The CERN article is a humorous April Fool's Day piece. It satirically reports the "discovery" of quantum entanglement between sheep, attributing their flocking behavior to this quantum phenomenon. The article uses pseudo-scientific jargon and fabricated quotes to maintain the joke, while subtly referencing real physics concepts like Bell's inequality and quantum superposition. Ultimately, the article's purpose is lighthearted entertainment, not a genuine scientific announcement.
The article "A bestiary of exotic hadrons" explores the burgeoning field of exotic hadron discoveries. Beyond the conventional meson and baryon structures, physicists are increasingly finding particles with more complex quark configurations, such as tetraquarks and pentaquarks. These discoveries, facilitated by experiments like LHCb, are challenging existing quark models and prompting the development of new theoretical frameworks to explain these exotic particles' structures, properties, and their roles within the broader landscape of quantum chromodynamics. The article highlights specific examples of newly observed exotic hadrons and discusses the ongoing debates surrounding their interpretations, emphasizing the vibrant and evolving nature of hadron spectroscopy.
HN commenters generally express fascination with the complexity and strangeness of exotic hadrons. Some discuss the challenges in detecting and classifying these particles, highlighting the statistical nature of the process and the difficulty in distinguishing true signals from background noise. A few commenters dive deeper into the theoretical aspects, mentioning QCD, quark confinement, and the potential for future discoveries. Others draw parallels to other scientific fields like biology, marveling at the "zoo" of particles and the constant evolution of our understanding. Several express appreciation for the clear and accessible writing of the CERN Courier article, making the complex topic understandable to a wider audience. One commenter questions the practical applications of this research, prompting a discussion about the fundamental nature of scientific inquiry and its unpredictable long-term benefits.
Summary of Comments ( 15 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43545349
Hacker News users expressed significant skepticism about the linked article claiming quantum entanglement in sheep. Several commenters pointed out that the study measured correlations in sheep physiology, which could easily be explained by classical physics, like shared environmental factors. They argued that the article misrepresents or misunderstands the concept of quantum entanglement, and there's no evidence presented to suggest anything beyond classical correlations. Some users criticized the sensationalist headline and the poor quality of science reporting in general. A few commenters questioned the journal's credibility and the peer review process. Overall, the consensus was that the claim of quantum entanglement in sheep is unsubstantiated.
The Hacker News post titled "CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43545349) has elicited several comments expressing skepticism and amusement, with a general theme of disbelief and playful mockery of the premise. No one appears to be taking the linked article seriously.
Several commenters immediately point out that the article is a joke, published on April 1st (April Fool's Day). They express a mixture of amusement and mild annoyance at having fallen for the prank, or at seeing it posted seriously.
One commenter sarcastically questions the methodology of the "study," asking about the control group of sheep not entangled and how they determined the baseline for "sheepness." This further emphasizes the perceived absurdity of the premise.
Another commenter humorously suggests a link to the concept of "sheeple," a derogatory term for people who are easily influenced and follow the crowd, implying that the article's joke plays on this existing concept.
Some comments express disappointment at the article being a joke, indicating they were genuinely intrigued by the title's seemingly groundbreaking claim. This highlights the surprising nature of the headline and its potential to pique interest even if ultimately false.
A few commenters engage in playful banter, continuing the joke by referencing other absurd hypothetical scenarios involving quantum mechanics and animals, such as Schrödinger's cat being entangled with a dog. This adds to the overall lighthearted and humorous tone of the comment section.
In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post overwhelmingly recognize the linked article as an April Fool's Day prank. They respond with a mixture of amusement, skepticism, and playful mockery, highlighting the absurdity of the premise and engaging in lighthearted jokes related to the concept of quantum entanglement and animals.