Stories with Tag macOS

• Show HN: A new native app for 20 year old OS X

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-24 00:46:55

  Verbose tl;dr

  Chad Bibler has created Uppercut, a new native application specifically designed for older PowerPC Macs running Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) and 10.5 (Leopard). Focusing on modern web browsing, Uppercut uses WebKit2 to provide a more secure and up-to-date browsing experience on these legacy systems. While acknowledging the limitations of the aging hardware, the app aims to offer a viable way to access current websites on these vintage machines.

  Chad Bibler has unveiled a newly developed native application specifically designed for the venerable Mac OS X operating system, an impressive feat considering its age of two decades. This application, christened "Uppercut," aims to address a specific, yet persistent, irritation for users of older Mac OS X versions: the inability to easily force quit frozen or unresponsive applications. While newer macOS iterations offer a refined and readily accessible "Force Quit" dialogue, earlier versions of OS X lacked this convenient functionality, often necessitating a full system restart, a disruptive solution to a relatively minor problem.

  Uppercut offers a streamlined and efficient solution to this historical shortcoming. It presents a compact, unobtrusive window that displays a list of all currently running applications. Users can then select the offending, non-responsive application from this list and, with a simple click of a button or a keyboard shortcut, forcibly terminate the selected process. This allows users to regain control of their system without resorting to the more drastic measure of a full reboot, preserving their work and avoiding unnecessary downtime.

  The application's native design ensures seamless integration with the classic Mac OS X aesthetic. It leverages the familiar interface elements and design principles of the era, creating a cohesive and user-friendly experience. Furthermore, the developer has made Uppercut available as a free and open-source project, encouraging community involvement and allowing users to examine, modify, and contribute to the application's continued development. This commitment to open-source principles aligns with the spirit of early Mac OS X development and fosters a collaborative environment for preserving and enhancing the usability of this legacy operating system. In essence, Uppercut provides a modern solution to a long-standing problem for users clinging to, or appreciating, the classic charm of Mac OS X.

  • macOS
  • OS X
  • Native App
  • Retrocomputing
  • vintage computing
  • Application Development
  • Software
  • GUI
  • User Interface
  • App Development

  Summary of Comments ( 3 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809518

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters generally praised the Uppercut app for its clean design and focus on essential features, seeing it as a refreshing alternative to overly complex modern software. Some questioned the long-term viability of supporting such an old OS, while others reminisced about the simplicity of older macOS versions. Several users suggested potential improvements, including adding syntax highlighting for more languages and incorporating Git integration. The developer responded to several comments, clarifying design choices and acknowledging feature requests. A few commenters expressed concerns about the app's name potentially confusing it with the existing Uppercut vector graphics editor.

  The Hacker News post "Show HN: A new native app for 20 year old OS X" generated several comments discussing the showcased app, Uppercut, a menu bar application for macOS.

  Many commenters expressed appreciation for the app's clean and simple design, particularly praising its adherence to classic macOS UI principles. They found it refreshing to see a new app that respects the older aesthetic and avoids the trend towards overly complex or "modernized" interfaces. Several users specifically mentioned enjoying the use of native UI elements and the avoidance of Electron or other cross-platform frameworks.

  The developer's decision to target older macOS versions was also a point of discussion. While some questioned the practicality of supporting such outdated systems, others praised the commitment to maintaining compatibility for users who might be running older hardware or prefer the classic OS experience. This sparked a broader conversation about software longevity, the challenges of supporting legacy systems, and the value of maintaining backwards compatibility.

  Some commenters inquired about specific features and functionalities, such as keyboard shortcuts, customization options, and potential future additions. The developer actively engaged with these comments, responding to questions and providing insights into the app's design choices and development roadmap.

  A few users offered constructive criticism, suggesting improvements like better integration with existing menu bar utilities and more robust error handling. These suggestions were generally well-received by the developer and other commenters.

  There was also some discussion around the choice of programming language (Swift) and the developer's experience building the app. The developer's willingness to share their process and engage with the community was appreciated by many.

  Overall, the comments were largely positive, reflecting a general appreciation for the app's design, functionality, and the developer's commitment to the macOS platform. The discussion also touched upon broader themes of software development, UI/UX design, and the challenges of supporting legacy systems.

• Susctl CVE-2024-54507: A particularly 'sus' sysctl in the XNU kernel

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-23 22:37:57

  Verbose tl;dr

  A vulnerability (CVE-2024-54507) was discovered in the XNU kernel, affecting macOS and iOS, which allows malicious actors to leak kernel memory. The flaw resides in the sysctl interface, specifically the kern.hv_vmm_vcpu_state handler. This handler failed to properly validate the size of the buffer provided by the user, resulting in an out-of-bounds read. By crafting a request with a larger buffer than expected, an attacker could read data beyond the intended memory region, potentially exposing sensitive kernel information. This vulnerability was patched by Apple in October 2024 and is relatively simple to exploit.

  The blog post by Jann Horn, titled "Susctl CVE-2024-54507: A particularly 'sus' sysctl in the XNU kernel," details a vulnerability (CVE-2024-54507) discovered in Apple's XNU kernel, impacting macOS and iOS. This vulnerability stems from improper handling of the kern.sysctlbyname sysctl, specifically when dealing with nested structures within sysctl MIBs (Management Information Bases).

  Horn explains that kern.sysctlbyname allows userspace programs to access kernel data structures by specifying a name-based path, akin to navigating a file system. The issue arises when a MIB entry points to a structure containing further nested structures or pointers. Normally, sysctlbyname should only allow access to the top-level structure specified in the MIB. However, the flawed implementation permitted traversing deeper into these nested structures by simply appending the names of the inner members to the sysctl name, even if those inner members weren't explicitly exposed by any MIB entry.

  This effectively bypassed intended access restrictions, granting access to kernel memory regions that should have been inaccessible to userspace. The specific example provided in the post demonstrates reading the version field of an embedded os_unfair_lock structure within another structure exposed via a sysctl. Although this example only disclosed kernel version information, Horn highlights that this vulnerability could potentially be exploited to leak more sensitive data or even achieve arbitrary memory read, depending on the structures accessible through vulnerable sysctl entries.

  The post delves into the technical details of the vulnerability, explaining how the kernel's internal sysctl_name function mishandled the traversal of these nested structures. It misinterprets the presence of a sub-structure within a returned buffer as an indicator that further traversal is permissible, even if no MIB entry exists for the sub-structure. This logic flaw allows an attacker to construct arbitrary paths by appending the names of nested members, essentially crafting a "fake" MIB entry on the fly.

  Horn's analysis includes a detailed breakdown of the vulnerable code path within the kernel, illustrating the faulty logic. He further illustrates the exploitation process by showcasing a proof-of-concept code snippet that successfully reads the version field of the nested os_unfair_lock structure. The post concludes by mentioning that Apple has addressed this vulnerability in their security updates and encourages users to update their systems. The fix likely involves restricting traversal beyond the top-level structure specified in the MIB, preventing access to nested members not explicitly exposed.

  • CVE-2024-54507
  • XNU
  • Kernel
  • macOS
  • iOS
  • Vulnerability
  • Security
  • Exploit
  • Sysctl
  • Privilege Escalation
  • Kernel Exploit
  • Mac Security
  • iOS Security

  Summary of Comments ( 8 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42808801

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters discuss the CVE-2024-54507 vulnerability, focusing on the unusual nature of the vulnerable sysctl and the potential implications. Several express surprise at the existence of a sysctl that directly modifies kernel memory, questioning why such a mechanism exists and speculating about its intended purpose. Some highlight the severity of the vulnerability, emphasizing the ease of exploitation and the potential for privilege escalation. Others note the fortunate aspect of the bug manifesting as a kernel panic rather than silent memory corruption, making detection easier. The limited practical impact due to System Integrity Protection (SIP) is also mentioned, alongside the difficulty of exploiting the vulnerability remotely. A few commenters also delve into the technical details of the exploit, discussing the specific memory manipulation involved and the resulting kernel crash. The overall sentiment reflects concern about the unusual nature of the vulnerability and its potential implications, even with the mitigating factors.

  The Hacker News post discussing the CVE-2024-54507 vulnerability in the XNU kernel, titled "Susctl CVE-2024-54507: A particularly 'sus' sysctl in the XNU kernel," has generated several comments.

  Many commenters focus on the unusual nature of the vulnerability and its exploitation. One commenter points out the irony of a vulnerability existing in a mechanism designed to improve security, specifically the sysctl interface intended for secure configuration adjustments. They express surprise that such a fundamental component could be susceptible to this type of issue.

  Another commenter delves into the technical details of the exploit, highlighting the unexpected behavior of the sysctl handler. They discuss how the vulnerability arises from an incorrect handling of specific input, leading to a kernel panic. The comment emphasizes the severity of the issue, as it can be triggered remotely, potentially allowing for denial-of-service attacks.

  Several commenters also discuss the implications of the vulnerability for Apple users. Some express concern about the potential impact on macOS and iOS devices, given the widespread use of the XNU kernel. Others raise questions about the timeline for a patch and the potential for exploitation in the wild.

  A few comments touch on the broader security implications of this type of vulnerability. One commenter notes the increasing complexity of modern operating systems and the challenges of ensuring their security. They suggest that this vulnerability highlights the need for more robust security testing and validation processes.

  Some of the more technically inclined comments delve into the specifics of the kernel code and the mechanisms that led to the vulnerability. These comments offer insights into the inner workings of the XNU kernel and provide a deeper understanding of the exploit's technical details.

  A couple of commenters also discuss the responsible disclosure process and commend the researchers for reporting the vulnerability to Apple before publicly disclosing it. They emphasize the importance of responsible disclosure in mitigating the potential impact of security vulnerabilities.

  Overall, the comments on the Hacker News post reflect a mixture of surprise, concern, and technical analysis. The commenters acknowledge the severity of the vulnerability and its potential impact on Apple users, while also delving into the technical intricacies of the exploit and its implications for kernel security.

• Mixxx: GPL DJ Software

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-20 15:53:31

  Verbose tl;dr

  Mixxx is free, open-source DJ software available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It offers a comprehensive feature set comparable to professional DJ applications, including support for a wide range of DJ controllers, four decks, timecode vinyl control, recording and broadcasting capabilities, effects, looping, cue points, and advanced mixing features like key detection and quantizing. Mixxx aims to empower DJs of all skill levels with professional-grade tools without the cost barrier, fostering a community around open-source DJing.

  Mixxx is a free and open-source digital DJing application, licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), enabling users to mix music on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools designed to emulate and expand upon the functionalities of professional DJ hardware. The software boasts support for a wide range of DJ controllers, allowing users to seamlessly integrate their physical hardware with the digital interface. This integration facilitates tactile control over mixing features, offering a hands-on experience similar to traditional DJ setups. For users without dedicated hardware, Mixxx also functions effectively with standard keyboard and mouse input.

  Key features highlighted include BPM (beats per minute) detection and synchronization, enabling users to match the tempo of different tracks for smooth transitions. The software offers key detection and key lock functionality, preserving the musical key of a track even when its tempo is adjusted, preventing disharmony during mixing. Four decks are available for simultaneous manipulation of multiple tracks, offering advanced mixing possibilities. Users can employ effects such as EQ, reverb, and flanger to sculpt and enhance the sound of their mixes. Integrated recording capabilities allow users to capture their performances for later sharing or analysis. Looping functions provide further creative control, allowing for the repetition of specific sections within a track. Mixxx also supports a variety of audio formats, ensuring compatibility with a broad range of music libraries.

  Furthermore, Mixxx emphasizes its accessibility and customizability. The open-source nature of the project allows users to contribute to its development and tailor the software to their specific needs. The user interface is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, catering to both novice and experienced DJs. The software also incorporates broadcasting features, enabling users to stream their mixes live to online platforms. Support for various MIDI controllers reinforces the software's flexibility and adaptability to different hardware setups. The website explicitly states that Mixxx is free of charge and contains no advertising or bundled software, highlighting its commitment to remaining a purely community-driven and accessible platform for aspiring and professional DJs alike.

  • DJ
  • Software
  • Open Source
  • GPL
  • Music
  • Mixing
  • Digital DJ
  • Audio
  • Free Software
  • Mixxx
  • Linux
  • Windows
  • macOS
  • MIDI
  • Beatmatching

  Summary of Comments ( 14 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42769871

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters discuss Mixxx's maturity and feature richness, favorably comparing it to proprietary DJ software. Several users praise its stability and professional-grade functionality, highlighting features like key detection, BPM analysis, and effects. Some mention using it successfully for live performances and even prefer it over Traktor and Serato. The open-source nature of the software is also appreciated, with some expressing excitement about contributing or customizing it. A few commenters bring up past experiences with Mixxx, noting improvements over time and expressing renewed interest in trying the latest version. The potential for Linux adoption in the DJ space is also touched upon.

  The Hacker News post titled "Mixxx: GPL DJ Software" linking to mixxx.org has a number of comments discussing the software, its features, and alternatives.

  Several commenters praise Mixxx as a robust and capable DJing application, particularly highlighting its free and open-source nature. One user mentions using it regularly for vinyl ripping and praises its key detection and BPM analysis capabilities, finding them comparable to commercial software. They also appreciate its support for various hardware controllers. Another commenter echoes this sentiment, stating that it's a "very solid piece of software" and emphasizing its cross-platform compatibility. This commenter further points out its accessibility for those new to DJing, while still offering depth for experienced users.

  The discussion also touches upon the broader landscape of DJ software. VirtualDJ is mentioned as a popular alternative, though some users express concerns about its proprietary nature and subscription model. Serato is also brought up as a competitor favored by some professional DJs. One commenter specifically contrasts Mixxx with Serato, mentioning Serato's tighter integration with specific hardware and a more polished interface, but ultimately reiterating their preference for Mixxx's open-source philosophy.

  Some users delve into more technical details, discussing Mixxx's performance and resource usage. One user inquires about its ability to handle large music libraries efficiently, which sparks a conversation about database optimization and the potential impact on performance with extensive collections. Another user questions the stability of the software, particularly with regards to controller support.

  Other comments focus on the project's development and community. A commenter asks about the development status and future plans, expressing interest in the project's direction. Another mentions contributing to the project in the past and praises the community's responsiveness. The licensing model (GPL) is also briefly discussed, with one user emphasizing the importance of open-source software in the creative arts.

  Overall, the comments paint a picture of Mixxx as a respected and functional open-source DJ application, appreciated by many for its capabilities, flexibility, and community-driven development. While acknowledging the existence of commercial alternatives, many commenters champion Mixxx as a viable and often preferred option, especially for those prioritizing open-source software and cost-effectiveness.

• Mac Mini G4 – The best « classic » Macintosh for retro-gaming?

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-12 15:53:02

  Verbose tl;dr

  The Mac Mini G4 strikes a sweet spot for classic Mac gaming, balancing performance, affordability, and size. Its PowerPC G4 processor handles early 2000s Mac OS X games well, including some Classic environment titles. While not as powerful as the Power Mac G5, its smaller footprint and lower cost make it more practical. The option for an internal optical drive is beneficial for playing original game discs, and it supports various controllers. Though not perfect due to limitations with certain later-era games and the eventual demise of Rosetta, the Mini G4 remains an excellent entry point for exploring the older Macintosh gaming library.

  Xavier Toffoli's blog post, "Mac Mini G4 – The best « classic » Macintosh for retro-gaming?", explores the merits of the PowerPC G4-based Mac Mini as a platform for playing older video games, particularly those designed for classic Mac OS and early Intel-based Macs. Toffoli frames his argument by acknowledging the existing popularity of older Macintosh models for retro gaming, such as the iMac G3 and Power Macintosh G3/G4, but posits that the Mac Mini G4 offers a compelling combination of factors that distinguish it as a potentially superior choice.

  He highlights the Mac Mini G4's relatively compact size, making it easily transportable and less demanding of desk space compared to its bulkier predecessors. This portability, combined with its relatively low power consumption, contributes to its practicality as a retro gaming machine. Toffoli emphasizes the machine's quiet operation, a significant advantage over the often noisy fans found in older Macs, allowing for a more immersive and less distracting gaming experience.

  The author delves into the technical specifications of the Mac Mini G4, explaining how its PowerPC G4 processor, coupled with the capabilities of Mac OS 9 and early versions of Mac OS X, allows for compatibility with a wide range of classic Macintosh games. He notes the system's ability to run both Classic environment software (older Mac OS applications) within OS X and natively boot into OS 9, offering flexibility for different gaming needs. Furthermore, he points out that the Mac Mini G4 can also run early Intel-based Mac games through Rosetta, Apple's software layer for PowerPC emulation on Intel Macs, expanding the potential library of playable titles. This bridging of the PowerPC and Intel eras contributes to the machine's versatility.

  Toffoli acknowledges some limitations, such as the Mac Mini G4's integrated graphics, which may struggle with more demanding 3D games designed for later Mac models. He also discusses the potential need for upgrades, such as increasing RAM or installing a larger hard drive, to optimize performance and storage capacity for a larger game library. Despite these limitations, he concludes that the Mac Mini G4, with its balance of performance, compact design, quiet operation, and software compatibility, represents a compelling and arguably optimal choice for enthusiasts seeking a dedicated machine for experiencing the rich history of Macintosh gaming. He underscores the machine's ability to offer a satisfying retro gaming experience across a spectrum of titles, from older Mac OS classics to early Intel-era releases.

  • Mac Mini G4
  • Retro Gaming
  • Classic Mac
  • Macintosh
  • Gaming
  • vintage computing
  • Emulation
  • Mac OS 9
  • Mac OS X
  • PowerPC
  • Retro Macintosh Gaming
  • Classic Macintosh Gaming
  • PowerPC G4
  • macOS
  • Retro Computing

  Summary of Comments ( 111 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42674385

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users generally agree with the article's premise that the Mac Mini G4 is a good choice for classic Mac gaming. Several commenters praise its relatively compact size, affordability, and ability to run OS 9 and early OS X, covering a wide range of game titles. Some highlight the ease of upgrading the RAM and hard drive. However, some dissent arises regarding its gaming capabilities compared to earlier PowerPC Macs like the G3 or G4 towers, suggesting they offer superior performance for certain games. Others point to the lack of AGP graphics as a limitation for some titles. The discussion also touches on alternative emulation methods using SheepShaver or Basilisk II, though many prefer the native experience offered by the Mini. Several commenters also share personal anecdotes about their experiences with the Mac Mini G4 and other retro Macs.

  The Hacker News post "Mac Mini G4 – The best « classic » Macintosh for retrogaming?" sparked a modest discussion with a few interesting points raised.

  One commenter highlights the Mac Mini G4's advantages for retro gaming, specifically its compact size, relatively powerful PowerPC G4 processor, ability to boot into both Mac OS 9 and early versions of OS X, and support for classic Mac games that often struggle on later Intel-based Macs. They also mention the ease of upgrading the RAM and hard drive. This commenter positions the Mini as a good compromise, lacking the expandability of a full tower G4 but offering a more practical and space-saving solution.

  Another commenter agrees with the original post's sentiment, emphasizing the Mac Mini G4's balance of performance and affordability, calling it the "sweet spot" for classic Mac gaming. They further note the benefit of its official support for Tiger, which allows for running emulators for other retro systems.

  A different commenter expresses nostalgia for this era of Apple hardware, recounting their positive experience using a PowerBook G4. While not directly related to gaming, this comment adds to the overall sentiment of appreciation for the G4 era.

  Another contributor points out the potential challenge of finding suitable displays for older Macs, as many modern monitors lack the necessary connections. They suggest exploring solutions like DVI to HDMI converters or specifically seeking out older displays with DVI or VGA inputs. This practical consideration provides valuable context for anyone looking to set up a retro gaming system with a Mac Mini G4.

  Finally, a commenter mentions the iBook G4 as another viable, and often cheaper, alternative for retro gaming, although acknowledging its lower performance compared to the Mini.

  While the discussion thread is not extensive, it offers valuable insights into the advantages and considerations of using a Mac Mini G4 for retro gaming, touching on aspects like performance, practicality, compatibility, and alternative options.