Microsoft Store no longer functions on Windows 10 version 1809 and Windows Server LTSC 2019. The underlying cause is the retirement of the Package Manager API
and the transition to the Package Manager Client API
, which is unavailable on these older operating systems. Attempts to use the Store result in errors or an empty interface. Users on these legacy systems are effectively locked out of acquiring and updating Store apps.
After October 14, 2025, Microsoft 365 apps like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint will no longer receive security updates or technical support on Windows 10. While the apps will still technically function, using them on an unsupported OS poses security risks. Microsoft encourages users to upgrade to Windows 11 to continue receiving support and maintain the security and functionality of their Microsoft 365 applications.
HN commenters largely discuss the implications of Microsoft ending support for Office apps on Windows 10. Several express frustration with Microsoft's push to upgrade to Windows 11, viewing it as a forced upgrade and an attempt to increase Microsoft 365 subscriptions. Some highlight the inconvenience this poses for users with older hardware incompatible with Windows 11. Others note the potential security risks of using unsupported software and the eventual necessity of upgrading. A few commenters point out the continuing support for Office 2019, although with limited functionality updates, and discuss the alternative of using web-based Office apps or open-source office suites like LibreOffice. Some speculate this is a move to bolster Microsoft 365 subscriptions, making offline productivity increasingly dependent on the service.
Summary of Comments ( 34 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43972360
Hacker News users discuss the implications of Microsoft Store no longer functioning on Windows 10 LTSC 2019 (1809). Several express frustration with Microsoft's push to newer operating systems, viewing it as a tactic to force upgrades and shorten the lifespan of supported versions. Some lament the loss of convenient access to applications like Notepad++, while others point out the continued viability of sideloading or using older Store versions like 11809.1001.12.0 as workarounds. The increasing difficulty of maintaining older Windows versions due to Microsoft's policies is a recurring theme. One user suggests that this move may be related to security concerns and dependencies on newer OS components within the Store application itself.
The Hacker News post "We can no longer run Microsoft Store on 1809/LTSC 2019" has generated several comments discussing the implications of Microsoft's decision to discontinue Store support for older Windows versions.
Several commenters express frustration and disappointment with Microsoft's move. They argue that Long-Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) releases are specifically chosen for their stability and extended support periods, and this change disrupts that expectation. Some feel that Microsoft is deliberately pushing users towards newer operating systems, even when those updates might introduce unwanted features or instability. The sentiment that Microsoft prioritizes its own interests over user needs is a recurring theme.
A few users highlight the impact on specific use cases, such as enterprise environments where upgrading operating systems is a complex and costly process. They explain how this change forces them to either undertake difficult upgrades or lose access to crucial applications distributed through the Microsoft Store.
The technical aspects of the change are also discussed. Some commenters speculate about the underlying reasons for Microsoft's decision, suggesting it might be related to security updates or dependencies on newer system components. Others offer potential workarounds, although they acknowledge these might not be feasible for everyone. One commenter mentions using third-party package managers as an alternative to the Microsoft Store, but this solution has limitations.
There's a discussion about the overall direction of Microsoft's software strategy. Some commenters express concern about the increasing prevalence of subscription-based services and the perceived decline in user control over their software. This ties into the larger conversation about "software as a service" and its potential drawbacks.
Finally, there's a thread about the challenges of maintaining legacy systems. Users discuss the trade-offs between stability and access to newer features, and the difficulties of supporting older hardware and software in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
In summary, the comments reflect a general sentiment of frustration with Microsoft's decision. Users express concerns about the disruption to LTSC releases, the implications for enterprise environments, and the broader trends in software development. While some technical solutions are proposed, the overarching theme is the challenge of balancing stability and innovation in a constantly changing technological world.