Stories with Tag Scams

• When flat rate movers won't answer your calls

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-05-03 20:44:56

  Verbose tl;dr

  The post details a frustrating experience with a flat-rate moving company that became unresponsive after receiving a deposit. The author describes how the company initially provided a low quote, leading to a signed contract and payment. However, communication ceased abruptly afterward, with calls and emails going unanswered. This left the author in a precarious situation close to their moving date, scrambling to find an alternative and potentially losing their deposit. The post emphasizes the importance of verifying moving company legitimacy and considering the risks associated with flat-rate quotes that seem too good to be true, suggesting they may be a tactic to secure business and then disappear.

  Aphyr's blog post, "When Flat Rate Movers Won't Answer Your Calls," recounts a deeply frustrating and anxiety-inducing experience with a purportedly "flat-rate" moving company. The author meticulously details the process of obtaining quotes, ultimately choosing a company advertising a seemingly straightforward flat rate, believing it would simplify the often-complex process of moving. However, this expectation of simplicity quickly unravelled. Upon the arrival of the movers, the initial fixed price was immediately disputed, with the movers claiming various unforeseen circumstances necessitating additional charges. These included assertions regarding the presence of more belongings than anticipated, the supposed difficulty in navigating stairs and elevators, and even the purportedly excessive weight of certain items. The author details the increasingly tense negotiations that ensued, describing the feeling of being trapped and pressured into agreeing to exorbitant and arbitrarily inflated fees. This feeling of powerlessness was compounded by the realization that refusing the movers' services at that juncture would leave the author stranded and without recourse, given the imminent need to vacate the premises.

  The blog post further delves into the deceptive practices commonly employed by unscrupulous moving companies, highlighting the intentional ambiguity and lack of transparency surrounding their pricing models. The author suggests that these companies exploit the inherent vulnerability of individuals in the midst of a move, who are often under significant time constraints and emotional stress. The author emphasizes the movers' deliberate strategy of delaying the revelation of hidden fees until the belongings are already loaded onto the truck, effectively holding the customer hostage. This tactic leaves the customer with the unenviable choice of acquiescing to the inflated demands or facing the logistical nightmare of unloading their possessions and scrambling to find alternative movers at the last minute. The post concludes with a cautionary warning to readers about the perils of flat-rate moving services and the importance of meticulous research and thorough vetting of potential movers to avoid falling prey to such predatory practices. The author underscores the crucial need for clear and comprehensive written contracts that explicitly outline all costs and potential contingencies, thereby safeguarding against the type of exploitative behavior detailed in the post.

  • moving
  • movers
  • flat rate movers
  • flat rate
  • Communication
  • customer service
  • Reliability
  • Scams
  • moving scams
  • logistics
  • Transportation
  • Contracts
  • estimates
  • hidden fees
  • consumer protection

  Summary of Comments ( 205 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43882150

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters largely sympathize with the author's frustrating experience with flat-rate movers. Several share similar stories of bait-and-switch tactics, hidden fees, and unresponsive communication from moving companies, particularly those advertising flat rates. Some suggest that the flat-rate model itself incentivizes these behaviors, as movers are motivated to take on more jobs than they can handle and then prioritize the most profitable ones. Others recommend getting binding, not just flat-rate, estimates and thoroughly vetting movers through reviews and recommendations. A few commenters offer alternative strategies, like renting a truck and hiring hourly labor or using a portable moving container service. The prevalent sentiment is that the moving industry lacks transparency and accountability, and consumers need to be extremely cautious to avoid scams and exploitative practices.

  The Hacker News post titled "When flat rate movers won't answer your calls" (linking to an article on aphyr.com about a frustrating moving experience) has a moderate number of comments, sparking a discussion around similar experiences and offering advice for navigating the moving industry.

  Several commenters share their own anecdotes of dealing with unreliable or shady moving companies. These stories echo the original post's author's frustrations, describing instances of movers failing to show up, drastically increasing the quoted price on moving day, or holding belongings hostage. One commenter details a particularly harrowing experience with a "rogue mover" who demanded an exorbitant sum of money above the agreed-upon price, threatening to keep their possessions otherwise.

  Another recurring theme in the comments is the prevalence of bait-and-switch tactics within the moving industry. Commenters describe how some companies lure customers in with attractively low flat rates, only to inflate the price significantly upon arrival, citing unforeseen circumstances or additional services. This reinforces the original post's warning about the potential pitfalls of flat-rate moving services.

  Several commenters offer practical advice and resources to help others avoid similar situations. Suggestions include thoroughly researching moving companies, checking reviews on multiple platforms (not just the company's website), obtaining detailed written estimates, and avoiding companies that demand large upfront payments. Some users specifically recommend using binding estimates to protect against unexpected price hikes. Others highlight the benefits of using brokers or aggregators that vet moving companies and provide more transparent pricing.

  Some comments delve into the regulatory aspects of the moving industry, discussing the difficulties of holding rogue movers accountable and the limited recourse available to consumers. One commenter points out the challenges of interstate vs. intrastate moves, noting differing regulations and levels of oversight.

  A few commenters offer alternative perspectives, suggesting that while bad actors exist, not all moving companies are inherently dishonest. They emphasize the importance of clear communication with the movers and understanding the terms of the contract. One commenter suggests that unexpected costs can sometimes arise due to legitimate factors, such as difficult access to the property or unforeseen packing complexities.

  While the overall sentiment reflects negativity toward the moving industry's practices, the comments provide valuable insights and advice for navigating this often stressful process. The shared experiences and recommendations contribute to a helpful discussion for those planning a move.

• Thailand to Cut Power to Myanmar Scam Hubs

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-23 03:22:04

  Verbose tl;dr

  Thailand plans to cut off electricity to several border towns leased to Chinese businesses that are allegedly operating as centers for online scams, many targeting Chinese citizens. These compounds, reportedly employing forced labor, are linked to various illegal activities including gambling, cryptocurrency fraud, and human trafficking. This action follows pressure from the Chinese government to crack down on these operations and aims to disrupt these illicit businesses.

  The Kingdom of Thailand, in a demonstrably assertive move against illicit activities operating within its borders and impacting its international reputation, is poised to implement a significant disruption strategy targeting fraudulent operations, specifically those located in border towns adjacent to Myanmar. These operations, frequently characterized as "scam hubs" or "boiler rooms," are reportedly engaged in a multitude of deceptive practices, including online scams and various forms of cybercrime, often targeting individuals internationally. These illicit enterprises are believed to be largely staffed by individuals trafficked from neighboring countries, particularly Myanmar, who are coerced into participating in these criminal activities.

  The Thai government's planned intervention involves the drastic measure of severing electricity supply to these identified scam centers. This tactical maneuver is intended to cripple the operational capacity of these illegal businesses, which rely heavily on uninterrupted power for their computer systems, internet connectivity, and general functioning. This decisive action reflects a heightened commitment by Thai authorities to address the growing concern over these criminal enterprises, which have not only brought negative attention to the region but have also contributed to the exploitation and suffering of vulnerable populations. By targeting the essential infrastructure that supports these illicit activities, the Thai government aims to dismantle these operations effectively and send a clear message of intolerance towards such criminal endeavors within its jurisdiction. The implications of this action extend beyond mere disruption; the move signals a broader effort to combat human trafficking and transnational crime, contributing to regional stability and security. This strategy also carries the potential to improve Thailand's standing in the international community, which has been increasingly scrutinizing the nation's role in addressing these complex cross-border criminal networks.

  • Thailand
  • Myanmar
  • Scams
  • cybercrime
  • crime
  • Electricity
  • power outage
  • Border Disputes
  • international relations
  • Southeast Asia
  • Politics

  Summary of Comments ( 34 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43146155

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters are skeptical that cutting power will significantly impact the scam operations. Several suggest the scammers will simply use generators, highlighting the profitability of these operations and their willingness to invest in maintaining them. Others question the Thai government's true motivation, speculating about corruption and potential kickbacks from allowing the scams to continue. Some discuss the broader geopolitical context, mentioning the coup and the difficulty of exerting influence over the border regions. A few comments also delve into the technical aspects, discussing the feasibility of cutting power selectively and the potential for collateral damage to legitimate businesses and residents. The overall sentiment is one of doubt regarding the effectiveness of this measure and cynicism towards the Thai government's declared intentions.

  The Hacker News post titled "Thailand to Cut Power to Myanmar Scam Hubs" has generated several comments discussing the complexities of the situation and the potential ramifications of Thailand's actions.

  Several commenters express skepticism about the effectiveness of cutting off power. One points out the likelihood of scammers having backup generators, questioning the long-term impact of the power cuts. Another highlights the logistical difficulties of selectively cutting power to specific buildings in border towns, suggesting that legitimate businesses and residents might also be affected. This leads to a discussion about the potential for collateral damage and the ethical implications of such a broad action.

  Some commenters delve into the political dynamics at play, mentioning the current state of affairs within Myanmar and the relationship between Thailand and its neighboring countries. One commenter speculates that the move might be more about political posturing than a genuine attempt to curb scams, suggesting it's a way for Thailand to demonstrate action without addressing the root causes of the problem.

  The discussion also touches upon the nature of the scams themselves and the vulnerability of the people involved. One commenter questions whether the scammers are truly forced into these activities or if they're willing participants. Another raises concerns about the victims of these scams and whether cutting off power will actually help them.

  A few commenters offer alternative solutions, such as focusing on financial institutions that facilitate the movement of illicit funds. They argue that targeting the money flow would be more effective than disrupting operations through power cuts. The idea of international cooperation to tackle the issue is also raised, emphasizing the need for a coordinated effort to address the problem effectively.

  Overall, the comments reflect a nuanced understanding of the situation, acknowledging the complexities and challenges involved. There's a general sentiment of doubt regarding the effectiveness of the proposed power cuts, with many commenters suggesting that more comprehensive and targeted strategies are needed to address the root causes of the scams and protect vulnerable populations.

• How to lose a fortune with one bad click

  permalink

  Posted: 2024-12-18 13:21:14

  Verbose tl;dr

  Brian Krebs's post details how a single misplaced click cost one cryptocurrency investor over $600,000. The victim, identified as "Nick," was attempting to connect his Ledger hardware wallet to what he thought was the official PancakeSwap decentralized exchange. Instead, he clicked a malicious Google ad that led to a phishing site mimicking PancakeSwap. After entering his seed phrase, hackers drained his wallet of various cryptocurrencies. The incident highlights the dangers of blindly trusting search results, especially when dealing with valuable assets. It emphasizes the importance of verifying website URLs and exercising extreme caution before entering sensitive information like seed phrases, as one wrong click can have devastating financial consequences.

  Brian Krebs, in his blog post "How to Lose a Fortune with Just One Bad Click," meticulously details the alarmingly simple methods employed by cybercriminals to pilfer vast sums of cryptocurrency from unsuspecting victims. He elucidates a prevalent tactic involving the compromise of legitimate websites, particularly those frequented by individuals active in the cryptocurrency space. These compromised platforms are then surreptitiously weaponized to inject malicious JavaScript code into web pages, lying dormant until a specific, high-value target visits. This targeted approach, known as a "watering hole attack," maximizes the potential for a significant financial windfall.

  Krebs painstakingly describes how this injected JavaScript functions, often disguised as seemingly innocuous elements like a browser update prompt or an enticing advertisement. Upon the target's interaction with this malicious element, a deceptive prompt mimicking the user's cryptocurrency wallet interface appears. This meticulously crafted counterfeit interface is designed to capture the victim's sensitive login credentials, including private keys or seed phrases, which are immediately transmitted to the attackers. With these cryptographic keys in their possession, the criminals gain complete control over the victim's cryptocurrency holdings, enabling them to rapidly and surreptitiously transfer the funds to their own wallets. The entire process, from the initial click on the malicious element to the complete depletion of the victim's funds, can occur within a matter of seconds, leaving the victim bewildered and financially devastated.

  The author further elaborates on the sophisticated techniques used by these malicious actors to evade detection, including employing legitimate web hosting services and obfuscating their malicious code. He also highlights the increasing prevalence of this type of attack, specifically targeting prominent figures and organizations within the cryptocurrency ecosystem due to their potentially substantial holdings. Krebs underscores the importance of exercising extreme caution when interacting with any website, particularly those related to cryptocurrency, and advocates for the adoption of robust security practices such as using hardware wallets and employing strong, unique passwords for each online service. He further emphasizes the critical need to be highly skeptical of any unexpected prompts or pop-ups, particularly those requesting sensitive information like cryptocurrency wallet credentials, as these are often telltale signs of a phishing attempt. The article serves as a stark reminder of the ever-present risks in the digital realm and the devastating consequences that can result from a single, ill-fated click.

  • Cybersecurity
  • Phishing
  • Scams
  • social engineering
  • Online Security
  • Fraud
  • Malware
  • Security Awareness
  • Financial Loss
  • internet safety
  • cybercrime
  • Security Threats
  • Clickjacking
  • One-Click Fraud
  • Pig Butchering
  • Investment Scams
  • Romance Scams

  Summary of Comments ( 368 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42450221

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters largely agreed with the article's premise about the devastating impact of phishing attacks, especially targeting high-net-worth individuals. Some pointed out the increasing sophistication of these attacks, making them harder to detect even for tech-savvy users. Several users discussed the importance of robust security practices, including using hardware security keys, strong passwords, and skepticism towards unexpected communications. The effectiveness of educating users about phishing tactics was debated, with some suggesting that technical solutions like mandatory 2FA are more reliable than relying on user vigilance. A few commenters shared personal anecdotes or experiences with similar scams, highlighting the real-world consequences and emotional distress these attacks can cause. The overall sentiment was one of caution and a recognition that even the most careful individuals can fall victim to well-crafted phishing attempts.

  The Hacker News post "How to lose a fortune with one bad click" (linking to a KrebsOnSecurity article about a SIM swapping attack) has generated a number of comments discussing various aspects of security and the victim's responsibility.

  Several commenters express sympathy for the victim, acknowledging the sophistication of these attacks and the difficulty in defending against them. They point out that even technically savvy individuals can fall prey to such scams, especially given the increasing complexity of online security and the reliance on third-party services. One commenter highlights the psychological manipulation employed by scammers, creating a sense of urgency and exploiting human vulnerabilities.

  A recurring theme is the inadequacy of two-factor authentication (2FA) using SMS messages. Many commenters emphasize the inherent insecurity of SMS-based 2FA, and advocate for stronger alternatives like hardware security keys or authenticator apps. The discussion also touches upon the limitations of SIM swap protection offered by mobile carriers, and the often cumbersome processes involved in recovering from such attacks.

  Some commenters delve into the technical details of the attack, speculating about the specific methods used by the perpetrators to gain control of the victim's accounts. They discuss the possibility of vulnerabilities within the cryptocurrency exchange or the victim's email provider, and the potential role of social engineering in the attack.

  Several comments focus on the importance of education and awareness. They suggest resources and best practices for improving online security, such as using strong, unique passwords, enabling multi-factor authentication wherever possible, and being wary of phishing attempts.

  A few commenters express a more critical perspective, questioning the victim's level of due diligence and suggesting that a certain degree of personal responsibility is necessary for safeguarding one's assets. However, these comments are generally countered by others who emphasize the increasing sophistication of scams and the difficulty in staying ahead of evolving threats.

  The conversation also touches upon the broader issue of cybersecurity and the need for stronger regulations and better protection for consumers. Some commenters call for increased accountability for mobile carriers and other service providers, while others advocate for improved security measures within the cryptocurrency industry.