Good engineering principles, like prioritizing simplicity, focusing on the user, and embracing iteration, apply equally to individuals and organizations. An engineer's effectiveness hinges on clear communication, understanding context, and building trust, just as an organization's success depends on efficient processes, shared understanding, and psychological safety. Essentially, the qualities that make a good engineer—curiosity, pragmatism, and a bias towards action—should be reflected in the organizational culture and processes to foster a productive and fulfilling engineering environment. By prioritizing these principles, both engineers and organizations can create better products and more satisfying experiences.
Intrinsic motivation, the drive to engage in activities for inherent satisfaction rather than external rewards, can be cultivated by focusing on three key psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Autonomy is supported by offering choices, minimizing pressure, and acknowledging feelings. Competence grows through providing optimal challenges, positive feedback focused on effort and strategy, and opportunities for skill development. Relatedness is fostered by creating a sense of belonging, shared goals, and genuine connection with others. By intentionally designing environments and interactions that nurture these needs, we can enhance intrinsic motivation, leading to greater persistence, creativity, and overall well-being.
HN users generally agree with the article's premise that intrinsic motivation is crucial and difficult to cultivate. Several commenters highlight the importance of autonomy, mastery, and purpose, echoing the article's points but adding personal anecdotes and practical examples. Some discuss the detrimental effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation, particularly in creative fields. One compelling comment thread explores the idea of "flow state" and how creating environments conducive to flow can foster intrinsic motivation. Another commenter questions the applicability of research on intrinsic motivation to the modern workplace, suggesting that precarious employment situations often prioritize survival over self-actualization. Overall, the comments affirm the value of intrinsic motivation while acknowledging the complexities of fostering it in various contexts.
The author reflects on their educational journey, contrasting their deep passion for physics with their initial disinterest in biology. They recount how a shift in perspective, focusing on the intricate mechanisms and "physics-like" processes within biological systems, sparked a newfound appreciation for the subject. This realization came through exploring topics like protein folding and the Krebs cycle, revealing the elegant underlying order and logic of life. The author ultimately laments not embracing biology earlier, recognizing its interconnectedness with physics and the profound beauty of its complexity.
HN users largely agree with the author's sentiment that biology education often focuses too much on rote memorization, hindering genuine interest and exploration. Several commenters shared similar experiences, finding biology classes tedious and uninspiring due to the emphasis on memorizing facts rather than understanding underlying principles. Some suggested that introducing programming and computational approaches earlier could make the subject more engaging and accessible. Others pointed out the crucial role of passionate teachers in sparking curiosity and fostering a deeper appreciation for biology, contrasting their positive experiences with the author's. A few commenters challenged the premise, arguing that memorization is a necessary foundation in biology and that appreciation can develop later with further study and specialization. The discussion also touched upon the limitations of standardized testing and the need for more project-based learning in biology education.
The blog post "Don't force your kids to do math" argues against rote memorization and forced practice. Instead, it advocates for fostering genuine mathematical curiosity by connecting math to real-world applications and children's interests. The author suggests incorporating mathematical thinking into everyday activities like cooking, building, and playing games. By presenting math as a tool for exploration and problem-solving, rather than a chore, children are more likely to develop a genuine appreciation and understanding of the subject. This approach encourages intrinsic motivation, leading to more effective and enjoyable learning.
Hacker News users largely agreed with the article's premise of not forcing kids to do math, emphasizing the importance of fostering genuine interest instead of rote memorization. Several commenters shared anecdotes of negative experiences with forced math education, leading to anxiety and resentment towards the subject. Some suggested alternative approaches, like incorporating mathematical concepts into engaging activities and games, or waiting until the child displays natural curiosity. A few dissenting voices argued for the necessity of a basic level of math proficiency, but even they stressed the importance of finding enjoyable methods of learning. Overall, the discussion favored a more relaxed and interest-driven approach to math education, prioritizing long-term engagement over short-term performance.
An ADHD body double is a person who provides a supportive, non-judgmental presence for someone with ADHD while they work on tasks. Their mere presence can help improve focus, motivation, and accountability, making it easier to start and complete tasks that might otherwise feel overwhelming. The body double doesn't actively participate in the task itself but acts as a silent, grounding influence, minimizing distractions and helping maintain focus. This technique can be helpful for various activities, from chores and work projects to creative endeavors, offering a simple yet effective strategy to manage ADHD-related challenges.
HN commenters generally agree that body doubling is a helpful technique, not just for those with ADHD. Many share their own experiences with informal body doubling, such as working in coffee shops or libraries, or using online tools like Focusmate. Some highlight the accountability and reduced procrastination it provides, while others emphasize the social aspect and feeling of shared purpose. A few express skepticism, questioning whether it's a genuine solution or just a temporary crutch, and suggest addressing underlying issues instead. There's also discussion about the importance of finding the right body double, as personality and work style compatibility can significantly impact effectiveness. Finally, several commenters offer alternative strategies for focus and productivity, like the Pomodoro Technique and binaural beats.
Side projects offer a unique kind of satisfaction distinct from professional work. They provide a creative outlet free from client demands or performance pressures, allowing for pure exploration and experimentation. This freedom fosters a "flow state" of deep focus and enjoyment, leading to a sense of accomplishment and rejuvenation. Side projects also offer the opportunity to learn new skills, build tangible products, and rediscover the inherent joy of creation, ultimately making us better, more well-rounded individuals, both personally and professionally.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's sentiment about the joys of side projects. Several shared their own experiences with fulfilling side projects, emphasizing the importance of intrinsic motivation and the freedom to explore without pressure. Some pointed out the benefits of side projects for skill development and career advancement, while others cautioned against overworking and the potential for side projects to become stressful if not managed properly. One commenter suggested that the "zen" feeling comes from the creator's full ownership and control, a stark contrast to the often restrictive nature of client work. Another popular comment highlighted the importance of setting realistic goals and enjoying the process itself rather than focusing solely on the outcome. A few users questioned the accessibility of side projects for those with limited free time due to family or other commitments.
Paul Graham advises aspiring startup founders to relentlessly pursue their own curiosity. He argues that the most successful startups are built by founders deeply passionate about solving a problem they personally experience. Instead of chasing trends or abstract notions of good ideas, Graham encourages builders to work on what truly interests them, even if it seems niche or insignificant. This genuine interest will fuel the sustained effort required to overcome the inevitable challenges of building a company. By focusing on their own curiosity and building something they themselves want, founders are more likely to create something truly valuable and novel.
HN users largely agree with Paul Graham's advice to focus on what truly compels you and to avoid prestigious but ultimately unsatisfying paths. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of choosing passion projects over seemingly "better" opportunities, ultimately leading to greater fulfillment. Some highlighted the difficulty in identifying what truly interests you, suggesting exploration and experimentation as key. A few cautioned against blindly following passion without considering practicalities like financial stability, advocating for a balance between pursuing interests and ensuring a sustainable livelihood. The idea of "keeping your horizons narrow" to focus deeply resonated with many, although some interpreted this as focusing on a specific problem within a broader field rather than limiting oneself entirely. Finally, some users discussed the role of luck and privilege in being able to pursue unconventional paths.
Tynan's 2023 work prioritization strategy centers around balancing enjoyment, impact, and urgency. He emphasizes choosing tasks he genuinely wants to do, ensuring alignment with his overall goals, and incorporating a small amount of urgent but less enjoyable work to maintain momentum. This system involves maintaining a ranked list of potential projects, regularly re-evaluating priorities, and focusing on a limited number of key areas, currently including fitness, finance, relationships, and creative pursuits. He acknowledges the influence of external factors but stresses the importance of internal drive and proactively shaping his own work.
HN users generally agreed with the author's approach of focusing on projects driven by intrinsic motivation. Some highlighted the importance of recognizing the difference between genuinely exciting work and mere procrastination disguised as "exploration." Others offered additional factors to consider, like market demand and the potential for learning and growth. A few commenters debated the practicality of this advice for those with less financial freedom, while others shared personal anecdotes about how similar strategies have led them to successful and fulfilling projects. Several appreciated the emphasis on choosing projects that feel right and avoiding forced productivity, echoing the author's sentiment of allowing oneself to be drawn to the most compelling work.
Daale.club is a simple web app delivering a daily dose of Pitbull wisdom. It pulls a random lyric from Pitbull's extensive discography and presents it on a clean, minimalist webpage, offering a moment of Mr. Worldwide's unique brand of inspiration each day. The app aims to provide a lighthearted start to the day or a quick motivational boost with a touch of humor.
HN commenters generally found the "Mr. Worldwide Wisdom" app amusing and well-executed. Several praised its simplicity and the surprising effectiveness of randomly pairing Pitbull lyrics with stock photos. Some suggested improvements, like adding a share button or integrating more Pitbull content, such as music videos or interviews. A few users expressed confusion about the purpose or value, questioning whether it was intended as satire. Others debated the actual wisdom or lack thereof in Pitbull's lyrics, with some arguing for his underlying positivity and others finding it superficial. The overall sentiment was lighthearted appreciation for a fun, quirky project.
Body doubling utilizes the presence of another person, either virtually or in-person, to enhance focus and productivity, particularly for tasks that individuals find challenging to initiate or complete independently. This technique leverages accountability and shared work sessions to combat procrastination and maintain motivation, particularly beneficial for those with ADHD, autism, or other conditions impacting executive function. The website, BodyDoubling.com, offers resources and a platform to connect with others for body doubling sessions, highlighting its effectiveness in overcoming procrastination and fostering a sense of shared purpose while working towards individual goals.
Hacker News users discussed the effectiveness of body doubling, with many sharing personal anecdotes of its benefits for focus and productivity, especially for those with ADHD. Some highlighted the accountability and subtle social pressure as key drivers, while others emphasized the reduction of procrastination and feeling less alone in tackling tasks. A few skeptical commenters questioned the long-term viability and potential for dependency, suggesting it might be a crutch rather than a solution. The discussion also touched upon virtual body doubling tools and the importance of finding a compatible partner, along with the potential for it to evolve into co-working. Some users drew parallels to other productivity techniques like the Pomodoro method, and there was a brief debate about the distinction between body doubling and simply working in the same space.
Struggling with depression and a sense of aimlessness after dropping out of college, the author found solace and direction through Math Academy, an intensive summer program. The structured environment, challenging curriculum, and supportive community helped him rediscover his love for learning and build confidence. He credits the program with pulling him out of a dark place, fostering a sense of accomplishment, and ultimately setting him on a new path toward a fulfilling career in programming. The rigorous mathematical focus provided not just knowledge, but crucial problem-solving skills applicable beyond academia, reigniting his passion and giving him a renewed sense of purpose.
Hacker News users generally reacted positively to the original blog post. Several commenters shared similar experiences of feeling lost and directionless, echoing the author's "valley of despair." Some discussed the benefits of structured learning environments like Math Academy, particularly for those who thrive on rigorous intellectual challenges. Others praised the author's vulnerability and honesty. A few commenters questioned the accessibility and cost of such programs, suggesting alternative resources like community college or online courses. Some also debated the focus on "elite" institutions, advocating for broader access to quality education. Finally, a couple of users expressed skepticism about the long-term effectiveness of bootcamps in general, while acknowledging the author's positive experience.
The core message of "Just Write" is to overcome the paralysis of perfectionism and the fear of judgment by simply starting to write. Don't get bogged down in elaborate outlines or editing; instead, prioritize consistent writing practice to develop your skills and discover your voice. The more you write, the easier it becomes, and the better your writing will be. Embrace imperfection, focus on quantity over quality initially, and view writing as a process of iterative refinement. Over time, this consistent effort will lead to significant improvement and unlock your creative potential.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the core message of "Just Write," emphasizing the importance of consistent writing for skill development and idea generation. Several commenters shared their personal experiences with writing streaks and the positive impact it had on their clarity of thought and ability to articulate ideas. Some cautioned against focusing solely on quantity over quality, suggesting a balance is needed. The idea of lowering the bar for publishing, embracing imperfection, and iterating based on feedback was also discussed. One commenter pointed out the parallels between writing and coding, highlighting the iterative nature of both. Another popular sentiment was the importance of finding a niche and writing about topics that genuinely interest the author.
Even if no one reads your blog, it's still valuable. Writing clarifies your thinking, solidifies your understanding of a topic, and acts as a personal record of your intellectual journey. It can serve as a sandbox for experimenting with ideas, a portfolio to showcase skills, and a springboard for future projects. Essentially, blogging is an act of learning and self-improvement, with the potential bonus of connecting with an audience down the line.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that blogging, even without a large audience, has value. Several highlight the benefits of writing as a way to clarify thinking, consolidate knowledge, and improve writing skills. Some suggest that a blog can serve as a personal knowledge base, searchable archive, or a way to track personal growth. A few practical suggestions include focusing on niche topics and promoting the blog through relevant communities. The idea of writing primarily for oneself, with the potential for an audience as a secondary benefit, is a recurring theme. Some commenters share their own experiences of low-traffic blogs providing unexpected value, like attracting job offers or connecting with like-minded individuals. The overall sentiment is that the intrinsic rewards of blogging often outweigh the pressure of building a large readership.
The author describes how they inadvertently trained themselves to equate effort with negative outcomes. Starting with a challenging physics class, they developed a belief that trying hard and still failing was worse than not trying at all. This self-protective mechanism spread to other areas of their life, leading to procrastination and avoidance of difficult tasks. Eventually, they recognized this pattern of self-sabotage and began the process of unlearning it by reframing failure as a necessary step in learning and growth, and focusing on the process rather than solely on outcomes. They began tackling challenging tasks, celebrating small victories, and gradually rebuilding their self-confidence.
HN commenters largely agreed with the author's premise that negative self-talk and a focus on potential failure can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Several shared similar experiences of psyching themselves out or developing learned helplessness. Some suggested techniques to combat this, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), positive self-talk, and focusing on small wins. One commenter pointed out the link between the article's concept and the idea of "locus of control," emphasizing the importance of feeling agency over one's actions. Another questioned the framing of "conditioning," suggesting it implied a more passive process than the conscious, albeit negative, choices described. A few comments also discussed the potential evolutionary basis for negativity bias and its role in risk avoidance.
TabBoo is a browser extension designed to deter procrastination by injecting random jumpscares into websites the user designates as distracting. It works by periodically displaying startling images, chosen from a curated selection or uploaded by the user, on blacklisted sites. This aims to create a negative association with those sites, making them less appealing to visit and thus boosting productivity. The extension offers customization options for jumpscare frequency and image selection, allowing users to tailor the experience to their needs.
Hacker News commenters generally found TabBoo's concept amusing, but impractical for serious self-control. Several pointed out the ease with which one could simply disable the extension or avoid the targeted sites altogether if motivation was truly lacking. Some suggested alternative approaches like website blockers, while others joked about the potential for misuse or the psychological implications of negative reinforcement. A few expressed interest in the technical implementation, particularly the use of AI-generated jumpscares. Overall, the comments lean towards seeing TabBoo as a novelty rather than a robust solution for procrastination.
Ron Garrett reflects on six failed startup attempts, rejecting the label of "failure" and instead focusing on the valuable lessons learned. He emphasizes the importance of choosing the right co-founder, validating ideas early and often, building a minimum viable product (MVP) quickly, and iterating based on user feedback. Marketing and distribution proved crucial, and while passion is essential, it must be coupled with a realistic market and sustainable business model. Ultimately, he learned that "failing fast" and adapting are key to entrepreneurial growth, viewing each setback as a stepping stone toward future success.
HN commenters largely praised the author's vulnerability and honesty in sharing their startup failures. Several highlighted the importance of recognizing sunk cost fallacy and knowing when to pivot or quit. Some questioned the framing of the experiences as "failures," arguing that valuable lessons and growth emerged from them. A few commenters shared their own similar experiences, emphasizing the emotional toll of startup struggles. Others offered practical advice, such as validating ideas early and prioritizing distribution. The prevailing sentiment was one of empathy and encouragement, acknowledging the difficulty of entrepreneurship and the courage it takes to try repeatedly.
James Shore envisions the ideal product engineering organization as a collaborative, learning-focused environment prioritizing customer value. Small, cross-functional teams with full ownership over their products would operate with minimal process, empowered to make independent decisions. A culture of continuous learning and improvement, fueled by frequent experimentation and reflection, would drive innovation. Technical excellence wouldn't be a goal in itself, but a necessary means to rapidly and reliably deliver value. This organization would excel at adaptable planning, embracing change and prioritizing outcomes over rigid roadmaps. Ultimately, it would be a fulfilling and joyful place to work, attracting and retaining top talent.
HN commenters largely agree with James Shore's vision of a strong product engineering organization, emphasizing small, empowered teams, a focus on learning and improvement, and minimal process overhead. Several express skepticism about achieving this ideal in larger organizations due to ingrained hierarchies and the perceived need for control. Some suggest that Shore's model might be better suited for smaller companies or specific teams within larger ones. The most compelling comments highlight the tension between autonomy and standardization, particularly regarding tools and technologies, and the importance of trust and psychological safety for truly effective teamwork. A few commenters also point out the critical role of product vision and leadership in guiding these empowered teams, lest they become fragmented and inefficient.
Summary of Comments ( 98 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44026703
HN commenters largely agreed with Moxie's points about the importance of individual engineers having ownership and agency. Several highlighted the damaging effects of excessive process and rigid hierarchies, echoing Moxie's emphasis on autonomy. Some discussed the challenges of scaling these principles, particularly in larger organizations, with suggestions like breaking down large teams into smaller, more independent units. A few commenters debated the definition of "good engineering," questioning whether focusing solely on speed and impact could lead to neglecting important factors like maintainability and code quality. The importance of clear communication and shared understanding within a team was also a recurring theme. Finally, some commenters pointed out the cyclical nature of these trends, noting that the pendulum often swings between centralized control and decentralized autonomy in engineering organizations.
The Hacker News post discussing Moxie Marlinspike's blog post "A Good Engineer" has generated a substantial amount of discussion, with a diverse range of perspectives on the qualities that define both good engineers and effective engineering organizations.
Several commenters agree with Marlinspike's central premise, highlighting the importance of curiosity, the ability to quickly learn and adapt, and a proactive approach to problem-solving. One commenter elaborates on this, stating that good engineers possess an "innate drive to understand how things work," which translates into a continuous quest for improvement and optimization. Another emphasizes the significance of "systems thinking," arguing that understanding the broader context in which a problem exists is crucial for developing effective solutions. They go further, suggesting that fostering an environment where engineers can explore and experiment, even if it leads to occasional failures, is essential for long-term growth.
The discussion also touches upon the translation of individual qualities to the organizational level. Some commenters believe that organizations mirroring the characteristics of a good engineer—adaptability, a willingness to learn, and a focus on continuous improvement—tend to be more successful. One commenter specifically mentions the importance of "psychological safety," allowing engineers to voice their concerns and propose novel ideas without fear of reprisal. This sentiment is echoed by another who emphasizes the need for open communication and collaboration within the organization.
However, not all comments are in complete agreement with Marlinspike. Some argue that while the qualities he mentions are valuable, they don't encompass the full spectrum of what makes a good engineer. One commenter points out the importance of domain expertise and experience, especially in complex fields, suggesting that a focus solely on adaptability can sometimes overlook the value of specialized knowledge. Another commenter highlights the importance of communication and teamwork, asserting that even the most brilliant individual can be ineffective if they struggle to collaborate with others.
Several comments also delve into the practical aspects of building good engineering organizations. One commenter discusses the challenges of hiring and retaining talent, emphasizing the importance of creating a culture that attracts and nurtures individuals with the desired qualities. Another commenter highlights the role of leadership in fostering a positive and productive engineering environment, suggesting that effective leaders empower their teams and provide them with the resources they need to succeed.
Finally, a few commenters provide anecdotal evidence from their own experiences, sharing stories of both successful and unsuccessful engineering teams and the factors that contributed to their respective outcomes. These personal accounts add a layer of practical insight to the more theoretical aspects of the discussion. Overall, the Hacker News comments provide a rich and multifaceted perspective on the characteristics of good engineers and the organizational structures that support their success.