USENIX has announced the cancellation of the in-person component of the 2024 ATC conference in Boston due to escalating costs, primarily venue and hotel expenses exceeding initial projections. While disappointed about this change, USENIX remains committed to holding a high-quality virtual conference experience during the original dates of July 17-19, 2024. Accepted papers will still be published in the conference proceedings, and authors will have the opportunity to present their work virtually. USENIX is exploring ways to potentially organize smaller, in-person gatherings focused on specific technical tracks during the same timeframe, but details are yet to be finalized. They are actively seeking alternative solutions for future ATCs and look forward to returning to a hybrid format in subsequent years.
Facing a worsening air traffic controller shortage, the FAA is increasing incentives to attract and retain controllers. These include bonuses of up to $50,000 for controllers at some critical facilities and a streamlined hiring process that prioritizes veterans and those with prior experience. The agency emphasizes the importance of these positions for maintaining safe and efficient air travel, especially with increasing flight demands. The FAA aims to hire 1,500 controllers this year and 1,800 in 2025 to alleviate the strain on the existing workforce.
HN commenters discuss several contributing factors to the air traffic controller shortage. Some point to the FAA's hiring practices, citing difficulties with the biographical questionnaire and the Air Traffic Selection and Training (AT-SAT) test, arguing that these methods don't effectively identify qualified candidates. Others highlight the stressful nature of the job, coupled with mandatory retirement at 56, as deterrents. The lack of flexibility in location for trainees, who must relocate to Oklahoma City, is also mentioned as an obstacle. Some commenters propose solutions, such as allowing controllers to work past 56, streamlining the hiring process, and increasing automation. A few suggest that the reported shortage is exaggerated or part of a union strategy.
Summary of Comments ( 8 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43933511
The Hacker News comments express disappointment and frustration with USENIX's decision to hold their Advanced Technical Conference (ATC) in Boston, citing high costs, difficult visa processes for international attendees, and Massachusetts' generally unfriendly political climate (particularly regarding abortion access). Some commenters suggest alternative, more accessible locations and question the conference organizers' rationale. Several point out the hypocrisy of USENIX's stated commitment to diversity and inclusion while choosing a location that presents barriers for many. There's a sense of betrayal among long-time attendees, with some vowing to boycott the event. A few commenters offer counterpoints, mentioning Boston's strong technical scene and suggesting that USENIX might have negotiated favorable rates. However, these comments are largely overshadowed by the negative sentiment.
The Hacker News post titled "Usenix ATC Announcement" (linking to a blog post about the USENIX Annual Technical Conference) has a modest number of comments, sparking a brief discussion around the conference and USENIX in general. No single comment stands out as overwhelmingly compelling, but a few recurring themes and noteworthy points emerge.
Several comments focus on the high cost of USENIX conferences. One user laments the expense, particularly for students and those from developing countries, suggesting it creates a barrier to entry. Another concurs, pointing out the high cost of membership and wondering if it's truly worthwhile. This concern about inclusivity and accessibility underscores a potential issue with the conference's pricing model.
Another thread discusses the quality and relevance of USENIX conferences, specifically ATC. One commenter notes the conference's historical prestige and influence within the systems research community, but expresses some uncertainty about its current standing. They question whether ATC remains a top-tier venue for cutting-edge systems research or if its importance has diminished. Another comment emphasizes the conference's consistently high-quality program and the valuable networking opportunities it provides. This exchange reflects a nuanced perspective on the conference's ongoing role in the field.
A couple of comments mention the unique culture and atmosphere of USENIX events. One user praises the "single track" format, highlighting the benefit of having all attendees focused on the same presentations, fostering a sense of shared experience and deeper engagement. Another commenter appreciates the community's emphasis on rigorous technical discussions and in-depth analysis. These comments shed light on the aspects that distinguish USENIX conferences from other technical gatherings.
Finally, one commenter raises a practical point about the location of the conference (Boston), noting the city's high hotel costs and suggesting attendees book accommodations early. This provides a helpful tip for anyone considering attending.
In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post offer a mixed bag of perspectives on the USENIX ATC announcement. While some express concerns about the conference's cost and relevance, others affirm its value, highlighting its historical significance, strong technical program, and unique community atmosphere. The discussion, while not extensive, provides a glimpse into the varied opinions within the tech community regarding USENIX and its conferences.