Residents of Hydra are complaining about abandoned vehicles left on the island after construction projects are completed. These vehicles, including trucks and diggers, are reportedly an eyesore and take up valuable space on the already limited streets and port areas. Locals claim that contractors bring the vehicles over for work and then simply leave them behind, rather than incurring the cost of transporting them back to the mainland. This practice is causing growing frustration among islanders concerned about the impact on Hydra's aesthetic and the inconvenience caused by the abandoned machinery.
Ukraine has an opportunity to redefine its architectural identity after the war, moving away from the imposing, standardized Soviet-era structures that dominate its landscape. The article argues that rebuilding should prioritize human-scale design, incorporating sustainable practices and reflecting Ukrainian culture and heritage. This approach would create more livable and aesthetically pleasing spaces, foster a stronger sense of national identity, and symbolize a decisive break from the country's Soviet past. The author emphasizes the importance of urban planning that prioritizes pedestrians and green spaces, suggesting a shift towards decentralized, community-focused development.
Hacker News users discuss the feasibility and desirability of Ukraine rebuilding with a focus on traditional architecture, as suggested in the linked article. Some commenters are skeptical, citing the cost and practicality of such an undertaking, particularly given the ongoing war and the existing housing shortage. Others express concern that focusing on aesthetics during wartime is misplaced. However, several support the idea, arguing that rebuilding with traditional styles could foster a stronger sense of national identity and create more beautiful, human-scaled cities. A few point out that pre-Soviet Ukrainian architecture was diverse and regional, making a single "traditional" style difficult to define. The discussion also touches on the role of Soviet-era buildings in Ukrainian history and the challenges of preserving architectural heritage while modernizing.
A new bicycle-mounted sensor called Proxicycle aims to improve the mapping of safe cycling routes. It uses ultrasonic sensors to detect passing vehicles and their proximity, collecting data on near-miss incidents and overall road safety for cyclists. This data can then be aggregated and shared with city planners and cycling advocacy groups to inform infrastructure improvements, advocate for safer road design, and ultimately create more cyclist-friendly environments. Proxicycle's goal is to provide a more comprehensive and data-driven approach to identifying dangerous areas and promoting evidence-based solutions for cycling safety.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and potential impact of the Proxicycle sensor. Several commenters were skeptical of its ability to accurately assess safety, pointing out that near misses wouldn't be registered and that subjective perceptions of safety vary widely. Some suggested existing apps like Strava already provide similar crowd-sourced data, while others questioned the sensor's robustness and the potential for misuse or manipulation of the data. The idea of using the data to advocate for cycling infrastructure improvements was generally well-received, though some doubted its effectiveness. A few commenters expressed interest in the open-source nature of the project and the possibility of using the data for other purposes like route planning. Overall, the comments leaned towards cautious optimism tempered by practical concerns.
Shanghai is experimenting with a crowdsourced bus system where residents can suggest and vote on customized bus routes. These "customized bus lines" cater to specific commuter needs, offering more direct routes and convenient stops based on popular demand. The program aims to improve public transit efficiency and address the "last mile" problem, particularly benefiting commuters in less densely populated areas or those with unconventional work schedules. The pilot program has seen strong initial interest, with thousands of suggested routes and numerous lines already operating, proving a popular supplement to the city's existing fixed-route bus network.
Hacker News commenters discuss the impracticality of Shanghai's proposed on-demand bus system, citing issues with scaling, routing efficiency, and the potential for gaming the system by individual riders. Some doubt the "design your own route" claim, suggesting it's more likely a system for proposing new fixed routes or adjusting existing ones based on community input. Others compare it to existing dial-a-ride services or express bus systems, arguing this isn't truly innovative. A few express cautious optimism, hoping for a successful implementation despite the challenges, and suggesting potential benefits like reduced congestion and personalized commutes. Several also raise concerns about potential abuse and unfairness if riders with longer commutes or those living in less populated areas are prioritized.
Traffic deaths are preventable, not inevitable accidents. The article argues that the US's high traffic fatality rate compared to other developed nations is a direct result of prioritizing car speed and convenience over safety. This manifests in roadway designs that encourage speeding, lax traffic law enforcement, and a cultural acceptance of risky driving behavior. By contrasting the US approach with European countries that have implemented systemic changes leading to drastically lower fatality rates, the author emphasizes that safer streets are a matter of political will and prioritizing human life over car-centric design. Choosing different design standards, stricter speed limit enforcement, and investing in safer infrastructure are all deliberate decisions that could significantly reduce traffic deaths.
Hacker News users discuss the societal choices that influence traffic fatalities, agreeing with the article's premise. Several commenters highlight the Netherlands as a successful example of prioritizing safety through infrastructure design and stricter traffic laws. Some discuss the trade-offs between convenience and safety, acknowledging that implementing effective changes often requires accepting some inconveniences. Others point out the role of lobbying by car manufacturers and the historical prioritization of car-centric infrastructure, arguing that these factors have contributed to higher fatality rates in places like the US. A few commenters mention the impact of driver behavior and education, while others emphasize the importance of automated safety features in vehicles. The overall sentiment is that reducing traffic deaths requires a systemic approach focusing on engineering, enforcement, and education.
This study investigated the effectiveness of trees and bus shelters in mitigating heat stress at bus stops in Tempe, Arizona. Researchers measured air temperature, relative humidity, globe temperature, and wind speed at bus stops with varying levels of shade and shelter. They found that both trees and shelters significantly reduced heat stress, with trees providing more cooling than shelters alone. The combination of trees and shelters offered the greatest heat stress reduction, highlighting the importance of incorporating both natural and built shade elements in urban design to improve thermal comfort for public transit users.
HN users discuss the study's methodology and its real-world implications. Some question the limited scope of the study, focusing on a single bus stop in Phoenix, and suggest that more research is needed across various climates and urban designs. Several commenters emphasize the importance of tree placement and canopy coverage for effective cooling, noting that poorly positioned trees can actually exacerbate heat. Others highlight the need for holistic urban planning that incorporates green infrastructure, shading structures, and public transit improvements to mitigate urban heat island effects. A few users also discuss the societal and equity implications of heat stress, particularly for vulnerable populations. Finally, some commenters share anecdotal experiences and observations regarding the effectiveness of different shading strategies.
This photo essay showcases Chongqing, a sprawling metropolis in southwest China. The images capture the city's unique blend of mountainous terrain and dense urban development, highlighting its layered infrastructure, including towering skyscrapers, bridges crisscrossing rivers and valleys, and a bustling port. The photographs also offer glimpses into daily life, depicting crowded streets, traditional architecture alongside modern buildings, and the city's vibrant energy.
Hacker News users discuss the impressive scale and visual impact of Chongqing, depicted in The Guardian's photo series. Several commenters express fascination with the city's unique geography and density, with its mountainous terrain and towering skyscrapers. Some debate the definition of "largest city," distinguishing between metropolitan area and city proper populations. Others highlight the article's striking visuals, particularly the layering of infrastructure and buildings clinging to the hillsides. A few commenters also mention Chongqing's historical significance and rapid development. The overall sentiment reflects awe and curiosity about this lesser-known megacity.
Paris's efforts to reduce car traffic have resulted in a significant drop in air pollution. After implementing policies like pedestrianizing streets, expanding bike lanes, and restricting car access, nitrogen dioxide levels have decreased dramatically, particularly in the city center. This improvement in air quality translates to substantial health benefits for residents, with fewer premature deaths and respiratory illnesses anticipated. While some areas still experience elevated pollution levels, the overall trend demonstrates the positive impact of prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists over cars.
HN commenters generally agree with the premise that reducing car traffic improves air pollution, citing Paris as a successful example. Several highlight the importance of prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists, suggesting this benefits both the environment and public health. Some discuss the challenges of such transitions, including political resistance and the need for robust public transport alternatives. A few express skepticism about the study's methodology, questioning whether the measured improvements are solely attributable to reduced car traffic or influenced by other factors like weather patterns. One commenter points to the positive impact of electric vehicles, while another raises concerns about the potential displacement of pollution to surrounding areas.
The article argues that big box stores, while appearing to offer lower prices and convenience, ultimately harm small towns. Their business model extracts wealth from the community, leading to a decline in local businesses, reduced tax revenue, and a degradation of the overall quality of life. This extraction is driven by factors like centralized profits, externalized costs (like road maintenance and infrastructure), and the suppression of local wages. The piece advocates for policies and citizen action that support locally-owned businesses, fostering resilient and financially sustainable communities in the long run.
Hacker News users discuss the struggles small towns face against big box stores, focusing on the inherent advantages of scale and efficiency these corporations possess. Commenters highlight the difficulty local businesses have competing on price and the allure of one-stop shopping for consumers. Some point out that big box stores often receive tax breaks and subsidies, further tilting the playing field. Others suggest that focusing on niche products, personalized service, and community building are key survival strategies for small businesses. The conversation also touches on the broader societal costs of big box retail, such as the decline of town centers and the homogenization of local culture. Finally, there's acknowledgement that consumer choices ultimately drive the market, and changing shopping habits is crucial for revitalizing small town economies.
The "Housing Theory of Everything" argues that restrictive housing policies in prosperous cities have cascading negative effects across society. By artificially limiting housing supply through zoning and other regulations, these cities drive up housing costs, exacerbating inequality and hindering economic growth. This impacts everything from family formation and geographic mobility to innovation and political polarization. High housing costs force people to live further from job centers, increasing commute times and contributing to climate change. The theory posits that reforming housing policy to allow for significantly more density would unlock a range of societal benefits, fostering greater dynamism, affordability, and opportunity.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the premise of the linked article, that housing shortages significantly impact various societal issues. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes about the difficulties of finding affordable housing and its cascading effects on their lives. Some discussed the complexities of zoning laws and NIMBYism, highlighting how they perpetuate the housing crisis. Others pointed out the article's US-centric focus and how housing shortages manifest differently in other countries. The discussion also touched upon potential solutions, including increasing density, reforming zoning regulations, and exploring alternative housing models. A few commenters questioned the article's broad claims, arguing that while housing is a critical factor, it doesn't explain "everything." The most compelling comments offered personal experiences illustrating the real-world consequences of the housing crisis and thoughtful critiques of current housing policies.
NYC relies on aging, polluting "peaker plants" to meet electricity demand during peak usage. These plants, often located in disadvantaged communities, burn fossil fuels and contribute significantly to air pollution. While renewable energy sources are growing, they are not yet sufficient to handle peak loads, making these plants, despite their environmental impact, a necessary evil for grid stability in the near future. The city is working to transition away from these plants through initiatives like increasing battery storage and promoting energy efficiency, but a complete phase-out remains a complex challenge.
Hacker News commenters discuss the complexities of NYC's reliance on peaker plants. Several highlight the trade-off between pollution and reliability, acknowledging the necessity of these plants during peak demand, even if undesirable. Some suggest exploring demand-side management and battery storage as alternatives, while others point to the slow pace of transmission upgrades as a hindering factor. The economic incentives for peaker plant operators are also discussed, with some arguing that the current system rewards pollution. A few commenters mention the environmental justice implications, emphasizing the disproportionate impact of these plants on marginalized communities. Finally, the possibility of microgrids and localized power generation is raised as a potential long-term solution.
Donald Shoup, a UCLA urban planning professor, revolutionized parking policy by highlighting its hidden costs and advocating for market-based solutions. His influential book, The High Cost of Free Parking, argues that artificially low or free parking minimums lead to increased traffic congestion, sprawling development, and environmental harm. Shoup champions removing minimum parking requirements and implementing dynamic pricing, where parking prices adjust based on demand, ensuring availability and generating revenue that can be reinvested in the community. This approach aims to create more efficient, livable, and sustainable cities.
Hacker News users discussed the inflexibility of Shoup's parking model, particularly its struggles to adapt to changing demand (e.g., increased deliveries, ride-sharing). Some commenters argued that dynamic pricing, while theoretically sound, often faces political resistance and implementation challenges due to public perception and bureaucratic hurdles. Others pointed out that Shoup's focus on eliminating minimum parking requirements, while beneficial, doesn't fully address broader urban planning issues. The thread also touched upon the limitations of modeling and the difficulty of predicting long-term trends in transportation. A few users shared personal anecdotes of cities successfully implementing Shoup's ideas, while others highlighted the complexities and unintended consequences that can arise.
TheretoWhere.com lets you visualize ideal housing locations in a city based on your personalized criteria. By inputting preferences like price range, commute time, proximity to amenities (parks, groceries, etc.), and preferred neighborhood vibes, the site generates a heatmap highlighting areas that best match your needs. This allows users to quickly identify promising neighborhoods and explore potential living areas based on their individualized priorities, making the often daunting process of apartment hunting or relocation more efficient and targeted.
HN users generally found the "theretowhere" website concept interesting, but criticized its execution. Several commenters pointed out the limited and US-centric data, making it less useful for those outside major American cities. The reliance on Zillow data was also questioned, with some noting Zillow's known inaccuracies and biases. Others criticized the UI/UX, citing slow load times and a cumbersome interface. Despite the flaws, some saw potential in the idea, suggesting improvements like incorporating more data sources, expanding geographic coverage, and allowing users to adjust weighting for different preferences. A few commenters questioned the overall utility of the heatmap approach, arguing that it oversimplifies a complex decision-making process.
The New Yorker article discusses the ongoing legal battle surrounding 432 Park Avenue, a supertall luxury skyscraper in Manhattan. The building suffers from numerous, serious structural defects, including swaying, creaking noises, and malfunctioning elevators, all stemming from its slender design and cost-cutting measures during construction. Residents, some of whom paid tens of millions for their apartments, are embroiled in a lawsuit against the developers, CIM Group and Macklowe Properties, alleging fraud and breach of contract. The article highlights the clash between the aspirational symbolism of these supertall structures and the flawed reality of their construction, raising questions about the future of such ambitious architectural projects.
HN commenters discuss the precarious financial situation of many supertall, luxury skyscrapers in New York City, echoing the article's concerns. Several highlight the inherent risk in developing these buildings, citing the long timelines, high costs, and dependence on fickle global markets. Some point to the broader issue of overbuilding and the potential for a real estate bubble burst, while others criticize the tax breaks given to developers and the lack of affordable housing options being created. The design of 432 Park Avenue, the building focused on in the article, is also discussed, with some finding its slenderness aesthetically displeasing and others speculating on the engineering challenges it presented. A few commenters expressed skepticism about the severity of the problems outlined in the article, suggesting that the issues are either overblown or typical of high-end construction.
Chicago is offering an unusual investment opportunity tied to the future revenue of its first casino, the Bally's Chicago casino. Investors can buy a "Chicago Casino Bond" that pays a variable rate based on a percentage of the casino's adjusted gross receipts. While offering potentially high returns, the investment carries significant risk as casino revenue is unpredictable. Factors like competition, economic downturns, and the casino's management could impact payouts, and there's no guarantee of principal return. Essentially, it's a bet on the long-term success of the casino itself.
HN commenters are skeptical of the investment opportunity presented, questioning the projected 16% IRR. Several point out the inherent risks in casino ventures, citing competition, changing regulations, and the reliance on optimistic revenue projections. Some highlight the unusual nature of the offering and the lack of transparency surrounding the investor's identity. The overall sentiment leans towards caution, with commenters advising a thorough due diligence process and expressing doubts about the viability of such a high return in a saturated market like Chicago. Some also suggest exploring publicly traded casino companies as a potentially safer alternative investment in the sector.
The interactive map on Subwaysheds.com visualizes how far you can travel on the New York City subway system within a 40-minute timeframe from any given station. By selecting a station, the map reveals a shaded area encompassing all reachable destinations within that time limit. This allows users to quickly grasp the relative accessibility of different parts of the city from various starting points, highlighting the subway's reach and potential travel limitations. The map demonstrates how travel times vary greatly depending on the station's location and the interconnectedness of the lines, with some stations offering access to a much wider area than others within the same 40-minute window.
Commenters on Hacker News largely praised the visualization and the technical execution of the "Subway Sheds" project, finding it both interesting and well-designed. Several appreciated the choice of 40 minutes as a relatable timeframe for commute planning. Some discussed the limitations of the visualization, noting it doesn't account for transfer time or walking to/from stations, and pointed out discrepancies with their own commute experiences. A few commenters offered suggestions for improvements, such as incorporating real-time data, displaying route options, and allowing users to input their own starting points and timeframes. Others shared anecdotal experiences of their commutes in different cities, comparing and contrasting them with the NYC subway system's reach as depicted in the visualization. A technical discussion also emerged regarding the algorithms and data used to generate the sheds, including the choice of using walking distances instead of incorporating bus routes.
Boston City Hall's Brutalist design emerged from a complex interplay of factors in the 1960s. Facing pressure to revitalize Scollay Square and embrace modernism, the city held an architectural competition. The winning design by Kallmann, McKinnell & Knowles, though initially controversial for its stark departure from traditional styles, aimed to embody democratic ideals with its open plaza and accessible interior. The project, part of a larger urban renewal effort, reflected the era's optimism about government's ability to solve social problems through architecture and urban planning. Despite its initial unpopularity, City Hall stands as a significant example of Brutalist architecture and a testament to the city's ambition for a modern future.
HN commenters discuss Boston City Hall's Brutalist architecture, mostly negatively. Several lament its ugliness and unfriendliness, comparing it to a parking garage or fortress. Some criticize its impracticality and lack of human scale, citing confusing navigation and wind tunnels. A few offer counterpoints, arguing that it's a significant example of Brutalist architecture, reflecting the era's optimism about government's role. One suggests its imposing design might have been intentional, meant to convey authority. The concrete's weathering and the surrounding plaza's design are also criticized. A couple of commenters express appreciation for the building's unique character, suggesting that its starkness has a certain appeal.
Summary of Comments ( 24 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44068119
HN commenters were skeptical of the article's claims that vehicles were simply abandoned after construction projects. Several suggested that the photos depicted vehicles used by locals, pointing out details like worn tires and personalized items inside. One commenter with apparent local knowledge explained that vehicle importation to Hydra is prohibited, leading to a system where islanders bring vehicles over temporarily for projects and then leave them, effectively "renting" them out informally to other residents. Others questioned the practicality and expense of transporting heavy equipment off a small island, suggesting it's more economical to leave them. The overall sentiment was that the article presented a simplistic and possibly inaccurate view of the situation.
The Hacker News post titled "Hydra: Vehicles on the island – 'After the works they abandon them here'" has generated several comments discussing the phenomenon of abandoned vehicles on Hydra, a Greek island.
Several commenters focus on the logistics and costs associated with removing vehicles from the island. One commenter points out the high cost of barging vehicles off the island, suggesting it's cheaper to simply abandon them. Another echoes this sentiment, mentioning the significant expense of transporting vehicles by sea and the lack of infrastructure to facilitate efficient removal. This cost, coupled with the potential difficulty of reselling older vehicles, is presented as a primary motivator for abandonment.
The discussion also touches on the potential environmental impact of these abandoned vehicles. One commenter raises concerns about the environmental damage caused by leaving vehicles to rust, highlighting the potential pollution from fluids and battery acid.
Some commenters propose solutions or alternative perspectives. One suggests a potential business opportunity in collecting and scrapping the abandoned vehicles, transforming the problem into a profitable venture. Another proposes implementing a deposit system for vehicles brought onto the island, incentivizing owners to remove them. This system would require owners to pay a deposit upon arrival, refundable upon departure with the vehicle.
The comments also delve into the regulations and enforcement surrounding vehicle abandonment on Hydra. One commenter questions the lack of legal consequences for abandoning vehicles and suggests the need for stricter enforcement and penalties. Another speculates about the potential ownership status of the abandoned vehicles, questioning whether they are truly abandoned or simply stored temporarily, and suggesting that the owners might reclaim them in the future. They also raise the possibility of implementing a registration system to track vehicle ownership and ensure accountability.
Finally, some commenters offer anecdotal observations and personal experiences related to abandoned vehicles on Hydra and other islands. One commenter notes having seen abandoned scooters on various islands, suggesting this is a widespread issue.
In essence, the comments section explores the economic, logistical, environmental, and regulatory aspects of the abandoned vehicle problem on Hydra, highlighting the complex interplay of factors contributing to the situation and proposing potential solutions for mitigation.