OpenVertebrate has launched a free, accessible database containing over 13,000 3D scans of vertebrate specimens, including skeletons and soft tissue. Sourced from museums and research institutions worldwide, these scans allow researchers, educators, and the public to explore vertebrate anatomy and evolution in detail. The project aims to democratize access to these resources, enabling new discoveries and educational opportunities without requiring physical access to the specimens themselves. Users can download, 3D print, or view the models online using a dedicated viewer.
"Globe Gores" explores the challenge of representing a spherical Earth on a flat map. The blog post focuses on globe gores, which are the individual, often lens-shaped, segments printed and then meticulously applied to a sphere to create a globe. It highlights the distortions inherent in flattening these gores for printing, referencing various historical gore patterns and explaining how their shapes attempt to minimize these distortions. The post showcases examples from the Library of Congress's collection, emphasizing the craftsmanship and precision required to create these essential components of historical globes.
HN users discuss the practical aspects of creating globes from gores, touching on the distortions inherent in representing a 3D sphere on a 2D surface. Some commenters delve into the history of globe-making and the different projections used, while others suggest software and techniques for generating gore patterns, including open-source options like QGIS and G.Projector. A few express fascination with the intricate geometry involved, and some share personal anecdotes about building their own globes. The challenges of aligning and assembling the gores are also highlighted, with tips offered for achieving a smooth, accurate final product. Several users appreciate the Library of Congress's detailed blog post, finding it informative and inspiring.
Summary of Comments ( 12 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43589989
HN commenters generally expressed enthusiasm for the OpenVertebrate project, viewing it as a valuable resource for research, education, and art. Some highlighted the potential for 3D printing and its implications for paleontology and museum studies, allowing access to specimens without handling fragile originals. Others discussed the technical aspects, inquiring about file formats and the scanning process. A few expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of such projects and the need for consistent funding and metadata standards. Several pointed out the utility for comparative anatomy and evolutionary biology studies. Finally, some users shared links to related projects and resources involving 3D scanning of biological specimens.
The Hacker News post titled "OpenVertebrate Presents a Database of 13,000 3D Scans of Specimens" has generated several comments discussing the significance and potential applications of the database.
Several commenters express enthusiasm for the resource. One highlights the potential for 3D printing, envisioning the possibility of printing and assembling a complete skeleton, while acknowledging potential licensing issues. Another user points out the educational value, particularly for those in remote areas or without access to physical specimens. The ability to manipulate and examine the models in 3D is seen as a significant advantage over traditional 2D images.
Some comments focus on the technical aspects. One user questions the accessibility of the data for those with limited internet access, given the large file sizes. Another inquires about the scanning methodology and file formats used. A commenter with experience in the field points out that the quality of 3D scans can vary significantly and suggests that the database would benefit from including metadata about scan quality. This same commenter expresses excitement about the potential to use the database for geometric morphometrics, a powerful technique for analyzing shape variation.
There's a discussion about potential applications beyond education and research. One commenter suggests uses in art and design, while another envisions applications in paleontology and comparative anatomy. The possibility of using the models for virtual and augmented reality experiences is also mentioned.
Finally, a few comments raise important considerations about the ethical implications of digitizing natural history collections, including issues of cultural heritage and repatriation. One commenter raises the point that many of these specimens were likely collected during periods of colonialism and emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the historical context.
Overall, the comments reflect a positive reception to the OpenVertebrate database, with commenters recognizing its potential to revolutionize fields like education, research, and even art and design. However, the discussion also highlights crucial considerations regarding data accessibility, quality, and the ethical implications of digitizing natural history collections.