The Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing over the 101 freeway in Los Angeles has reached a major milestone with the completion of its bridge structure. This project, the world's largest wildlife crossing, aims to provide safe passage for mountain lions and other animals, connecting fragmented habitats and promoting genetic diversity. While the bridge itself is finished, significant work remains, including landscaping with native vegetation and installing sound walls and fencing to guide animals toward the crossing. Funding also needs to be secured for ongoing maintenance and monitoring to evaluate the crossing's effectiveness.
Ironically, birds like magpies and crows are using anti-bird spikes, intended to deter them from nesting, as nesting material. These intelligent corvids incorporate the sharp spikes into their nests, potentially providing extra protection against predators or strengthening the nest structure. While the spikes may deter some smaller birds, they've inadvertently provided resourceful corvids with a readily available and robust building material, highlighting the adaptability and ingenuity of these species.
HN commenters generally found the magpies' adaptation of anti-bird spikes for nest-building amusing and a testament to their intelligence. Some pointed out the irony of humans trying to outsmart nature, only to have nature adapt and use the "defense" to its advantage. A few noted the sturdiness and readily available nature of the spikes as ideal nest-building material, comparing it to humans repurposing materials. Others expressed concern that the spikes could injure the birds or their young, while some dismissed this concern based on the birds' apparent ability to navigate the spikes safely. The potential for increased nest security due to the spikes was also mentioned. Finally, some commenters shared similar anecdotal observations of birds using human-made materials in unexpected ways for nest construction.
While squirrels are typically known for their herbivorous diet of nuts and seeds, recent observations and studies have confirmed that they also consume meat. Documented instances include squirrels preying on small animals like birds, snakes, and insects, sometimes even engaging in cannibalism. This carnivorous behavior, though surprising to some, is not entirely new and is likely driven by nutritional needs, especially protein scarcity during certain times of the year. These findings highlight the adaptable nature of squirrels and their broader role within the ecosystem.
Several Hacker News commenters point out that squirrels eating meat isn't novel or surprising. Many share personal anecdotes of observing squirrels consuming meat, including baby birds, roadkill, and even leftover chicken wings. Some highlight that squirrels are rodents, and rodents are opportunistic omnivores, so this behavior is expected. A few commenters criticize Gizmodo's reporting, suggesting the headline is sensationalized and misleading. Others discuss the adaptability of squirrels and their ability to thrive in various environments, with their diet reflecting available resources. Finally, some users humorously compare squirrels' opportunistic eating habits to their own scavenging for leftovers.
Summary of Comments ( 18 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43550072
HN commenters largely praised the wildlife crossing project, viewing it as a positive step towards mitigating human impact on animal populations and ecosystems. Some expressed hope that it would serve as a model for similar projects elsewhere. A few questioned the long-term effectiveness and pointed to the need for more comprehensive habitat restoration, arguing that crossings alone wouldn't fully address the root issues of habitat fragmentation. Some discussion also revolved around the types of animals expected to use the crossing and how its success would be measured. One commenter highlighted the project's funding model, emphasizing the significant private contribution which they found encouraging. There was a brief exchange about the potential for increased roadkill on smaller nearby roads due to animals funneling through the crossing.
The Hacker News post "World's largest wildlife crossing reaches critical milestone. Now what?" generated a moderate number of comments discussing the wildlife crossing and its potential impact. Several commenters expressed excitement about the project and its potential to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions and improve habitat connectivity.
Some users questioned the "world's largest" claim, pointing to other existing or planned crossings they believed to be larger, particularly in Europe. This sparked a discussion about different methodologies for measuring size and what constitutes a "wildlife crossing" versus other types of animal passages. One commenter shared a link to a supposedly larger crossing in the Netherlands.
A few commenters raised concerns about the long-term effectiveness and maintenance of such structures. They questioned whether animals would actually use the crossing and whether it would truly mitigate the impact of the highway. One user pointed out the need for ongoing vegetation management on and around the crossing to ensure its attractiveness to wildlife. Another commenter expressed skepticism about the project's overall benefit, suggesting that the funds might have been better spent elsewhere.
Several comments focused on the importance of habitat connectivity and the broader ecological context of the crossing. They discussed the fragmentation of habitats caused by roads and the need for more such projects to mitigate these effects. Some users also mentioned the potential benefits for specific species, such as mountain lions.
A couple of comments delved into the technical aspects of the crossing's design and construction, including the use of different materials and the challenges of building such a large structure. One user asked about the lighting used on the crossing and its potential impact on nocturnal animals.
Finally, some comments addressed the "Now what?" aspect of the title, speculating about future developments and the need for further research and monitoring to assess the crossing's effectiveness. One commenter suggested incorporating technology, such as wildlife tracking, to monitor usage patterns and inform future conservation efforts.