Stories with Tag e-ink

• Show HN: I made my own TRMNL e-ink device

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-24 11:34:10

  Verbose tl;dr

  Stavros Korokithakis built a custom e-ink terminal using a Raspberry Pi Zero W, a Pimoroni Inky Impression 7.7" display, and a custom 3D-printed case. Motivated by a desire for a distraction-free writing environment and inspired by the now-defunct TRMNL project, he documented the entire process, from assembling the hardware and designing the case to setting up the software and optimizing power consumption. The result is a portable, low-power e-ink terminal ideal for focused writing and coding.

  Stavros Korokithakis, driven by a desire for a minimalist, distraction-free writing device and inspired by the now-defunct TRMNL project, meticulously documented the process of building his own e-ink based terminal. He began by acquiring a 7.8-inch Waveshare e-paper display, chosen for its larger size compared to the original TRMNL's 4.2-inch screen. Recognizing the limitations of the display's SPI interface for text-heavy applications, he opted to utilize the faster HDMI interface via a Waveshare e-paper driver board. This board requires a dedicated HDMI input, necessitating a compact single-board computer to drive the display.

  After researching various options, including the Raspberry Pi Zero and CHIP, he selected the Rock Pi S for its small form factor, low power consumption, and crucial HDMI output capability. He meticulously detailed the steps involved in assembling the hardware, emphasizing the challenges of working with the small components and the need for careful soldering. The case design was a significant undertaking, requiring precise measurements and multiple iterations using OpenSCAD, a 3D modeling software. He opted for a sleek, minimalist design reminiscent of the original TRMNL, fabricating it using a 3D printer.

  Software setup involved flashing the appropriate operating system image onto the Rock Pi S and configuring it for use with the e-paper display. He explained the process of setting up a serial console for initial access and troubleshooting, and further refined the system to boot directly into a terminal environment optimized for the e-ink screen. This included utilizing a framebuffer driver specifically designed for the Waveshare display and configuring the system to refresh the screen only when necessary to minimize flickering and conserve power. The resulting device functions as a portable, self-contained terminal ideal for focused writing and coding tasks, fulfilling his initial vision of a modern, minimalist writing tool. He concludes by expressing satisfaction with the outcome and hinting at future improvements, such as integrating a keyboard and potentially exploring alternative display technologies.

  • e-ink
  • trmnl
  • DIY
  • Hardware
  • Electronics
  • Device
  • portable
  • terminal
  • Linux
  • Show HN
  • keyboard
  • Raspberry Pi
  • custom build
  • mobile computing
  • cyberdeck

  Summary of Comments ( 5 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43781465

  Verbose tl;dr

  Commenters on Hacker News largely praised the project for its ambition, ingenuity, and clean design. Several expressed interest in purchasing a similar device, highlighting the desire for a distraction-free writing tool. Some offered constructive criticism, suggesting improvements like a larger screen, alternative keyboard layouts, and the ability to sync with cloud services. A few commenters delved into technical aspects, discussing the choice of e-ink display, the microcontroller used, and the potential for open-sourcing the project. The overall sentiment leaned towards admiration for the creator's dedication and the device's potential.

  The Hacker News post "Show HN: I made my own TRMNL e-ink device" (linking to an article about creating a custom e-ink terminal) generated a moderate amount of discussion, with a mix of praise, curiosity, and constructive criticism.

  Several commenters expressed admiration for the project, calling it "cool," "awesome," and "badass." They appreciated the creator's ingenuity and the novelty of a dedicated e-ink terminal device. Some specifically highlighted the appeal of a distraction-free writing environment offered by such a device.

  A recurring theme in the comments was curiosity about the device's practicality and use cases. Commenters questioned whether the slow refresh rate of e-ink would be a hindrance for tasks beyond simple text editing and reading. They also wondered about the device's responsiveness and the overall user experience compared to traditional terminals or laptops.

  Some commenters offered suggestions for improvement, such as exploring different e-ink displays with faster refresh rates or incorporating features like a backlight for use in low-light conditions. One commenter suggested using a larger display, while another proposed adding a physical keyboard for a more comfortable typing experience.

  The discussion also touched upon the potential benefits of e-ink for focused work and the desire for minimalist computing devices. One commenter mentioned the similar philosophy behind the Freewrite Traveler, a dedicated writing device with an e-ink screen.

  A few commenters inquired about the project's open-source status and the possibility of building their own TRMNL devices. The creator responded by confirming the project is open source and providing a link to the GitHub repository.

  While there wasn't a single overwhelmingly compelling comment, the collective discussion provided valuable feedback and insights into the potential and limitations of the TRMNL device. The comments demonstrated a genuine interest in the project and a shared appreciation for innovative hardware solutions.

• Evertop: E-ink IBM XT clone with 100+ hours of battery life

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-21 22:07:49

  Verbose tl;dr

  The Evertop is a DIY open-source project aiming to create a modern, portable, and extremely low-power IBM XT compatible computer. It features a 4.2" e-ink display, mechanical keyboard, and boasts over 100 hours of battery life. Based on a Raspberry Pi Pico microcontroller emulating an NEC V20 processor, it can run original IBM XT software and DOS games. The project includes custom-designed PCBs and 3D-printed case files, making it reproducible for others. While still under development, the Evertop represents a unique blend of retro computing and modern hardware for a highly portable and energy-efficient experience.

  Eric Jenott has embarked on a fascinating project called "Evertop," meticulously documented on GitHub. This ambitious undertaking involves the creation of a modern homage to the venerable IBM XT, a cornerstone of early personal computing, but with a significant twist: the integration of an e-ink display and ultra-low power consumption for extended battery life. Jenott's goal is to achieve over 100 hours of operational time on a single charge, enabling extended periods of unplugged use.

  The Evertop project leverages the versatility and accessibility of modern electronic components while capturing the essence of the original IBM XT. Jenott's design incorporates a Raspberry Pi RP2040 microcontroller, chosen for its performance and efficiency, to emulate the functionality of the original XT hardware. This emulation allows for the execution of original XT software and provides a nostalgic computing experience. A crucial departure from the original XT design is the substitution of the traditional CRT monitor with a low-power e-ink display. This technology allows for a persistent image even when power is not actively being supplied to the display, drastically reducing energy consumption.

  The project's documentation meticulously details the hardware and software aspects of the Evertop build. Schematics, PCB layouts, and source code are publicly available, fostering community involvement and enabling others to replicate or contribute to the project. The chosen hardware components are carefully considered for their power efficiency, size, and compatibility with the RP2040. Software development focuses on optimizing the XT emulation for the RP2040 and integrating the e-ink display seamlessly with the emulated system. Jenott's design also prioritizes portability and a compact form factor, making the Evertop a potentially highly mobile retrocomputing device. The project is ongoing, with updates and advancements regularly documented on the GitHub repository, showcasing the iterative development process and providing insights into the challenges and solutions encountered during the creation of this unique device.

  • e-ink
  • IBM XT
  • Clone
  • Retrocomputing
  • vintage computing
  • portable computer
  • long battery life
  • Low Power
  • DIY
  • Open Source Hardware
  • Single Board Computer
  • keyboard computer
  • electronic ink display
  • Evertop

  Summary of Comments ( 166 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43757037

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters generally expressed enthusiasm for the Evertop project, praising its unique combination of retro computing and modern e-ink technology. Several highlighted the impressive battery life and the appeal of a distraction-free writing device. Some questioned the practicality given the slow refresh rate of e-ink, particularly for gaming, while others suggested improvements like backlighting and a more ergonomic keyboard. A few commenters expressed interest in similar projects using different retro hardware, such as the Apple II or Commodore 64. There was also discussion about the challenges of sourcing parts and the potential market for such a niche device. Several users shared their personal experiences with similar e-ink projects and offered technical insights.

  The Hacker News post about the Evertop, an e-ink IBM XT clone, generated a fair amount of discussion, with many commenters expressing enthusiasm for the project.

  Several users focused on the impressive battery life. One commenter questioned how 100+ hours was achieved, prompting a reply explaining that the low-power nature of e-ink displays is the primary contributing factor. This led to further discussion about the power consumption of different components in the system and general power optimization strategies for low-power computing.

  The choice of an XT clone as the basis for the project also sparked conversation. Some users reminisced about their experiences with XT machines, while others questioned the practicality of the platform in a modern context. One commenter suggested that a more modern, but still low-power, platform like a Raspberry Pi might be a better choice, offering more flexibility and software options. This prompted counter-arguments about the simplicity and robustness of the XT architecture, and its suitability for specific use cases where a full-fledged operating system isn't necessary.

  The e-ink display itself was a major point of interest. Some commenters expressed concerns about the refresh rate and its limitations for certain applications, particularly those involving animation or video. Others highlighted the benefits of e-ink in terms of readability in sunlight and low power consumption, suggesting applications like e-readers or dedicated coding environments. The discussion also touched upon the different types of e-ink displays and their varying characteristics.

  Several commenters expressed interest in purchasing an Evertop, inquiring about pricing and availability. There was also discussion around the potential for DIY builds, with some users sharing links to similar projects and resources.

  Finally, the developer of the Evertop, Eric Jenott, participated in the thread, answering questions about the project's design choices, technical specifications, and future plans. This direct interaction with the creator added significant value to the discussion, providing insights not available elsewhere.

• Uncovering a 0-Click RCE in the SuperNote Nomad E-Ink Tablet

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-07 20:51:02

  Verbose tl;dr

  Security researchers at Prizm Labs discovered a critical zero-click remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the SuperNote Nomad e-ink tablet. Exploiting a flaw in the device's update mechanism, an attacker could remotely execute arbitrary code with root privileges by sending a specially crafted OTA update notification via a malicious Wi-Fi access point. The attack requires no user interaction, making it particularly dangerous. The vulnerability stemmed from insufficient validation of update packages, allowing malicious firmware to be installed. Prizm Labs responsibly disclosed the vulnerability to SuperNote, who promptly released a patch. This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust security measures even in seemingly simple devices like e-readers.

  This blog post by Prizm Labs details the discovery and exploitation of a zero-click remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the SuperNote A5X and A6X e-ink tablets, specifically those running firmware version 3.4.0.33. A zero-click exploit allows an attacker to compromise a device without requiring any interaction from the user. The vulnerability stemmed from the insecure implementation of the OTA (Over-The-Air) update mechanism.

  The researchers began their investigation by analyzing the network traffic during an OTA update. They observed that the update process involved downloading a signed firmware image via HTTPS. While the use of HTTPS provided encryption, it did not protect against malicious manipulation if the attacker could compromise the update server or perform a man-in-the-middle attack. Crucially, the researchers found that the device did not validate the signature of the downloaded update package before writing it to the internal flash memory. This oversight allowed them to craft a malicious firmware update package containing arbitrary code.

  The exploit process involved several steps. First, a malicious update package was constructed. This package contained a modified boot image, effectively replacing the legitimate SuperNote operating system with a malicious one. The malicious boot image included a modified init script designed to establish a reverse shell back to the attacker's machine, granting them full control over the device.

  To deliver the malicious update, the researchers leveraged a classic man-in-the-middle attack technique, using ARP spoofing. ARP spoofing allows an attacker to intercept traffic intended for another device on the local network by impersonating its MAC address. By poisoning the ARP cache of the SuperNote device, the researchers redirected the device's OTA update request to their own malicious server, hosting the crafted update package.

  When the SuperNote attempted to update, it downloaded the malicious package from the attacker's server. Due to the lack of pre-installation signature verification, the device accepted and applied the malicious update. Upon reboot, the modified init script within the malicious boot image executed, establishing the reverse shell and granting the attacker complete control. This access allowed them to execute arbitrary commands, exfiltrate sensitive data, and essentially take full ownership of the device.

  The researchers highlighted the severity of this vulnerability, as it permitted silent and remote compromise of the targeted device. They responsibly disclosed the vulnerability to Ratta Supernote, the manufacturer of the device, who subsequently released a patched firmware version addressing the issue. The post concludes by emphasizing the importance of secure OTA update implementations and the need for robust security measures in internet-connected devices.

  • SuperNote
  • Nomad
  • e-ink
  • tablet
  • RCE
  • remote code execution
  • 0-click
  • Exploit
  • Vulnerability
  • Security
  • Cybersecurity
  • Hardware Security
  • Firmware
  • Rootkit
  • Prizm Labs

  Summary of Comments ( 8 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43615805

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters generally praised the research and write-up for its clarity and depth. Several expressed concern about the Supernote's security posture, especially given its marketing towards privacy-conscious users. Some questioned the practicality of the exploit given its reliance on connecting to a malicious Wi-Fi network, but others pointed out the potential for rogue access points or compromised legitimate networks. A few users discussed the inherent difficulties in securing embedded devices and the trade-offs between functionality and security. The exploit's dependence on a user-initiated firmware update process was also highlighted, suggesting a slightly reduced risk compared to a fully automatic exploit. Some commenters shared their experiences with Supernote's customer support and device management, while others debated the overall significance of the vulnerability in the context of real-world threats.

  The Hacker News post discussing the 0-click RCE vulnerability in the SuperNote Nomad E-Ink tablet has generated a number of comments exploring various aspects of the vulnerability, its implications, and the SuperNote device itself.

  Several commenters focus on the trade-offs between security and desired functionality, particularly regarding the device's cloud syncing feature. Some argue that the always-on nature of the sync feature, necessary for its intended seamless functionality, inherently increases the risk profile. The decision by SuperNote to leave Wi-Fi always enabled, even when the device is powered off, is highlighted as a key contributing factor to the vulnerability. The discussion touches upon the inherent difficulty of securing devices that require constant network connectivity.

  The technical details of the vulnerability also receive attention. Commenters discuss the specifics of the exploit, including the use of maliciously crafted emails and the exploitation of a stack overflow vulnerability in the device's email client. The discussion highlights the importance of robust input sanitization and secure coding practices to prevent such vulnerabilities. Some commenters question the choice of technology used for the email client, suggesting that a simpler, less feature-rich implementation might have been more secure.

  A recurring theme in the comments is the security of e-ink devices in general. Several users express concerns about the potential for similar vulnerabilities in other e-ink devices and the broader implications for the security of internet-connected devices in general. The relatively closed nature of the SuperNote ecosystem is also brought up, with some commenters suggesting that this may have contributed to the vulnerability going unnoticed for a longer period.

  Several commenters praise the researchers for their responsible disclosure and the detailed write-up of the vulnerability. They acknowledge the importance of such research in improving the security of these devices.

  Some comments delve into the practical implications of the vulnerability, discussing the potential for data theft and other malicious activities. The potential impact on users' privacy is a particular concern, given the sensitive nature of information often stored on such devices.

  Finally, a few comments discuss the response from SuperNote, noting the company's acknowledgement of the vulnerability and their commitment to releasing a patch. There's some discussion about the timeliness of the response and the broader implications for the trust and reputation of the SuperNote brand.

• Ghostwriter – use the reMarkable2 as an interface to vision-LLMs

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-08 03:02:57

  Verbose tl;dr

  Ghostwriter is a project that transforms the reMarkable 2 tablet into an interface for interacting with large language models (LLMs). It leverages the tablet's natural handwriting capabilities to send handwritten prompts to an LLM and displays the generated text response directly on the e-ink screen. Essentially, it allows users to write naturally and receive LLM-generated text, all within the distraction-free environment of the reMarkable 2. The project is open-source and allows for customization, including choosing the LLM and adjusting various settings.

  The GitHub repository titled "Ghostwriter" introduces a novel approach to interacting with large language models (LLMs) like Vision-LLMs, specifically Google's Gemini, by leveraging the reMarkable2 tablet as a primary input and output device. This project aims to create a more natural and intuitive writing experience by combining the tactile feel of handwriting on the reMarkable2 with the generative capabilities of advanced LLMs.

  The system functions by capturing handwritten text and simple drawings created on the reMarkable2. This input data is then transmitted to a server, where it is interpreted and subsequently fed as prompts to a Vision-LLM. The LLM processes these prompts, generating responses based on the provided handwritten input, effectively using the visual information directly. These responses, which can include generated text, code, or even images in response to sketched diagrams, are then returned to the reMarkable2 screen for display. This creates a closed loop where the user writes or draws on the tablet, the LLM interprets and responds, and the response is displayed back on the reMarkable2, facilitating a dynamic and interactive exchange with the LLM.

  Ghostwriter employs a multi-stage process to achieve this functionality. Initially, it utilizes the rm2fb utility to establish a framebuffer connection with the reMarkable2, allowing real-time access to the screen content. Changes in the framebuffer are monitored to detect new handwritten input. This new input is then extracted, processed for clarity and legibility, and converted into a format suitable for the Vision-LLM. The processed input is then sent as a prompt to the LLM via an API call. The LLM’s generated output is subsequently received by the server and formatted appropriately for display on the reMarkable2. Finally, the formatted response is transmitted back to the tablet, updating the display and presenting the LLM's output to the user. This entire cycle repeats, allowing for continuous interaction and a seamless back-and-forth between user input and LLM generation, all mediated through the reMarkable2 interface. The aim is to provide a more fluid and engaging experience than traditional keyboard-and-mouse interaction with LLMs, mimicking the intuitive nature of working with pen and paper while harnessing the power of advanced AI models.

  • reMarkable2
  • tablet
  • e-ink
  • handwriting
  • digital writing
  • LLM
  • Large Language Model
  • vision-LLM
  • Interface
  • ghostwriter
  • Note-taking
  • OCR
  • Optical Character Recognition
  • AI
  • artificial intelligence
  • productivity
  • Software
  • GitHub
  • Open Source

  Summary of Comments ( 70 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42979986

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters generally expressed excitement about Ghostwriter, particularly its potential for integrating handwritten input with LLMs. Several users pointed out the limitations of existing tablet-based coding solutions and saw Ghostwriter as a promising alternative. Some questioned the practicality of handwriting code extensively, while others emphasized its usefulness for diagrams, note-taking, and mathematical formulas, especially when combined with LLM capabilities. The discussion touched upon the desire for similar functionality with other tablets like the iPad and speculated on potential applications in education and creative fields. A few commenters expressed interest in the open-source nature of the project and its potential for customization.

  The Hacker News thread linked (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42979986) discusses the "Ghostwriter" project, which allows users to leverage their reMarkable 2 tablet as an input device for vision-language models (VLMs). The discussion is relatively brief, consisting of only a few comments, and doesn't delve deeply into the project's merits or drawbacks. It doesn't present any highly compelling arguments or particularly insightful perspectives.

  One user questions the practical application of the project, wondering if there's a genuine use case beyond its novelty. They ponder what real-world problem this solves and suggest alternative, potentially more efficient methods for interacting with VLMs, like using a phone's camera. This comment reflects a common sentiment towards new technologies, questioning its purpose beyond the initial "cool" factor.

  Another commenter expresses a desire to see similar functionality for other e-ink devices, specifically mentioning the Onyx Boox. This suggests a potential interest in the broader application of e-ink tablets as interfaces for AI models and highlights a user base looking for expanded compatibility.

  A third comment very briefly mentions using the reMarkable tablet for note-taking while coding, indirectly hinting at a possible use case for Ghostwriter. However, the connection isn't explicitly made, and the commenter doesn't elaborate on how Ghostwriter might fit into that workflow.

  Overall, the discussion is limited and primarily focuses on initial reactions and potential future applications rather than a detailed analysis of Ghostwriter itself. It doesn't offer a wealth of compelling insights, mainly expressing curiosity, suggestions for broader compatibility, and a questioning of the project's practical utility.

• Tcl's bet on screens that look like paper

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-15 12:50:15

  Verbose tl;dr

  TCL is betting on "NXTPAPER" screen technology, which aims to mimic the look and feel of paper for a more comfortable reading experience. This technology utilizes multiple layers of reflective material to enhance contrast and reduce blue light, creating a display that appears brighter in sunlight than typical LCDs while maintaining low power consumption. While not e-ink, NXTPAPER 2.0 boasts improved color gamut and refresh rates, making it suitable for not just e-readers, but also tablets and potentially laptops. TCL aims to expand this technology across its product lines, offering a paper-like alternative to traditional screens.

  This blog post by Gergely Orosz delves into TCL's strategic investment in "NXTPAPER," a display technology designed to mimic the appearance and feel of paper. The author meticulously examines TCL's rationale for pursuing this technology, analyzing it within the broader context of the display market and the company's product portfolio. Orosz begins by highlighting the growing demand for e-ink displays, particularly in e-readers, and the limitations of this technology, such as low refresh rates and limited color reproduction. This sets the stage for introducing TCL's NXTPAPER, which aims to bridge the gap between the comfortable readability of e-ink and the vibrancy and responsiveness of traditional LCD or OLED screens.

  The core of the post focuses on the technical underpinnings of NXTPAPER. Orosz explains that it's not an entirely new display technology but rather a combination of existing LCD technology and a highly reflective layered display stack. He details how this layered structure, which includes a dedicated reflective layer and multiple optical films, minimizes backlight reliance, thereby reducing power consumption and achieving a paper-like effect. The author emphasizes the importance of ambient light in NXTPAPER's functionality, contrasting it with emissive displays that generate their own light. He further elaborates on the technology's advantages, including reduced blue light emission, a claimed 65% reduction compared to typical LCDs, which contributes to improved eye comfort. The post also discusses color reproduction capabilities of NXTPAPER, noting that while it doesn't achieve the wide color gamuts of high-end displays, it offers acceptable color performance for everyday use.

  Orosz further analyzes TCL's market positioning for NXTPAPER. He observes that TCL is initially targeting the tablet and e-reader segment, aiming to provide a more versatile and colorful alternative to traditional e-ink devices. He also speculates about the potential application of NXTPAPER in other product categories, such as laptops, particularly given the increasing demand for devices suitable for both work and content consumption. The author concludes by discussing the potential challenges and opportunities facing TCL's NXTPAPER technology, acknowledging the competitive landscape and the need for further development to fully realize its potential. He raises questions about the technology's long-term viability and its ability to compete with established display technologies, ultimately positioning NXTPAPER as an intriguing development worth watching in the evolving world of display technology.

  • TCL
  • NxtPaper
  • display technology
  • e-paper
  • e-ink
  • reflective display
  • low power display
  • eye strain
  • reading comfort
  • screen technology
  • mobile devices
  • tablets
  • e-readers

  Summary of Comments ( 38 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42710296

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters discuss TCL's NxtPaper display technology, generally expressing skepticism about its widespread adoption. Some doubt the claimed power savings, especially given the backlight required for color displays. Others question the "paper-like" feel and wonder if it truly offers advantages over existing e-ink or LCD technologies for typical use cases. A few commenters express interest, particularly for niche applications like e-readers or note-taking, but overall the sentiment is cautious, awaiting real-world reviews and comparisons to determine if the technology lives up to its promises. Some also discuss the history of similar display technologies and their ultimate lack of success.

  The Hacker News post "Tcl's bet on screens that look like paper" generated a moderate amount of discussion with 24 comments. Several commenters focused on the practical implications and potential applications of the NxtPaper technology.

  One commenter expressed skepticism about the "reflective LCD" description, arguing that it likely functions more like e-ink and questioning the claimed power savings for video playback. This sparked a short thread discussing the potential use of a backlight and how it might affect battery life compared to traditional LCDs.

  Another user highlighted the importance of clarifying the refresh rate, especially given the marketing around "video." They pointed out that even a slightly slow refresh rate can significantly impact the user experience, making it unsuitable for smooth video playback.

  A few comments centered around the niche appeal of such displays. One commenter suggested that devices with this technology could be ideal for reading in direct sunlight, addressing a common shortcoming of traditional screens. Another pointed out the potential for educational uses, particularly in developing countries where power consumption is a major concern.

  Several users brought up comparisons with existing e-ink devices, particularly those from Remarkable and Onyx Boox. They discussed the trade-offs between refresh rate, color accuracy, and power consumption, suggesting that NxtPaper might occupy a middle ground between e-ink and traditional LCDs.

  One commenter shared a personal anecdote about using a reMarkable tablet, praising its paper-like feel but lamenting the lack of backlighting for use in low-light conditions. This tied back to the earlier discussion about the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating a backlight in NxtPaper devices.

  A couple of commenters expressed concerns about TCL's track record with software updates and customer support. They questioned whether the company would provide adequate long-term support for devices using this technology.

  Finally, a few comments simply expressed interest in the technology and hoped to see wider adoption in the future. Overall, the comments reflect a cautious optimism about NxtPaper, acknowledging its potential benefits while also raising valid concerns about its practical limitations and TCL's ability to deliver a compelling product.