Uber is launching fixed-route shared shuttles in major US cities to address rising ride-hailing costs and provide a more affordable transit option. These shuttles will operate on predetermined routes and schedules, similar to a bus service, allowing riders to book seats in advance. This move aims to bridge the gap between Uber's on-demand services and public transportation, offering a cost-effective solution for commuters while increasing vehicle occupancy and potentially easing traffic congestion. The company is also exploring other cost-saving measures, including improved carpooling features.
This study investigated the effectiveness of trees and bus shelters in mitigating heat stress at bus stops in Tempe, Arizona. Researchers measured air temperature, relative humidity, globe temperature, and wind speed at bus stops with varying levels of shade and shelter. They found that both trees and shelters significantly reduced heat stress, with trees providing more cooling than shelters alone. The combination of trees and shelters offered the greatest heat stress reduction, highlighting the importance of incorporating both natural and built shade elements in urban design to improve thermal comfort for public transit users.
HN users discuss the study's methodology and its real-world implications. Some question the limited scope of the study, focusing on a single bus stop in Phoenix, and suggest that more research is needed across various climates and urban designs. Several commenters emphasize the importance of tree placement and canopy coverage for effective cooling, noting that poorly positioned trees can actually exacerbate heat. Others highlight the need for holistic urban planning that incorporates green infrastructure, shading structures, and public transit improvements to mitigate urban heat island effects. A few users also discuss the societal and equity implications of heat stress, particularly for vulnerable populations. Finally, some commenters share anecdotal experiences and observations regarding the effectiveness of different shading strategies.
Summary of Comments ( 189 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43985861
Hacker News users discuss Uber's move towards fixed-route shuttles with skepticism and comparisons to existing public transit. Many see this as a regression, arguing that Uber and other ride-sharing services initially pitched themselves as a replacement for fixed routes, only to now attempt to replicate a system they aimed to disrupt. Some question the viability of private companies efficiently running public transit, citing potential issues with profitability and service reliability. Others suggest this move is a tacit admission that the original ride-sharing model isn't economically sustainable in the long run. Several commenters point to the inherent advantages of existing, heavily subsidized public transit systems, while some see Uber's move as a potential positive if it can integrate effectively with existing infrastructure. The overall sentiment leans towards doubt about Uber's ability to execute this effectively and economically.
The Hacker News post "Uber to introduce fixed-route shuttles in major US cities" has generated several comments discussing the potential implications of Uber's move. Many commenters express skepticism about the viability and long-term success of this venture.
A recurring theme is the comparison to previous attempts at private transit solutions, with several users citing examples of failed startups and initiatives. Commenters question whether Uber can overcome the challenges that plagued these predecessors, particularly the difficulty of achieving profitability and competing with established public transit systems, especially given the subsidies public transit often receives.
Some commenters speculate on Uber's motivations. Some suggest this move is driven by a desire to diversify revenue streams and explore new markets, while others believe it's a tactic to improve public image and address criticisms related to congestion and its impact on public transportation. There's also discussion about whether Uber's ultimate goal is to replace or supplement existing public transit systems, with some expressing concern about the potential for undermining public transit infrastructure.
The practicality and efficiency of fixed routes for a service like Uber are also debated. Some commenters argue that fixed routes are antithetical to the core concept of ride-hailing and that Uber's strength lies in its flexible, on-demand nature. Concerns are raised about the potential for longer wait times, less convenient routes, and the challenges of managing schedules and capacity on fixed routes.
Several comments touch upon the regulatory landscape and the potential hurdles Uber might face in implementing fixed routes. The complexities of navigating regulations related to public transit, permits, and competition are discussed, with some commenters suggesting that Uber might encounter resistance from existing transit operators and regulatory bodies.
Finally, some commenters express a cautious optimism, suggesting that Uber's resources and technology could potentially bring innovation to the public transit space. However, this optimism is generally tempered with skepticism and a wait-and-see attitude, with many emphasizing the need for Uber to demonstrate a clear path to profitability and address the concerns raised about competition and integration with existing transit systems. The overall sentiment leans towards skepticism, with many commenters doubtful that Uber can successfully navigate the complex challenges of the public transit landscape.