especially given the potential for intellectual property conflicts. There was also a brief discussion about the prevalence of generic-looking logos.

  The Hacker News post about the Exeter Co-op worker who designs logos has a modest number of comments, mostly focusing on the juxtaposition of his ordinary day job and creative outlet. Several commenters express appreciation for his artistic talent and the unique designs he creates.

  One commenter highlights the "Lord of the Logos" moniker, finding it amusing and fitting. They also draw a parallel to Clark Kent/Superman, emphasizing the hidden talent beneath an unassuming exterior. This comparison resonates with other commenters, who enjoy the romantic notion of a secret identity.

  Another thread discusses the logos themselves, with some commenters praising their retro aesthetic and clever use of negative space. They point out the effectiveness of simple, yet memorable designs, and how they stand out in a world of overly complex logos.

  A few comments touch on the nature of creative work and the importance of having an outlet for self-expression, regardless of one's profession. They commend the designer for pursuing his passion alongside his day job.

  Some commenters express curiosity about the designer's process and how he balances his two roles. They wonder if he plans to transition to logo design full-time or continue his current arrangement.

  Overall, the comments reflect a positive reception to the article and a general admiration for the designer's artistic abilities and dedication to his craft. There isn't much in the way of controversy or debate, with most commenters simply sharing their appreciation for the story and the designs.

• Ask HN: Has anyone tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-18 14:05:20

  Verbose tl;dr

  The original poster is exploring alternative company structures, specifically cooperatives (co-ops), for a SaaS business and seeking others' experiences with this model. They're interested in understanding the practicalities, benefits, and drawbacks of running a SaaS as a co-op, particularly concerning attracting investment, distributing profits, and maintaining developer motivation. They wonder if the inherent democratic nature of co-ops might hinder rapid decision-making, a crucial aspect of the competitive SaaS landscape. Essentially, they're questioning whether the co-op model is compatible with the demands of building and scaling a successful SaaS company.

  The Hacker News post titled "Ask HN: Has anyone tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?" poses a question to the community regarding the viability and practicality of employing non-traditional organizational structures, specifically cooperative models, within the Software as a Service (SaaS) industry. The author expresses curiosity about whether any individuals or groups have experimented with such alternative models, seeking real-world examples and insights into their successes, challenges, and overall effectiveness. The core inquiry revolves around the potential compatibility of a cooperative framework, which emphasizes democratic decision-making and shared ownership, with the demands and dynamics of a SaaS business, which typically requires agility, rapid innovation, and potentially significant upfront investment. The author is implicitly asking whether the inherent structure of a cooperative, often associated with flatter hierarchies and distributed authority, could be advantageous or detrimental to navigating the competitive landscape of the SaaS market. The question implies a search for alternative approaches to building and running a SaaS company, potentially motivated by a desire for greater employee empowerment, equitable distribution of profits, or a more socially conscious business model. The author seeks information and experiences from others who may have ventured down this path, effectively crowdsourcing knowledge and perspectives on this less conventional approach to SaaS entrepreneurship.

  • SaaS
  • co-op
  • cooperative
  • alternative business models
  • business models
  • startups
  • software as a service
  • company structure
  • organizational structure
  • employee ownership
  • HN
  • Hacker News
  • Ask HN

  Summary of Comments ( 64 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42748394

  Verbose tl;dr

  Several commenters on the Hacker News thread discuss their experiences with or thoughts on alternative company models for SaaS, particularly co-ops. Some express skepticism about the scalability of co-ops for SaaS due to the capital-intensive nature of the business and the potential difficulty in attracting and retaining top talent without competitive salaries and equity. Others share examples of successful co-ops, highlighting the benefits of shared ownership, democratic decision-making, and profit-sharing. A few commenters suggest hybrid models, combining aspects of co-ops with traditional structures to balance the need for both stability and shared benefits. Some also point out the importance of clearly defining roles and responsibilities within a co-op to avoid common pitfalls. Finally, several comments emphasize the crucial role of shared values and a strong commitment to the co-op model for long-term success.

  The Hacker News post "Ask HN: Has anyone tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?" generated several comments exploring the feasibility and challenges of cooperative models for Software as a Service (SaaS) businesses.

  Some commenters expressed skepticism about the scalability of co-op models, particularly for ventures requiring significant upfront investment or rapid growth. They highlighted the potential difficulties in decision-making processes, profit distribution, and attracting external funding compared to traditional hierarchical structures. One commenter questioned the compatibility of democratic decision-making with the fast-paced, competitive nature of the SaaS market. Another raised concerns about the potential for disagreements among worker-owners to hinder agility and responsiveness. The difficulty in offering competitive salaries to attract top talent in a co-op model was also mentioned.

  Conversely, other commenters offered more optimistic perspectives, sharing examples of successful co-ops or suggesting strategies for overcoming potential hurdles. One commenter pointed to the potential benefits of increased employee engagement and motivation in a co-op structure, which could lead to higher quality products and services. Another suggested that platform co-ops, which connect independent workers rather than employing them directly, might be a more suitable model for some SaaS applications. The idea of a "steward-ownership" model, where the company is held in trust for a broader purpose rather than individual owners, was also mentioned as a potential alternative.

  Several comments focused on the practical aspects of implementing a co-op model, including legal considerations, governance structures, and profit-sharing mechanisms. One commenter recommended researching existing co-op legal frameworks and seeking advice from experienced cooperative businesses. Another emphasized the importance of clearly defining roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes within the co-op.

  The discussion also touched on the potential for co-op models to address issues of inequality and promote more equitable distribution of wealth within the tech industry. Some commenters argued that co-ops could offer a more sustainable and socially responsible alternative to traditional capitalist models.

  Overall, the comments reflected a diverse range of opinions on the viability and desirability of co-op models for SaaS businesses. While some expressed skepticism about the practical challenges, others highlighted the potential benefits and suggested strategies for successful implementation. The discussion revealed a significant interest in exploring alternative company models and a desire to create more equitable and sustainable businesses within the tech sector.