Stories with Tag data control

• Open source and self hostable/private file converter

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-12 12:40:13

  Verbose tl;dr

  Vert.sh is an open-source, self-hostable file conversion service. It leverages LibreOffice in the backend to handle a wide array of document, image, and presentation formats. Users can easily deploy Vert.sh using Docker and configure it to their specific needs, maintaining complete control over their data privacy. The project aims to provide a robust and versatile alternative to cloud-based conversion tools for individuals and organizations concerned about data security and vendor lock-in.

  The Vert.sh project introduces a versatile, open-source file conversion solution designed for self-hosting and private use. This locally-operated system eliminates reliance on external cloud services, ensuring data privacy and security. Vert.sh leverages the power of LibreOffice in the background, providing robust support for a wide array of document, spreadsheet, presentation, and image formats. This means users can convert files like DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, ODT, ODS, ODP, and various image types without transmitting sensitive information over the internet. The system is built with user-friendliness in mind, offering a straightforward command-line interface for direct interaction and an API for integration with other applications or workflows. Furthermore, Vert.sh is packaged as a Docker container, simplifying deployment and ensuring portability across different systems. This containerized approach streamlines installation and management, allowing users to quickly set up and maintain their private file conversion server. The project emphasizes its commitment to remaining open-source, providing transparency and allowing community contributions for ongoing improvement and expansion of its capabilities. In essence, Vert.sh empowers users to reclaim control over their file conversions, offering a secure, flexible, and locally-managed alternative to cloud-based services.

  • file conversion
  • file converter
  • Open Source
  • self-hosted
  • private
  • document conversion
  • cloud alternative
  • privacy
  • Security
  • data control
  • web application
  • online converter
  • local hosting
  • on-premise
  • offline converter

  Summary of Comments ( 66 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43663865

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users generally expressed enthusiasm for the open-source, self-hostable file converter Vert.sh, praising its simplicity and potential usefulness. Several commenters highlighted the benefit of avoiding uploads to third-party services for privacy and security reasons, with some mentioning specific use cases like converting ebooks. A few users questioned the project's long-term viability and maintainability given the potential complexity of handling numerous file formats and dependencies. Some also suggested alternative self-hosted solutions like Pandoc and Soffice/LibreOffice. The discussion also touched on the challenges of sandboxing potentially malicious files uploaded for conversion, with some proposing using Docker or virtual machines for enhanced security.

  The Hacker News post discussing the open-source, self-hostable file converter Vert.sh generated a moderate amount of discussion, with several commenters expressing interest in the project and exploring its potential use cases and limitations.

  Several users appreciated the simplicity and self-hostable nature of Vert.sh. One commenter highlighted the advantage of using a tool like this for sensitive data, avoiding the privacy concerns associated with uploading files to third-party online converters. Another user mentioned their existing use of Pandoc for similar conversion tasks but expressed interest in exploring Vert.sh due to its potentially streamlined interface and focus on web-based conversion. The self-hosting aspect was repeatedly praised, allowing users to maintain control over their data and avoid potential costs associated with cloud-based services.

  Some commenters discussed the technical aspects of Vert.sh. One pointed out that the project relies on LibreOffice running in the background, suggesting that users would need to have it installed and functioning correctly. This sparked a brief discussion about the resource requirements of running LibreOffice and its potential impact on performance, especially for complex conversions. Another user inquired about the possibility of containerizing Vert.sh for easier deployment and management, which another user confirmed was possible through the provided Dockerfile.

  The limitations of relying on LibreOffice were also brought up. One user questioned the efficiency of using LibreOffice for simple conversions like Markdown to HTML, suggesting that a dedicated tool might be faster. Another commenter mentioned potential issues with font handling in LibreOffice, which could affect the fidelity of converted documents.

  Finally, the discussion touched upon alternative solutions and potential improvements. One user suggested using specialized tools for specific conversion tasks, pointing out the superior performance and quality compared to a general-purpose solution like LibreOffice. Others expressed interest in features like batch conversion and direct integration with cloud storage services. While acknowledging the current limitations, several commenters expressed optimism about the project's future development and potential to become a valuable tool for privacy-conscious users.

• Owning my own data, part 1: Integrating a self-hosted calendar solution

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-10 12:59:54

  Verbose tl;dr

  Frustrated with the limitations and privacy concerns of mainstream calendar services, the author embarked on a journey to self-host their calendar data. They chose Radicale as their CalDAV server due to its simplicity and compatibility, and Thunderbird with the TbSync add-on as their client. The process involved setting up Radicale, configuring Thunderbird to connect securely, and migrating existing calendar data. While acknowledging potential challenges like maintaining the server and ensuring data backups, the author emphasizes the benefits of owning their data and controlling access to it. This shift empowers them to choose their preferred software and avoid the potential pitfalls of vendor lock-in and privacy compromises associated with commercial calendar platforms.

  Emily Gorcenski, in her blog post "Owning my own data, part 1: Integrating a self-hosted calendar solution," details her journey and rationale behind migrating her calendar data from Google Calendar to a self-hosted solution utilizing Radicale, a CalDAV server. Motivated by a desire for greater control over her personal information and a reduction in reliance on large tech companies, she outlines the benefits and challenges she encountered throughout the process.

  The author begins by articulating her privacy concerns regarding data collection practices of major tech corporations. She emphasizes the inherent risks associated with entrusting sensitive personal information, such as scheduling details, to third-party platforms. This concern drives her exploration and eventual adoption of a self-hosted calendar system.

  Gorcenski then meticulously describes her chosen technical stack, which centers around Radicale, a lightweight and easily deployable CalDAV server. She explains her decision to utilize Docker for containerization, simplifying the installation and maintenance of Radicale on her server. Furthermore, she details the integration of her new calendar setup with various client applications across multiple devices, including her desktop computer, laptop, and mobile phone. This includes discussions on configuring CalDAV clients like Thunderbird's Lightning extension and the challenges of finding a suitable Android client that supports the CalDAV protocol effectively. She also touches upon the complexity of syncing calendar data between devices and ensuring data consistency across platforms.

  The post further elaborates on the intricacies of setting up SSL certificates using Certbot, highlighting the importance of secure connections for protecting sensitive calendar information. She walks through the steps of configuring her web server (Nginx) as a reverse proxy for Radicale, enhancing security and providing a standardized access point.

  Finally, Gorcenski concludes by reflecting on the initial successes and ongoing challenges of self-hosting her calendar. She acknowledges the learning curve associated with managing her own server infrastructure, but emphasizes the rewarding sense of ownership and control over her personal data. The post hints at future installments in the "Owning my own data" series, suggesting further explorations into self-hosting other personal data management solutions. She underscores the importance of data privacy and encourages others to consider taking control of their own digital information.

  • self-hosting
  • calendar
  • data ownership
  • privacy
  • digital sovereignty
  • calendar server
  • data control
  • personal data
  • data management
  • online privacy
  • Technology

  Summary of Comments ( 48 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43643343

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters generally praised the author's approach to self-hosting a calendar, emphasizing the importance of data ownership and control. Some questioned the complexity and effort involved, suggesting simpler alternatives like using a privacy-focused calendar provider. A few pointed out potential downsides of self-hosting, including maintenance overhead and the risk of data loss. The discussion also touched on the trade-offs between convenience and control when choosing between self-hosting and third-party services, with some arguing that the benefits of self-hosting outweigh the added complexity. Several commenters shared their own experiences and recommended specific tools and services for self-hosting calendars and other personal data. There was a brief discussion on CalDAV and its limitations, along with alternative protocols.

  The Hacker News post discussing self-hosting a calendar solution has generated several comments, primarily focusing on the practicality, security, and complexity of such an endeavor.

  Some users express skepticism about the true ownership of data, even when self-hosting. They point out that reliance on third-party hardware and software components still introduces potential vulnerabilities and external dependencies. The discussion delves into the nuances of data ownership, acknowledging that complete control is difficult to achieve in the interconnected digital world.

  A recurring theme is the trade-off between convenience and control. While self-hosting offers greater control over data, it often comes at the cost of increased complexity and maintenance. Commenters discuss the technical expertise required to set up and maintain a self-hosted calendar solution, highlighting the challenges of ensuring reliability, security, and accessibility. Several users suggest that for many individuals, the benefits of convenience offered by established calendar services outweigh the potential advantages of self-hosting.

  The discussion also touches upon the importance of data backups and disaster recovery planning. Users emphasize the need for robust backup strategies to mitigate the risk of data loss in a self-hosted environment. The conversation highlights the responsibility that comes with self-hosting, as users become solely responsible for the security and integrity of their data.

  Several commenters share their personal experiences with self-hosting calendars, offering insights into the challenges and rewards. Some users express satisfaction with their self-hosted setups, emphasizing the benefits of increased privacy and control. Others recount difficulties encountered during the setup and maintenance process, cautioning against undertaking such projects without sufficient technical expertise.

  Finally, there's a thread discussing alternative approaches to data ownership and privacy, such as utilizing encrypted calendar services or employing privacy-focused email providers. The discussion explores the spectrum of options available to users concerned about data privacy, recognizing that self-hosting is not a one-size-fits-all solution.