Belgian artist Dries Depoorter created "The Flemish Scrollers," an art project using AI to detect and publicly shame Belgian politicians caught using their phones during parliamentary livestreams. The project automatically clips videos of these instances and posts them to a Twitter bot account, tagging the politicians involved. Depoorter aims to highlight politicians' potential inattentiveness during official proceedings.
The Register reports that Google collects and transmits Android user data, including hardware identifiers and location, to its servers even before a user opens any apps or completes device setup. This pre-setup data collection involves several Google services and occurs during the initial boot process, transmitting information like IMEI, hardware serial number, SIM serial number, and nearby Wi-Fi access point details. While Google claims this data is crucial for essential services like fraud prevention and software updates, the article raises privacy concerns, particularly because users are not informed of this data collection nor given the opportunity to opt out. This behavior raises questions about the balance between user privacy and Google's data collection practices.
HN commenters discuss the implications of Google's data collection on Android even before app usage. Some highlight the irony of Google's privacy claims contrasted with their extensive tracking. Several express resignation, suggesting this behavior is expected from Google and other large tech companies. One commenter mentions a study showing Google collecting data even when location services are disabled, and another points to the difficulty of truly opting out of this tracking without significant technical knowledge. The discussion also touches upon the limitations of using alternative Android ROMs or de-Googled phones, acknowledging their usability compromises. There's a general sense of pessimism about the ability of users to control their data in the Android ecosystem.
The article explores using a 9eSIM SIM card to enable eSIM functionality on devices with only physical SIM slots. The 9eSIM card acts as a bridge, allowing users to provision and switch between multiple eSIM profiles on their device through a companion app, effectively turning a physical SIM slot into an eSIM-capable one. The author details their experience setting up and using the 9eSIM with both Android and Linux, highlighting the benefits of managing multiple eSIM profiles without needing a physically dual-SIM device. While the process isn't entirely seamless, particularly on Linux, the 9eSIM offers a practical workaround for using eSIMs on older or incompatible hardware.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and security implications of using a 9eSIM to bridge the gap between eSIM-only services and devices with physical SIM slots. Some expressed concerns about the security of adding another layer into the communication chain, questioning the trustworthiness of the 9eSIM provider and the potential for vulnerabilities. Others were skeptical of the use case, pointing out that most devices support either physical SIM or eSIM, not both simultaneously, making the 9eSIM's functionality somewhat niche. The lack of open-source firmware for the 9eSIM also drew criticism, highlighting the difficulty in independently verifying its security. A few commenters saw potential in specific situations, such as using the 9eSIM as a backup or for managing multiple eSIM profiles on a single physical SIM device. Overall, the sentiment was cautiously curious, with many acknowledging the cleverness of the solution but remaining hesitant about its real-world security and usefulness.
TCL is betting on "NXTPAPER" screen technology, which aims to mimic the look and feel of paper for a more comfortable reading experience. This technology utilizes multiple layers of reflective material to enhance contrast and reduce blue light, creating a display that appears brighter in sunlight than typical LCDs while maintaining low power consumption. While not e-ink, NXTPAPER 2.0 boasts improved color gamut and refresh rates, making it suitable for not just e-readers, but also tablets and potentially laptops. TCL aims to expand this technology across its product lines, offering a paper-like alternative to traditional screens.
Hacker News commenters discuss TCL's NxtPaper display technology, generally expressing skepticism about its widespread adoption. Some doubt the claimed power savings, especially given the backlight required for color displays. Others question the "paper-like" feel and wonder if it truly offers advantages over existing e-ink or LCD technologies for typical use cases. A few commenters express interest, particularly for niche applications like e-readers or note-taking, but overall the sentiment is cautious, awaiting real-world reviews and comparisons to determine if the technology lives up to its promises. Some also discuss the history of similar display technologies and their ultimate lack of success.
Summary of Comments ( 105 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43278473
HN commenters largely criticized the project for being creepy and invasive, raising privacy concerns about publicly shaming politicians for normal behavior. Some questioned the legality and ethics of facial recognition used in this manner, particularly without consent. Several pointed out the potential for misuse and the chilling effect on free speech. A few commenters found the project amusing or a clever use of technology, but these were in the minority. The practicality and effectiveness of the project were also questioned, with some suggesting politicians could easily circumvent it. There was a brief discussion about the difference between privacy expectations in public vs. private settings, but the overall sentiment was strongly against the project.
The Hacker News comments section for the post "Automatically tagging politician when they use their phone on the livestreams" (regarding the project "The Flemish Scrollers") contains a robust discussion with a variety of perspectives on the project's implications.
Several commenters express concerns about privacy and surveillance. They question the ethics of publicly shaming politicians for using their phones, arguing that it's a form of public shaming and doesn't necessarily indicate wrongdoing. Some highlight the potential for misuse of this technology and the slippery slope towards increased surveillance of individuals. The idea that this could normalize such tracking and lead to its application to everyday citizens is a recurring worry. Some also point out the potential for false positives and the lack of context surrounding phone usage. A politician might be responding to an urgent matter or using their phone for work-related tasks, and the automatic tagging system doesn't differentiate between these scenarios.
Others see the project as a valuable tool for transparency and accountability. They argue that it holds politicians accountable for their attention during public sessions and allows the public to see how engaged their representatives are. Some suggest that it could discourage distractions and encourage politicians to be more present during important discussions. The sentiment that the public has a right to know what their elected officials are doing is prevalent in these comments.
A few commenters discuss the technical aspects of the project, including the use of facial recognition and AI. They delve into the accuracy of the system and the potential for biases in the algorithms. Some express interest in the technical implementation details and the challenges involved in identifying individuals and tracking their phone usage in real-time.
There's also a discussion about the broader implications of this technology beyond just politicians. Some commenters speculate about its potential use in other contexts, such as monitoring student attention in classrooms or employee engagement in meetings. The ethical implications of such applications are debated, with some arguing that it could be a useful tool while others express concern about the potential for abuse.
Finally, a handful of comments offer alternative perspectives or humorous takes on the situation. Some suggest that the project is more of an art piece or social commentary than a practical tool. Others joke about the potential reactions of politicians to being caught using their phones.
Overall, the comments section reveals a complex and nuanced discussion about the project's ethical, technical, and societal implications. There is a clear divide between those who see it as a positive step towards transparency and accountability and those who view it as a potentially invasive form of surveillance. The discussion highlights the important questions surrounding the use of AI and facial recognition technology in public spaces and the balance between privacy and public access to information.