Frustrated with PG&E and inspired by a neighbor, the author detailed their journey of building a DIY off-grid solar power system. They meticulously researched components like solar panels, charge controllers, batteries, and inverters, prioritizing affordability and efficiency. The process involved learning about electricity, overcoming permitting hurdles, and hands-on installation. Ultimately, the project was successful, providing power independence and significant cost savings compared to grid reliance, despite some initial challenges and unexpected expenses. The author emphasized the empowering nature of the experience and encouraged others to consider similar projects.
Collapse OS is a minimal, highly adaptable operating system designed for a post-apocalyptic scenario where global supply chains have broken down. It aims to be runnable on minimal and easily scavenged hardware, using widely available Z80 processors. Its functionality focuses on essential tasks like bootstrapping other, more complex systems, creating and running simple programs, and interfacing with rudimentary hardware like text terminals and floppy drives. The project anticipates a future where readily available modern hardware and software are no longer accessible, and seeks to provide a digital life raft by relying on robust, easily reproduced technologies.
Hacker News users discussing Collapse OS express skepticism about its practicality and usefulness. Many question the likelihood of a societal collapse severe enough to render existing technology useless, while others point out the difficulty of bootstrapping complex technology from salvaged parts in a post-apocalyptic scenario. Some find the project interesting as a thought experiment or a hobby, but doubt its real-world applicability. A few commenters express concerns about the project's potential to attract a "doomer" mentality. The overall sentiment is one of cautious curiosity mixed with significant doubt about the project's premise and viability.
Summary of Comments ( 206 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44023226
HN commenters largely agree with the author's frustration with PG&E and the desire for energy independence. Some question the long-term cost-effectiveness of the project, citing potential maintenance costs and the lifespan of batteries. Others point out the complexities of grid-tied systems and permitting processes. Several users share their own positive experiences with solar, offering advice on battery choices and system design. One commenter suggests exploring community solar as a less complex alternative. Another raises the issue of the environmental impact of battery production, urging consideration of the full lifecycle cost. Several users advocate for improved regulation and competition in the energy sector.
The Hacker News post titled "Building my own solar power system," linking to a Medium article about a homeowner's experience with building a solar power system, generated a moderate number of comments discussing various aspects of DIY solar and the author's experience.
Several commenters focused on the financial aspects of the project. Some questioned the author's calculations and suggested that the payback period might be longer than anticipated, especially when factoring in the value of the author's time. Others debated the wisdom of DIY solar versus hiring a professional installer, considering factors like warranties, permitting, and potential safety issues.
One compelling thread discussed the complexities of battery systems and the potential for degradation over time. Commenters shared their experiences with different battery chemistries and emphasized the importance of proper sizing and management for long-term performance.
Another thread focused on the regulatory hurdles and permitting processes involved in DIY solar installations. Commenters highlighted variations in regulations across different jurisdictions and offered advice on navigating these complexities.
A few commenters shared their own positive experiences with DIY solar, emphasizing the satisfaction of self-sufficiency and the potential for cost savings. They also offered practical tips and resources for those considering similar projects.
Some commenters questioned the author's characterization of PG&E, arguing that generalizing based on individual experiences might not be accurate. They also discussed the broader challenges of grid management and the role of utilities in the transition to renewable energy.
Finally, a couple of commenters expressed skepticism about the author's technical expertise and raised concerns about the safety of DIY electrical work. They stressed the importance of adhering to code requirements and seeking professional guidance when necessary.
Overall, the comments section provided a diverse range of perspectives on the practicality, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory aspects of DIY solar installations, offering valuable insights for anyone considering embarking on a similar project.