Glad & Co's "Paper Apps" are physical, paper-based versions of common digital applications like calendars, to-do lists, and project trackers. Designed with a focus on tactile engagement and visual simplicity, these products aim to offer a screen-free alternative for organizing and managing daily tasks. They utilize reusable components like magnets, cards, and dry-erase surfaces, allowing for dynamic updates and customization. The collection includes various formats, from wall-mounted boards to notebooks, catering to different planning needs and preferences. Ultimately, Paper Apps seek to combine the flexibility of digital tools with the tangible satisfaction of physical interaction.
Designer and maker Nick DeMarco created a simple yet effective laptop stand using just a single sheet of recycled paper. By cleverly folding the paper using a series of creases, he formed a sturdy structure capable of supporting a laptop. The design is lightweight, portable, easily replicated, and demonstrates a resourceful approach to utilizing readily available materials. The stand is specifically designed for smaller, lighter laptops and aims to improve ergonomics by raising the screen to a more comfortable viewing height.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed skepticism about the practicality and durability of the single-sheet paper laptop stand. Several questioned its ability to support the weight of a laptop, especially over extended periods, and predicted it would quickly collapse or tear. Some suggested that while it might work for lighter devices like tablets, it wouldn't be suitable for heavier laptops. Others pointed out the potential for instability and wobbling. There was some discussion of alternative DIY laptop stand solutions, including using cardboard or other more robust materials. A few commenters appreciated the minimalist and eco-friendly concept, but overall the sentiment was that the design was more of a novelty than a practical solution.
Summary of Comments ( 54 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42960144
Hacker News users generally expressed skepticism and amusement towards the "Paper Apps" concept. Many questioned the practicality and value proposition of physical paper versions of digital apps, particularly given their cost. Some saw them as a novelty or gag gift. Several commenters pointed out the irony of meticulously recreating digital interfaces in a physical format, highlighting the inherent limitations and lack of functionality compared to their digital counterparts. Others drew parallels to existing paper-based productivity tools, suggesting the idea wasn't entirely novel. A few appreciated the aesthetic and tactile aspects, but the overall sentiment leaned towards viewing them as a whimsical but ultimately impractical exercise.
The Hacker News post titled "Paper Apps" discussing the website gladdendesign.com/collections/paper-apps has generated several comments. Many of the comments revolve around the practicality, aesthetic appeal, and niche nature of paper-based productivity tools in a digitally dominated world.
Several commenters express appreciation for the aesthetic and tactile qualities of paper products. They acknowledge a certain charm and satisfaction associated with physical objects and analog systems. This appreciation extends to the perceived intentionality and focus that using paper can foster, contrasting it with the distractions often associated with digital devices.
A recurring theme is the balance between digital and analog tools. Some commenters share their personal experiences of integrating both, using paper for specific tasks like brainstorming, note-taking, or project planning while relying on digital tools for others. This hybrid approach highlights the strengths of each medium, suggesting that they can complement rather than compete with each other.
The niche appeal of these products is also discussed. While acknowledging the allure of paper-based systems, commenters recognize that such products cater to a specific audience. The price point is mentioned as a potential barrier for wider adoption, with some suggesting that the perceived value might not align with the cost for everyone.
The practicality of paper apps in the modern workflow is debated. Some question the long-term viability and scalability of paper-based systems, particularly for complex projects or collaborative work. Concerns are raised about searchability, portability, and the potential for loss or damage compared to digital alternatives.
Finally, the discussion touches upon the environmental impact of paper products. While the website mentions sustainable practices, some commenters express concerns about the inherent resource consumption associated with paper production.
Overall, the comments reflect a nuanced perspective on the role of paper-based tools in a digital age. While acknowledging their limitations, many commenters appreciate the tangible and aesthetic qualities of paper, suggesting a continued relevance for specific use cases and individuals who value the analog experience.