The blog post details a streamlined workflow for applying Git patches emailed as attachments directly within Apple Mail. It leverages a custom Mail rule and an AppleScript to automatically save .patch or .diff attachments to a temporary directory. The script then opens a Terminal window in that directory, enabling the user to quickly apply the patch using git am. This eliminates the manual steps of downloading, locating, and applying patches received via email, significantly improving efficiency for developers working with patch-based workflows.
gmail-to-sqlite is a Python tool that allows users to download and store their Gmail data in a local SQLite database. It leverages the Gmail API to fetch emails, labels, threads, and other mailbox information, converting them into a structured format suitable for querying and analysis. This allows for offline access to Gmail data and enables users to perform custom analyses using SQL. The tool supports incremental updates, meaning it can efficiently synchronize the local database with new or changed emails in Gmail without needing to re-download everything. It provides various options for filtering and selecting specific data to download, offering flexibility in controlling the size and scope of the local database.
Hacker News users generally praised gmail-to-sqlite for its simplicity and utility. Several commenters highlighted its usefulness for data analysis and searchability, contrasting it favorably with Gmail's built-in search. Some suggested potential improvements or additions, including support for attachments, label syncing, and incremental updates. One commenter noted potential privacy implications of storing Gmail data locally, while another pointed out the project's similarity to the functionality offered by Google Takeout. The discussion also touched upon alternative tools and methods for achieving similar results, such as imap-backup. Overall, the comments reflect a positive reception to the project, with an emphasis on its practical applications for personal data management.
NNCPNET is a new peer-to-peer, offline-first email network designed for resilience and privacy. Leveraging end-to-end encryption and store-and-forward messaging via sneakernet (physical media like USB drives) or opportunistic network connections, it aims to bypass traditional internet infrastructure. Users generate their own cryptographic keys and can exchange messages directly or through intermediary nodes. While still early in development, NNCPNET offers a potential alternative for communication in situations where internet access is unreliable, censored, or unavailable.
HN commenters generally express interest in NNCPNET, praising its decentralized and resilient design as a potential alternative to centralized email providers. Some raise concerns about usability and setup complexity, questioning the practicality for non-technical users. Several discuss the potential for spam and abuse, with suggestions for moderation or reputation systems. Others highlight the project's reliance on Usenet technology, debating its suitability and expressing hope for future improvements. A few users compare NNCPNET to other decentralized messaging systems, noting its unique features like offline message passing and end-to-end encryption. The project's early stage of development is acknowledged, with comments expressing anticipation for its progress and potential impact on online communication.
The blog post argues against interactive emails, specifically targeting AMP for Email. It contends that email's simplicity and plain text accessibility are its strengths, while interactivity introduces complexity, security risks, and accessibility issues. AMP, despite promising dynamic content, ultimately failed to gain traction because it bloated email size, created rendering inconsistencies across clients, demanded extra development effort, and ultimately provided little benefit over well-designed traditional HTML emails with clear calls to action leading to external web pages. Email's purpose, the author asserts, is to deliver concise information and entice clicks to richer online experiences, not to replicate those experiences within the inbox itself.
HN commenters generally agree that AMP for email was a bad idea. Several pointed out the privacy implications of allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution within emails, potentially exposing sensitive information to third parties. Others criticized the added complexity for both email developers and users, with little demonstrable benefit. Some suggested that AMP's failure stemmed from a misunderstanding of email's core function, which is primarily asynchronous communication, not interactive web pages. The lack of widespread adoption and the subsequent deprecation by Google were seen as validation of these criticisms. A few commenters expressed mild disappointment, suggesting some potential benefits like real-time updates, but ultimately acknowledged the security and usability concerns outweighed the advantages. Several comments also lamented the general trend of "over-engineering" email, moving away from its simple and robust text-based roots.
Notion has launched Notion Mail, an email client integrated directly into its workspace platform. It aims to streamline communication and project management by connecting emails to Notion pages, databases, and workflows. Key features include customizable inboxes with filters and sorting, the ability to convert emails into Notion tasks, and a built-in AI assistant called Notion AI for summarizing threads, composing replies, and translating messages. Notion Mail is currently in beta and available via a waitlist. It's designed to help users manage email within their existing Notion workflow, reducing context switching and improving productivity.
Hacker News users reacted to Notion Mail with skepticism and cautious curiosity. Several commenters questioned the value proposition, especially given the existing robust email clients and Notion's already broad feature set. Some worried about vendor lock-in and the potential for Notion to become bloated. Others expressed interest in specific features like the integrated task management and the potential for improved collaboration within teams already using Notion. A few users pointed out the limited availability (invite-only) and the potential for pricing concerns down the line. There was also discussion comparing Notion Mail to Superhuman and other email clients focusing on productivity and organization. Overall, the sentiment leaned towards a "wait-and-see" approach, with many wanting to observe real-world usage and reviews before considering a switch.
IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) allows multiple clients to access and manage email stored on a server. Instead of downloading messages like POP3, IMAP synchronizes the client's view with the server's mailbox state. Clients issue commands to interact with messages on the server – reading, deleting, moving, etc. – and the server responds with status updates and data. This enables access to the same mailbox from various devices while maintaining consistency. IMAP uses a folder structure on the server, mirroring this on the client, and supports flags for marking messages as read, answered, deleted, etc., all managed server-side. Connections are typically kept open for continuous synchronization and responsiveness.
Hacker News users discussed various aspects of IMAP, focusing on its complexity and alternatives. Some praised the article for clearly explaining a convoluted protocol, while others shared personal experiences and frustrations with IMAP's quirks, such as inconsistent behavior across servers. A few commenters suggested exploring simpler email protocols like POP3 for basic use cases or diving deeper into specific IMAP features. The discussion also touched on email clients, synchronization challenges, and the benefits of storing emails locally. Several users recommended Dovecot as a robust IMAP server implementation.
Delta Chat is a free and open-source messaging app that leverages existing email infrastructure for communication. Instead of relying on centralized servers, messages are sent and received as encrypted emails, ensuring end-to-end encryption through automatic PGP key management. This means users can communicate securely using their existing email addresses and providers, without needing to create new accounts or convince contacts to join a specific platform. Delta Chat offers a familiar chat interface with features like group chats, file sharing, and voice messages, all while maintaining the decentralized and private nature of email communication. Essentially, it transforms email into a modern messaging experience without compromising user control or security.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed interest in Delta Chat's approach to secure messaging by leveraging existing email infrastructure. Some praised its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for non-technical users, highlighting the lack of needing to manage separate accounts or convince contacts to join a new platform. Several users discussed potential downsides, including metadata leakage inherent in the email protocol and the potential for spam. The reliance on Autocrypt for key exchange was also a point of discussion, with some expressing concerns about its discoverability and broader adoption. A few commenters mentioned alternative projects with similar aims, like Briar and Status. Overall, the sentiment leaned towards cautious optimism, acknowledging Delta Chat's unique advantages while recognizing the challenges of building a secure messaging system on top of email.
The Hacker News post showcases an AI-powered voice agent designed to manage Gmail. This agent, accessed through a dedicated web interface, allows users to interact with their inbox conversationally, using voice commands to perform actions like reading emails, composing replies, archiving, and searching. The goal is to provide a hands-free, more efficient way to handle email, particularly beneficial for multitasking or accessibility.
Hacker News users generally expressed skepticism and concerns about privacy regarding the AI voice agent for Gmail. Several commenters questioned the value proposition, wondering why voice control would be preferable to existing keyboard shortcuts and features within Gmail. The potential for errors and the need for precise language when dealing with email were also highlighted as drawbacks. Some users expressed discomfort with granting access to their email data, and the closed-source nature of the project further amplified these privacy worries. The lack of a clear explanation of the underlying AI technology also drew criticism. There was some interest in the technical implementation, but overall, the reception was cautious, with many commenters viewing the project as potentially more trouble than it's worth.
Imapsync is a command-line tool designed for synchronizing or migrating email accounts between IMAP servers. It supports a wide range of scenarios, including one-way and two-way synchronization, transferring emails between different providers, migrating to a new server, and creating backups. Imapsync offers features like folder filtering, bandwidth control, SSL/TLS encryption, and the ability to resume interrupted transfers. It prioritizes data safety and accuracy, employing techniques like dry runs to preview changes and MD5 checksum comparisons to verify message integrity. While primarily aimed at advanced users comfortable with command-line interfaces, its documentation provides detailed instructions and examples.
Hacker News users discuss imapsync's utility for migrating email, highlighting its speed and effectiveness, particularly with large mailboxes. Some users praise its ability to handle complex migrations across different providers, while others caution about potential issues like duplicate emails if not used carefully. Several commenters suggest alternative tools like OfflineIMAP, isync, and mbsync, comparing their features and ease of use to imapsync. A few users also share their experiences using imapsync for specific migration scenarios, offering practical tips and workarounds for common challenges.
Tired of missing important emails hidden by overly complex filters, Cory Doctorow deactivated all his email filtering. He now processes everything manually, relying on search and a "processed" tag for organization. This shift, though initially time-consuming, allows him to maintain better awareness of his inbox contents and engage more thoughtfully with his correspondence, ultimately reducing stress and improving his overall email experience. He believes filters fostered a false sense of control and led to overlooked messages.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that email filters create more work than they save. Several share their own experiences of abandoning filtering, citing increased focus and reduced email anxiety. Some suggest alternative strategies like using multiple inboxes or prioritizing newsletters to specific days. A few dissenting voices argue that filters are useful for specific situations, like separating work and personal email or managing high volumes of mailing list traffic. One commenter notes the irony of using a "Focus Inbox" feature, essentially a built-in filter, while advocating against custom filters. Others point out that the efficacy of filtering depends heavily on individual email volume and work style.
Elwood Edwards, the voice of the iconic "You've got mail!" AOL notification, is offering personalized voice recordings through Cameo. He records greetings, announcements, and other custom messages, providing a nostalgic touch for fans of the classic internet sound. This allows individuals and businesses to incorporate the familiar and beloved voice into various projects or simply have a personalized message from a piece of internet history.
HN commenters were generally impressed with the technical achievement of Elwood's personalized voice recordings using Edwards' voice. Several pointed out the potential for misuse, particularly in scams and phishing attempts, with some suggesting watermarking or other methods to verify authenticity. The legal and ethical implications of using someone's voice, even with their permission, were also raised, especially regarding future deepfakes and potential damage to reputation. Others discussed the nostalgia factor and potential applications like personalized audiobooks or interactive fiction. There was a small thread about the technical details of the voice cloning process and its limitations, and a few comments recalling Edwards' previous work. Some commenters were more skeptical, viewing it as a clever but ultimately limited gimmick.
Summary of Comments ( 13 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44020914
HN users largely discuss their preferred methods for handling patches, with several alternatives to Mail.app presented.
mutt,imapfilter, and a combination of offlineimap andgit amare popular choices, cited for their efficiency and command-line convenience. Some users question the premise of using Mail.app at all, highlighting its clunkiness for patch management. A few commenters appreciate the author's perspective and workflow, finding it resonates with their own, though acknowledging the limitations of Mail.app for this purpose. The discussion also briefly touches on security concerns and the necessity of verifying patch sources.The Hacker News post "Working with Git Patches in Apple Mail (2023)" linking to btxx.org/posts/mail/ has several comments discussing the author's workflow for applying git patches within Apple Mail.
Many commenters express appreciation for the tip, finding it novel and potentially useful. Some highlight the simplicity and elegance of leveraging Mail's built-in rendering capabilities for diffs and the straightforward drag-and-drop application to the terminal.
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around alternative methods and existing tools for patch management. Commenters mention dedicated GUI tools for Git, arguing that these often provide a more robust and feature-rich experience for handling patches, especially for complex scenarios. Specifically, tools like GitKraken, Fork, Sublime Merge, and the GitHub CLI are mentioned as preferred alternatives.
Some users point out potential downsides to the Mail-based approach, such as the risk of accidentally applying incorrect patches or the lack of more advanced features offered by dedicated Git clients. They also mention the potential for email formatting to interfere with the patch application process.
The discussion also touches on the broader context of email clients and their surprising utility for tasks beyond typical communication. One commenter shares an anecdote about using Eudora for code review in the past, highlighting a history of unconventional uses for email clients in software development.
Another thread within the comments explores alternative text editors and their integration with Git. Sublime Text, VS Code, and Vim are mentioned, along with their respective plugins and functionalities for simplifying patch management.
Finally, some comments offer further tips and refinements to the author's workflow. Suggestions include piping the patch directly to
patch -p1for a more streamlined process and usingpbcopyandpbpasteon macOS for clipboard management.