SuperUtilsPlus is a modern JavaScript utility library presented as a lightweight, tree-shakable alternative to Lodash. It aims to provide commonly used functions with a focus on modern JavaScript syntax and practices, resulting in smaller bundle sizes for projects that only need a subset of utility functions. The library is type-safe with TypeScript support and boasts improved performance compared to Lodash for specific operations. It covers areas like array manipulation, object handling, string functions, date/time utilities, and functional programming helpers.
A Hacker News post introduces SuperUtilsPlus, a JavaScript utility library positioned as a contemporary alternative to the widely-used Lodash library. The author presents SuperUtilsPlus as a lightweight, performant, and tree-shakable solution designed to address some of the perceived shortcomings of Lodash, particularly its size and potential for importing unused functions.
SuperUtilsPlus provides a comprehensive suite of utility functions categorized for various common JavaScript operations. These categories include array manipulation (such as filtering, mapping, and reducing arrays), object manipulation (like merging, cloning, and picking properties), string manipulation (including functions for capitalization, trimming, and padding), number utilities (offering functions for rounding, clamping, and random number generation), date/time manipulation (providing methods for formatting dates and calculating time differences), function utilities (including functions for debouncing, throttling, and currying), and utility functions covering a range of other operations like deep comparisons, checking data types, and working with regular expressions.
The library emphasizes modularity, enabling developers to import only the specific functions they need, which can significantly reduce the final bundle size of a JavaScript application. This granular import capability contrasts with Lodash, where even importing a single function can potentially pull in a significant portion of the library. The stated goal of SuperUtilsPlus is to offer a modern, streamlined alternative that delivers similar functionality with a smaller footprint and improved performance, particularly in contexts sensitive to bundle size. The project’s documentation, hosted on GitHub, provides detailed explanations and examples of each available function, facilitating easy integration and usage for developers seeking a Lodash replacement.
Summary of Comments ( 39 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080808
Hacker News users generally reacted negatively to SuperUtilsPlus. Several commenters questioned the need for another utility library, especially given the maturity and wide adoption of Lodash. Some criticized the naming convention and the overall design of the library, pointing out potential performance issues and unnecessary abstractions. Others questioned the claimed benefits over Lodash, expressing skepticism about significant performance improvements or a more modern API. The usefulness of the included "enhanced" DOM manipulation functions was also debated, with some arguing that direct DOM manipulation is often preferable. A few users expressed mild interest, suggesting specific areas where the library could be improved, but overall the reception was cool.
The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: SuperUtilsPlus – A Modern Alternative to Lodash" generated several comments discussing the library and its utility. Here's a summary of the discussion:
Concerns about real-world use and maintenance: Several commenters questioned the practical need for another utility library, especially given the prevalence and maturity of established options like Lodash and native JavaScript methods. They expressed skepticism about the long-term maintenance and support of a smaller, newer project. One user specifically mentioned their preference for sticking with widely-used libraries due to community support and the higher likelihood of long-term maintenance. This sentiment was echoed by another user who expressed concern about the project's longevity, given that many similar projects tend to be abandoned after the initial enthusiasm fades.
Comparison to Lodash and native JS methods: Commenters discussed how SuperUtilsPlus compared to Lodash in terms of functionality and performance. Some highlighted that many of the provided utilities are already readily available in Lodash or achievable with concise native JavaScript code. They questioned whether SuperUtilsPlus offered sufficient advantages to justify switching from or adding it alongside Lodash. A specific comment noted that for simpler operations, native JavaScript often suffices. Another user pointed out the potential overhead of adding another dependency, advocating for utilizing existing libraries or native JavaScript features when possible.
Discussion about bundle size and tree-shaking: The size of the library and its impact on bundle size were also points of discussion. One user suggested that the author provide information on bundle size, especially considering the project's positioning as a lightweight alternative. They also inquired about the library's compatibility with tree-shaking, a technique to remove unused code, which is essential for minimizing bundle size.
Feedback on specific functions: Some comments delved into specific functions provided by SuperUtilsPlus, comparing their implementation to Lodash equivalents or suggesting improvements. One user pointed out that some functions, like
castArray, already exist in Lodash. They suggested the author focus on providing truly unique and valuable utilities that fill gaps in existing libraries.Appreciation for the project and encouragement: Despite the concerns, some commenters expressed appreciation for the project, viewing it as a potentially useful tool and encouraging the author to continue its development. They acknowledged the value of having different options and recognized the effort put into creating the library.
Overall, the comments reflected a cautious but engaged response to SuperUtilsPlus. While there was interest in the concept of a modern utility library, commenters raised significant questions about its practicality, necessity, and long-term viability compared to well-established alternatives and native JavaScript solutions. The discussion emphasized the importance of considering factors like maintenance, bundle size, and unique functionality when introducing a new library.