Tesla is recalling nearly 380,000 vehicles in the US due to a power steering assist fault. The recall affects Model S and X vehicles from 2017-2023, specifically those equipped with full self-driving (FSD) Beta software or pending installation. The issue can cause the power steering to intermittently fail, especially at low speeds or after hitting a bump, requiring increased steering effort and potentially increasing the risk of a crash. An over-the-air software update will address the problem.
BYD plans to incorporate its advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS), comparable to Tesla's Autopilot, into all its vehicle models. This technology, developed in-house and not reliant on third-party systems like Nvidia's, will be offered free of charge to customers. BYD emphasizes its self-sufficiency in developing this system, claiming it offers better integration and cost-effectiveness. The rollout will begin with the upcoming Seagull model, followed by other vehicles in the lineup throughout the year.
Hacker News commenters are skeptical of BYD's claim to offer "Tesla-like" self-driving tech for free. Several point out that "free" likely means bundled into the car price, not actually gratis. Others question the capabilities of the system, doubting it's truly comparable to Tesla's Autopilot or Full Self-Driving, citing the lack of detail provided by BYD. Some express concern over the potential safety implications of offering advanced driver-assistance systems without proper explanation and consumer education. A few commenters note BYD's vertical integration, suggesting they might be able to offer the technology at a lower cost than competitors. Overall, the sentiment is one of cautious disbelief, awaiting more concrete information from BYD.
Driven by curiosity and a penchant for the unusual, the author sampled Honda's rodent-repelling tape, designed to deter critters from chewing car wiring. The tape, infused with capsaicin, delivered a potent, lingering burn that surprised and impressed. Despite the intensity, the author found the experience oddly enjoyable, appreciating the unique flavor and comparing it favorably to spicy candies. Ultimately, they declared their willingness to taste the tape again, emphasizing its effectiveness and unusual culinary appeal.
Hacker News users generally found the article amusing and intriguing. Several commenters discussed their own experiences with rodent problems and various repellents, with some suggesting alternative methods like peppermint oil or Irish Spring soap. Some expressed skepticism about the tape's effectiveness, questioning whether the capsaicin would deter rodents in the long run or simply cause them to chew elsewhere. A few users were concerned about the potential harm to pets, while others joked about the author's dedication to investigative journalism. The most compelling comments offered alternative solutions based on personal experience or questioned the logic of the tape's design, wondering if it would truly solve the underlying rodent problem.
Filmmakers used a variety of techniques to create the illusion of cars dramatically falling apart in older movies. These included pre-cutting and weakening parts of the car's body, strategically placed explosives for impactful breakaways, and using lighter materials like balsa wood or fiberglass for certain components. Sometimes, entire cars were constructed specifically for stunts, built with weaker structures and designed to collapse easily on impact. These methods, combined with clever camera angles and editing, conveyed a convincing sense of destruction without endangering the stunt performers.
Hacker News users discussed various methods used in older films to create the illusion of cars dramatically falling apart during crashes. Several commenters emphasized the use of strategically placed explosives, cables, and pre-weakened parts like bumpers and doors, often held together with easily-breakable balsa wood or piano wire. Some highlighted the lower speeds used in filming, allowing for more controlled destruction and less risk to stunt performers. Others pointed to the exaggerated nature of these breakups for comedic or dramatic effect, not aiming for realism. The overall consensus was that a combination of practical effects tailored to the specific shot created the desired over-the-top disintegration of vehicles seen in classic movies. A few users also mentioned the difference in car construction then versus now, with older cars being built less rigidly, contributing to the effect.
Summary of Comments ( 139 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43128987
HN commenters discuss the vagueness of the recall notice, questioning whether it's a software or hardware issue, and how a software update could resolve a "loss of power steering assist." Some express skepticism about Tesla's reliance on over-the-air updates for safety-critical systems, noting the potential for unforeseen software bugs. Others point out the increasing frequency of Tesla recalls and question the robustness of their initial quality control. A few commenters share personal anecdotes of similar issues with their Teslas, highlighting concerns about safety and the inconvenience of these recurring problems. Some also mention the potential impact on Tesla's reputation and the broader implications for the autonomous driving industry.
The Hacker News post discussing the Tesla recall of 380,000 vehicles due to a power steering issue generated a moderate amount of discussion, with a mix of skepticism, technical analysis, and comparisons to other automakers.
Several commenters questioned the framing of the issue as a "recall," pointing out that it's an over-the-air software update rather than a physical repair. They argued this highlights the difference between Tesla's software-centric approach and traditional automakers, where such an issue might necessitate a trip to a dealership. This sparked a debate about the semantics of "recall" in the context of software updates, with some arguing that the term is still appropriate due to the safety implications, while others viewed it as unnecessarily alarmist.
Some users delved into the technical aspects, speculating about the potential root cause of the problem. One commenter with apparent software engineering experience suggested that the issue might stem from Tesla prioritizing power efficiency in their steering assist algorithm, leading to premature wear on the electric motor. This theory tied into a broader discussion about Tesla's engineering choices, with some praising their innovative approach while others criticized a perceived focus on cost-cutting over robustness.
Comparisons to other automakers were also prevalent. Some commenters pointed out that all manufacturers experience recalls, arguing that the Tesla situation isn't unique or particularly alarming. Others contrasted Tesla's over-the-air update solution with the more cumbersome processes required by traditional automakers, highlighting the potential benefits of Tesla's software-driven approach.
A few comments focused on the user experience aspect. One commenter shared their personal experience with the issue, describing the steering as becoming progressively heavier, particularly at low speeds. This anecdotal evidence added a real-world perspective to the technical discussions.
Finally, there was some discussion regarding the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)'s involvement, with some speculation about the agency's potential influence on Tesla's decision to issue the update. However, this aspect of the conversation remained largely speculative.
Overall, the comments reflect a nuanced perspective on the recall, acknowledging the seriousness of the safety issue while also considering the specific context of Tesla's software-centric approach and comparing it to traditional automotive practices. The discussion demonstrates a keen interest in the technical details of the issue, the broader implications for the automotive industry, and the real-world impact on Tesla owners.