Confident AI, a YC W25 startup, has launched an open-source evaluation framework designed specifically for LLM-powered applications. It allows developers to define custom evaluation metrics and test their applications against diverse test cases, helping identify weaknesses and edge cases. The framework aims to move beyond simple accuracy measurements to provide more nuanced and actionable insights into LLM app performance, ultimately fostering greater confidence in deployed AI systems. The project is available on GitHub and the team encourages community contributions.
Little Snitch has a hidden "Deep Packet Inspection" feature accessible via a secret keyboard shortcut (Control-click on the connection alert, then press Command-I). This allows users to examine the actual data being sent or received by a connection, going beyond just seeing the IP addresses and ports. This functionality can be invaluable for troubleshooting network issues, identifying the specific data a suspicious application is transmitting, or even understanding the inner workings of network protocols. While potentially powerful, this feature is undocumented and requires some technical knowledge to interpret the raw data displayed.
HN users largely discuss their experiences with Little Snitch and similar firewall tools. Some highlight the "deny once" option as a valuable but less-known feature, appreciating its granularity compared to permanently blocking connections. Others mention alternative tools like LuLu and Vallum, drawing comparisons to Little Snitch's functionality and ease of use. A few users question the necessity of such tools in modern macOS, citing Apple's built-in security features. Several commenters express frustration with software increasingly phoning home, emphasizing the importance of tools like Little Snitch for maintaining privacy and control. The discussion also touches upon the effectiveness of Little Snitch against malware, with some suggesting its primary benefit is awareness rather than outright prevention.
After October 14, 2025, Microsoft 365 apps like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint will no longer receive security updates or technical support on Windows 10. While the apps will still technically function, using them on an unsupported OS poses security risks. Microsoft encourages users to upgrade to Windows 11 to continue receiving support and maintain the security and functionality of their Microsoft 365 applications.
HN commenters largely discuss the implications of Microsoft ending support for Office apps on Windows 10. Several express frustration with Microsoft's push to upgrade to Windows 11, viewing it as a forced upgrade and an attempt to increase Microsoft 365 subscriptions. Some highlight the inconvenience this poses for users with older hardware incompatible with Windows 11. Others note the potential security risks of using unsupported software and the eventual necessity of upgrading. A few commenters point out the continuing support for Office 2019, although with limited functionality updates, and discuss the alternative of using web-based Office apps or open-source office suites like LibreOffice. Some speculate this is a move to bolster Microsoft 365 subscriptions, making offline productivity increasingly dependent on the service.
Summary of Comments ( 20 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43116633
Hacker News users discussed Confident AI's potential, limitations, and the broader landscape of LLM evaluation. Some expressed skepticism about the "confidence" aspect, arguing that true confidence in LLMs is still a significant challenge and questioning how the framework addresses edge cases and unexpected inputs. Others were more optimistic, seeing value in a standardized evaluation framework, especially for comparing different LLM applications. Several commenters pointed out existing similar tools and initiatives, highlighting the growing ecosystem around LLM evaluation and prompting discussion about Confident AI's unique contributions. The open-source nature of the project was generally praised, with some users expressing interest in contributing. There was also discussion about the practicality of the proposed metrics and the need for more nuanced evaluation beyond simple pass/fail criteria.
The Hacker News post for "Launch HN: Confident AI (YC W25) – Open-source evaluation framework for LLM apps" has generated a moderate amount of discussion, with a number of commenters expressing interest and raising relevant points.
Several commenters focused on the practical applications and benefits of Confident AI's framework. One user highlighted the importance of evaluating LLMs not just on general benchmarks, but specifically on the tasks they're intended for within an application. They appreciated that Confident AI addresses this need. Another commenter pointed out the challenge of shifting from evaluating individual LLM outputs to assessing the overall reliability of an application built upon them, praising Confident AI's approach to this problem. The ability to measure and improve the reliability of LLM-powered apps was seen as a significant advantage by multiple commenters.
Some discussion centered around the open-source nature of the project and its potential impact. One user expressed excitement about the possibility of contributing and shaping the future of the tool. The choice to open-source the framework was viewed positively, fostering community involvement and potentially accelerating development.
Several comments delved into the technical aspects of the framework. One commenter inquired about the specific metrics used for evaluation, demonstrating an interest in the underlying methodology. Another user engaged in a discussion with the creators of Confident AI regarding the framework's compatibility with different LLM providers and the flexibility it offers for customizing evaluation criteria. This technical discussion highlighted the practical considerations of integrating such a framework into existing LLM workflows.
A few commenters offered constructive criticism and suggestions. One user suggested integrating with existing CI/CD pipelines for more seamless incorporation into development workflows. Another pointed out the importance of considering the computational cost of running evaluations, especially for complex LLM applications. These comments contributed to a productive discussion about the practical challenges and potential improvements for the framework.
While no single comment could be considered overwhelmingly compelling on its own, the collective discussion provided valuable insights into the community's reception of Confident AI, highlighting its potential benefits, addressing technical considerations, and offering constructive feedback for future development.