Japan Post has launched a free "digital address" system assigning a unique 13-digit code to every location in Japan, including individual apartments and building floors. This system aims to simplify deliveries and other location-based services, especially in areas with complex or non-standard addresses. Users can obtain their digital address via a website or app, and businesses can integrate the system into their services. The goal is to improve logistics efficiency and potentially support autonomous delivery robots and drones in the future.
Researchers have developed a method to generate sound directly from OLED displays, eliminating the need for traditional speakers. By vibrating specific areas of the display panel, they create audible sound waves. This technology allows for thinner devices, multi-channel audio output (like surround sound), and potentially invisible, integrated speakers within the screen itself. The approach utilizes the inherent flexibility and responsiveness of OLED materials, making it a promising advancement in audio-visual integration.
Hacker News users discussed the potential applications and limitations of the new OLED-based audio technology. Some expressed excitement about its use in AR/VR headsets, transparent displays, and automotive applications, praising the elimination of bezels and improved immersion. Others were more skeptical, questioning the audio quality compared to traditional speakers, especially regarding bass response and maximum volume. Concerns about cost and longevity were also raised, with some speculating about the potential for burn-in issues similar to those experienced with OLED screens. Several commenters also pointed out the technology's similarity to bone conduction headphones, noting potential advantages in noise isolation and directional audio. Finally, a few users mentioned existing piezo-based solutions for thin displays and wondered how this new technology compared.
The idea that software developers become obsolete quickly is a myth. The post argues this recurring fear is driven by the hype cycle around new technologies, creating a perceived need for developers specializing in the latest trend. However, foundational computer science principles remain relevant, and experienced developers adapt to new tools and languages by leveraging their existing knowledge. While specific skills may become less valuable, the ability to learn and solve problems, the core of software development, remains crucial. This adaptability ensures developers remain valuable throughout their careers, despite the ever-shifting technological landscape.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the article's premise, arguing that developers rarely become obsolete due to new technologies. Several commenters pointed out that learning is a fundamental part of being a developer, and adapting to new languages and frameworks is expected. Some highlighted the enduring value of fundamental computer science principles, regardless of the "hot new thing." A few dissenting opinions suggested that while complete obsolescence is rare, developers can become less competitive if they refuse to adapt or specialize too narrowly. Others cynically noted that the "myth" of obsolescence is often perpetuated by those selling new tools or training, creating a fear-driven market. The discussion also touched upon the importance of specializing in a niche to remain valuable, even as broader technologies shift.
The post "Designing Tools for Scientific Thought" explores the potential of software tools to augment scientific thinking, moving beyond mere data analysis. It argues that current tools primarily focus on managing and visualizing data, neglecting the crucial aspects of idea generation, hypothesis formation, and argument construction. The author proposes a new class of "thought tools" that would actively participate in the scientific process by facilitating structured thinking, enabling complex model building, and providing mechanisms for rigorous testing and refinement of hypotheses. This involves representing scientific knowledge as interconnected concepts and allowing researchers to manipulate and explore these relationships interactively, potentially leading to new insights and discoveries. Ultimately, the goal is to create a dynamic, computational environment that amplifies human intellect and accelerates the pace of scientific progress.
Several Hacker News commenters appreciated the essay's exploration of tools for thought, particularly its focus on the limitations of existing tools and the need for new paradigms. Some highlighted the difficulty of representing complex, interconnected ideas in current digital environments, suggesting improvements like better graph databases and more flexible visualization tools. Others emphasized the importance of capturing the evolution of thought processes, advocating for version control systems for ideas. The discussion also touched on the potential of AI in augmenting scientific thought, with some expressing excitement while others cautioned against overreliance on these technologies. A few users questioned the framing of scientific thought as a purely computational process, arguing for the importance of intuition and non-linear thinking. Finally, several commenters shared their own experiences and preferred tools for managing and developing ideas, mentioning options like Roam Research, Obsidian, and Zotero.
Researchers at the University of Arizona have developed a phototransistor capable of operating at petahertz speeds under ambient conditions. This breakthrough utilizes a unique semimetal material and a novel design exploiting light-matter interactions to achieve unprecedented switching speeds. This advancement could revolutionize electronics, enabling significantly faster computing and communication technologies in the future.
Hacker News users discuss the potential impact and feasibility of a petahertz transistor. Some express skepticism about the claims, questioning if the device truly functions as a transistor and highlighting the difference between demonstrating light modulation at petahertz frequencies and creating a usable electronic switch. Others discuss the challenges of integrating such a device into existing technology, citing the need for equally fast supporting components and the difficulty of generating and controlling signals at these frequencies. Despite the skepticism, there's general excitement about the potential of such a breakthrough, with discussions ranging from potential applications in communication and computing to its implications for fundamental scientific research. Some users also point out the ambiguity around "ambient conditions," speculating about the true operating environment. Finally, a few comments provide further context by linking to related research and patents.
The blog post "Reinvent the Wheel" argues that reinventing the wheel, specifically in software development, can be a valuable learning experience, especially for beginners. While using existing libraries is often more efficient for production, building things from scratch provides a deeper understanding of fundamental concepts and underlying mechanisms. This hands-on approach can lead to stronger problem-solving skills and the ability to create more customized and potentially innovative solutions in the future, even if the initial creation isn't as polished or efficient. The author emphasizes that this practice should be done intentionally for educational purposes, not in professional settings where established solutions are readily available.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's premise that reinventing the wheel can be beneficial for learning and deeper understanding, particularly for foundational concepts. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of times they reimplemented existing tools, leading to valuable insights and a greater appreciation for the complexities involved. Some cautioned against always reinventing the wheel, especially in production environments where reliability and efficiency are crucial. The discussion also touched upon the importance of knowing when to reinvent – for educational purposes or when existing solutions don't quite fit the specific needs of a project. A few users pointed out the distinction between reinventing for learning versus reinventing in a professional context, highlighting the need for pragmatism in the latter.
Researchers have developed contact lenses embedded with graphene photodetectors that enable a rudimentary form of vision in darkness. These lenses detect a broader spectrum of light, including infrared, which is invisible to the naked eye. While not providing full "sight" in the traditional sense, the lenses register light differences and translate them into perceivable signals, potentially allowing wearers to detect shapes and movement in low-light or no-light conditions. The technology is still in its early stages, demonstrating proof-of-concept rather than a refined, practical application.
Hacker News users expressed skepticism about the "seeing in the dark" claim, pointing out that the contacts amplify existing light rather than enabling true night vision. Several commenters questioned the practicality and safety of the technology, citing potential eye damage from infrared lasers and the limited field of view. Some discussed the distinction between active and passive infrared systems, and the potential military applications of similar technology. Others noted the low resolution and grainy images produced, suggesting its usefulness is currently limited. The overall sentiment leaned toward cautious interest with a dose of pragmatism.
Modvion is showcasing their construction of the world's tallest wooden wind turbine tower. Standing at 150 meters, this laminated veneer lumber (LVL) tower surpasses previous height records for wooden turbine towers and demonstrates the viability of using wood as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to steel in wind energy infrastructure. This innovation allows for taller, more efficient turbines, potentially increasing energy production while reducing carbon emissions associated with manufacturing and transportation.
Hacker News commenters discuss the viability and implications of Modvion's tall wooden wind turbine towers. Several express skepticism about the longevity of wood in such a demanding application, raising concerns about rot, insect damage, and fire risk, despite the company's claims of treatment and durability. Others question the overall environmental benefit considering the resources required for treatment and maintenance. Some commenters see potential advantages, citing wood's renewability and lighter weight compared to steel, which could simplify transport and installation, particularly in remote locations. The discussion also touches on the potential for local sourcing of wood, boosting regional economies, and the aesthetic appeal of wooden towers compared to steel. A few users call for more data on lifecycle analysis and cost comparisons to properly assess the technology's true impact.
InventWood, a company spun out of the University of Maryland, is preparing to mass-produce a densified wood product that boasts strength comparable to steel and alloys like titanium, while being significantly lighter. Their process removes lignin, compresses the wood, and then chemically treats it for durability. This engineered wood is aimed at replacing traditional materials in various applications like cars, airplanes, and consumer electronics, offering a sustainable and high-performance alternative. InventWood has secured $20 million in funding and plans to open its first factory later this year, scaling production to meet anticipated demand.
Hacker News commenters express significant skepticism regarding InventWood's claims of producing wood stronger than steel, particularly at scale. Several point out the lack of publicly available data and peer-reviewed studies to substantiate such extraordinary claims. The discussion highlights the difference between ultimate tensile strength and specific strength (strength relative to density), questioning whether the comparison to steel is even relevant given likely density differences. Commenters also raise concerns about the environmental impact of the process, the long-term durability of the modified wood, and the actual cost compared to existing materials. Some suggest the technology may have niche applications but are doubtful about widespread replacement of steel. Several users call for more transparency and data before accepting the claims as credible.
The author experimented with coding solely on AR glasses and a Linux environment running on their Android phone for two weeks. They used Nreal Air glasses for display, a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and Termux to access a Debian Linux environment on their phone. While acknowledging the setup's limitations like narrow field of view, software quirks, and occasional performance issues, they found the experience surprisingly usable for tasks like web development and sysadmin work. The portability and always-available nature of this mobile coding setup proved appealing, offering a glimpse into a potential future of computing. Despite the current drawbacks, the author believes this kind of mobile, glasses-based setup holds promise for becoming a genuinely productive work environment.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed skepticism about the practicality of the setup described in the article. Several pointed out the limitations of current AR glasses, including battery life, field of view, and input methods. Some questioned the real-world benefits over existing solutions like a lightweight laptop or tablet, particularly given the added complexity. Others highlighted the potential for distraction and social awkwardness. A few commenters expressed interest in the concept but acknowledged the technology isn't quite ready for prime time. Some discussed alternative approaches like using VNC or a lightweight desktop environment. The lack of details about the author's actual workflow and the types of tasks performed also drew criticism.
Arm's latest financial results reveal substantial growth, largely attributed to the success of its Armv9 architecture. Increased royalty revenue reflects wider adoption of Armv9 designs in premium smartphones and infrastructure equipment. While licensing revenue slightly declined, the overall positive performance underscores the growing demand for Arm's technology in key markets, especially as Armv9 enables advancements in areas like AI and specialized processing. This success reinforces Arm's strong market position as it prepares for its upcoming IPO.
Hacker News users discuss ARM's financial success, attributing it to the broader trend of increasing compute needs rather than any specific innovation in ARMv9. Several commenters point out that the v9 architecture itself hasn't delivered significant improvements and question its actual impact. Some highlight the licensing model as the key driver of ARM's profitability, with the suggestion that ARM's value lies in its ecosystem and established position rather than groundbreaking technical advancements. A recurring theme is skepticism towards the claimed benefits of ARMv9, with commenters expressing that it feels more like a marketing push than a substantial architectural leap.
A new study suggests remote workers are indeed more likely to launch their own businesses. Researchers found that the rise in remote work during and after the pandemic correlated with a significant increase in new business applications, particularly among those who shifted to working from home. This supports the concerns of some employers that remote work could lead to more employees branching out on their own. The study controlled for various factors, including pre-existing entrepreneurial tendencies and local economic conditions, to isolate the impact of remote work itself.
HN commenters generally agree with the article's premise that remote work facilitates starting a business. Several point out that decreased commute times free up significant time and energy, making side hustles and entrepreneurial pursuits more feasible. Some highlight the reduced risk associated with starting a business while maintaining a stable remote job as a safety net. Others mention the increased exposure to diverse ideas and opportunities online as a contributing factor. A few skeptical comments suggest that correlation doesn't equal causation, proposing alternative explanations like a general increase in entrepreneurial interest or the pandemic's impact on the job market. One commenter notes the potential downsides, like increased competition for existing businesses.
A 1930s German modular cargo bike design by the Aberhart company is being revived by a Berlin-based company called Riese & Müller. Aberhart's ingenious system utilized a standardized chassis that could be adapted to carry various loads using interchangeable modules, including a flatbed, box, tank, or even a passenger carriage. Riese & Müller's Load 75 Rohloff HS doesn't directly copy the Aberhart, but embodies its modularity principle with a sleek, modern design and updated features like electric assist, hydraulic disc brakes, and a continuously variable transmission. This modern take on a pre-war classic offers a glimpse into a potentially more sustainable and adaptable cargo bike future.
Hacker News users generally expressed enthusiasm for the modular cargo bike design, praising its practicality and potential for modern adaptation. Several commenters pointed out the ingenious nature of the original design, highlighting features like the interchangeable modules and compact storage. Some discussed the potential benefits of electric assist and improvements in materials science that could enhance the original concept. A few users brought up the historical context, comparing it to other modular systems of the era and lamenting the loss of such versatile designs. There was also discussion around the challenges of modern manufacturing and regulations, with some skepticism about the feasibility of bringing such a design to market at a reasonable price point.
Professor Martin Elliott, a renowned pediatric heart surgeon, revolutionized complex baby heart surgeries by adapting Formula 1 pitstop strategies. He meticulously analyzed F1 teams, focusing on their seamless coordination, communication, and speed. By implementing these principles, Elliott streamlined his surgical teams, minimizing the crucial time babies spend on bypass machines during intricate procedures, significantly improving survival rates and reducing complications. This involved choreographing roles, standardizing equipment layouts, and practicing extensively for every scenario, mirroring the meticulous preparation and efficiency seen in F1 races.
HN commenters were impressed with Professor Martin Elliott's application of F1 pitstop strategies to pediatric cardiac surgery, leading to significant improvements in surgical times and patient outcomes. Several highlighted the importance of clear communication and checklists in high-pressure environments, drawing parallels between the surgical team and an F1 pit crew. Some questioned the long-term impact on surgeon training and patient selection, expressing concern about the potential for increased pressure and narrower margins of error. Others discussed the broader applicability of these principles to other complex procedures, suggesting potential benefits in fields like trauma surgery and disaster response. One commenter pointed out the article's focus on the "human factors" aspect rather than purely technological advancements.
Bell Labs' success stemmed from a unique combination of factors. Monopoly profits from AT&T provided ample, patient funding, allowing researchers to pursue long-term, fundamental research without immediate commercial pressure. This financial stability fostered a culture of intellectual freedom and collaboration, attracting top talent across diverse disciplines. Management prioritized basic research and tolerated failure, understanding that groundbreaking innovations often arise from unexpected avenues. The resulting environment, coupled with a clear mission tied to improving communication technology, led to a remarkable string of inventions that shaped the modern world.
Hacker News users discuss factors contributing to Bell Labs' success, highlighting management's commitment to long-term fundamental research, a culture of intellectual freedom and collaboration, and the unique historical context of AT&T's regulated monopoly status, which provided stable funding. Some commenters draw parallels to Xerox PARC, noting similar successes hampered by parent companies' inability to capitalize on innovations. Others emphasize the importance of consistent funding, the freedom to pursue curiosity-driven research, and the density of talented individuals, while acknowledging the difficulty of replicating such an environment today. A few comments express skepticism about the "golden age" narrative, pointing to potential downsides of Bell Labs' structure, and suggest that modern research ecosystems, despite their flaws, offer more diverse avenues for innovation. Several users mention the book "The Idea Factory" as a good resource for further understanding Bell Labs' history and success.
The automotive industry is undergoing a massive transformation, shifting from a focus on hardware to software. Car companies are investing billions to develop their own software platforms for features like advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), infotainment, and over-the-air updates, aiming to control the user experience and generate recurring revenue. This represents a significant shift away from relying on third-party software providers and positions car manufacturers to compete directly with tech giants like Apple and Google in the battle for the connected car. This “software-defined vehicle” approach presents both opportunities and challenges, requiring automakers to adapt quickly and potentially consolidate to manage the substantial investment and development complexities.
HN commenters discuss the challenges traditional car manufacturers face transitioning to software-centric businesses. Some argue that car companies underestimate the complexity and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) nature of software development, pointing to Tesla's advantage in this area. Others suggest that established manufacturers might partner with or acquire existing tech companies to bridge the gap. Several comments highlight the cultural shift required, contrasting the slower, hardware-focused mindset of traditional automakers with the agile approach needed for software. The potential for open-source software in automotive and the role of regulations in shaping the future of car software are also touched upon. Finally, some express skepticism about the "billion-dollar software war" framing, suggesting the real challenge is integrating software seamlessly into the overall vehicle design and user experience.
Y Combinator's amicus brief argues that Google's dominance in search and its preferential treatment of its own vertical search services harm competition and innovation, ultimately hurting consumers and startups. They contend that Google leverages its search monopoly to stifle competition in adjacent markets, preventing startups from reaching consumers and diminishing the incentive for innovation. This behavior creates a closed ecosystem that favors Google's own products, even when superior alternatives exist. YC highlights the difficulty startups face in competing against Google's self-preferencing and emphasizes the importance of a competitive search landscape for the continued dynamism of the internet and the broader economy.
HN commenters discuss YC's amicus brief, largely agreeing with its arguments against Google's anti-competitive practices in search. Several highlight the brief's focus on how Google's dominance stifles innovation by controlling distribution and manipulating search results to favor its own vertical search products. Some express skepticism about the government's chances of success, citing the difficulty of proving consumer harm and the power of Google's lobbying efforts. Others see the brief as a strong defense of startup ecosystems and a necessary challenge to Google's monopolistic behavior. The potential impact on AI competition is also mentioned, with concerns about Google leveraging its search dominance to control access to AI models. A few commenters critique specific aspects of the brief or suggest alternative approaches to regulation.
Intel is facing a challenging situation marked by both successes and significant setbacks. While their process technology has fallen behind competitors like TSMC, leading to market share losses and reliance on their own foundries, Intel is demonstrating strength in other areas. Their packaging technology remains competitive, they're seeing growth in their foundry business with government support and external clients, and their upcoming Meteor Lake processor shows promise. Ultimately, Intel's long-term success hinges on regaining process leadership, which will require substantial and sustained investment, as well as flawlessly executing their ambitious roadmap.
Hacker News commenters discuss Intel's complex situation, acknowledging their manufacturing improvements while remaining skeptical of their long-term competitiveness. Several point out that Intel's "wins" are often in areas competitors have abandoned, like low-end server CPUs, or are achieved through aggressive pricing that impacts profitability. Some praise Intel's renewed focus on manufacturing and the potential of their foundry business, but question their ability to compete with TSMC's technological lead, especially in leading-edge nodes. Others highlight the cultural shift at Intel, suggesting a move away from prioritizing stock buybacks towards reinvestment in R&D and manufacturing as a positive sign, but caution that true success remains to be seen. The overall sentiment is one of cautious optimism tempered by the significant challenges Intel faces in regaining its former dominance. Several users also express concern about the US government's heavy subsidies to Intel, viewing it as potentially distorting the market and not necessarily guaranteeing long-term success.
Friction, often seen as a negative, is argued to be the most valuable commodity. It's the resistance that creates value – in products, experiences, and even personal growth. Easy access and seamlessness diminish appreciation and engagement. Intentionally incorporating friction, whether through thoughtful design choices, gated content, or challenging learning curves, can enhance value perception, foster deeper connection, and ultimately lead to greater satisfaction. This "desirable difficulty" forces users to invest more, making the reward feel earned and therefore more meaningful.
HN commenters largely disagree with the article's premise that friction is the most valuable commodity. Several argue that attention is more valuable, as friction is often employed to capture attention. Others suggest that trust, or the reduction of friction to build trust, is more valuable in the long run. Some point out that the article conflates different types of friction, such as the friction of learning a new skill versus the friction of navigating a poorly designed website. A few commenters agree with the author's general point about creating intentional friction for user benefit, but find the framing of "friction as a commodity" to be misleading. Several also critique the examples used in the article, arguing that they demonstrate poor design rather than beneficial friction.
Huawei has launched its first laptop powered by its self-developed HarmonyOS operating system. This move comes as the company's license to use Microsoft Windows has reportedly expired. The new laptop, the Qingyun L410, is aimed at the government and enterprise market, signaling Huawei's continued push to establish its own ecosystem independent of US-originated software.
Hacker News users discuss Huawei's HarmonyOS laptop, expressing skepticism about its viability as a Windows replacement. Several commenters doubt HarmonyOS's compatibility with existing software and question its overall performance. Some suggest the move is forced due to US sanctions, while others speculate about its potential success in the Chinese market. A few users raise concerns about potential security vulnerabilities and backdoors given the Chinese government's influence over Huawei. Overall, the sentiment leans towards cautious pessimism about HarmonyOS's ability to compete with established operating systems outside of China.
Bill Gates announced his intention to drop off the list of the world's richest people by giving virtually all his wealth to the Gates Foundation, accelerating his giving with a $20 billion donation. He believes philanthropy is the best use of his resources and is inspired by the work the foundation is doing to address global health and development challenges. While he'll remain involved with the foundation, he ultimately wants it to be self-sustaining, operating without his personal wealth. This decision is driven by his desire to return his resources to society in ways that have the greatest impact for reducing suffering and improving lives.
Hacker News users discuss Bill Gates' announcement to give away nearly all his wealth to the Gates Foundation. Some express skepticism, questioning the foundation's effectiveness and suggesting it primarily benefits large institutions rather than individuals. Others debate the ethics of billionaires accumulating such vast wealth in the first place, advocating for systemic change instead of philanthropic efforts. Some commenters defend Gates, highlighting the foundation's positive impact on global health, particularly in disease eradication efforts. A few users express concerns about potential unintended consequences of such large-scale philanthropy, while others discuss the complexities of effectively distributing such a large sum of money. There's also discussion around the tax implications of his giving and whether it truly represents a significant personal sacrifice.
Google is investing in three advanced nuclear energy projects through its Google.org philanthropic arm. These projects, developed by TerraPower, X-energy, and Core Power, focus on different next-generation reactor designs, including molten salt, high-temperature gas-cooled, and molten chloride salt reactors. The investment aims to accelerate the development and deployment of these technologies, which offer potential advantages in safety, scalability, and waste reduction compared to traditional nuclear power. Google's contribution will support advanced modeling and simulation capabilities to help bring these designs to market faster and demonstrate their viability as clean energy sources.
Hacker News commenters discuss Google's investment in advanced nuclear projects with a mix of cautious optimism and skepticism. Some express hope that these smaller, modular reactors will prove safer and more efficient than traditional nuclear power. Concerns are raised about the timeline and feasibility of these projects, with some pointing to the history of cost overruns and delays in nuclear energy development. Others question Google's motivations, suggesting it's a PR move or a hedge against future energy needs rather than a genuine belief in the technology. There's also a discussion about the role of government regulation and the need for public acceptance for these projects to succeed. Several comments highlight the potential benefits of nuclear energy for climate change mitigation, while others argue that renewable energy sources offer a faster and more cost-effective solution.
A new mass spectrometry method can identify bacterial and fungal pathogens in clinical samples within minutes, significantly faster than current methods which can take days. Researchers developed a technique that analyzes microbial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by pathogens. This "breathprint" is unique to each species and allows for rapid identification without requiring time-consuming culturing. The technology has been successfully tested on various samples including blood cultures, urine, and swabs, offering potential for quicker diagnosis and treatment of infections.
Hacker News users discussed the potential impact of rapid pathogen identification via mass spectrometry. Some expressed excitement about the speed and cost improvements compared to current methods, particularly for sepsis diagnosis and personalized antibiotic treatment. Others raised concerns, questioning the sensitivity and specificity of the method, particularly its ability to distinguish between closely related species or differentiate colonization from infection. Several commenters also questioned the study's methodology and the generalizability of its findings, particularly regarding the limited number of species tested and the potential difficulties of translating the technique to complex clinical samples like blood. Finally, some users speculated about the potential applications beyond healthcare, such as environmental monitoring and food safety.
Disney Imagineers are defending their new "Project Kiwi" robot depicting a young Walt Disney, emphasizing its potential as a storytelling medium rather than a creepy imitation. They highlight the sophisticated technology behind the robot's lifelike movements and expressions, aiming to create an authentic, engaging experience for park visitors. While acknowledging the uncanny valley effect, they believe the robot's charm and expressiveness outweigh any initial discomfort. The team views Project Kiwi as a step towards a future where animatronic figures can interact more dynamically with guests, enhancing immersion and creating new possibilities for storytelling.
Several Hacker News commenters express skepticism and discomfort with the realistic Walt Disney robot, finding it creepy and bordering on necromancy. Some feel it cheapens Disney's legacy, reducing him to a programmable automaton. Others question the robot's purpose, suggesting it's a shallow attempt to capitalize on nostalgia rather than offering any genuine educational value. A few commenters draw parallels to Disney's past interest in cryonics, further highlighting the unsettling implications of trying to "resurrect" him. Some discussion also revolves around the technical aspects of the animatronic and the uncanny valley effect. A minority express mild curiosity or appreciation for the technical achievement, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly negative.
OpenAI is restructuring to better pursue its mission of ensuring safe and beneficial artificial general intelligence (AGI). They're creating two new entities: "OpenAI Nonprofit" will continue to guide their mission, fund open-source AI research, and advocate for responsible AI development. "OpenAI LP," a capped-profit company, will conduct product development and other commercial activities. This structure allows them to raise capital for computationally intensive AGI research while ensuring that any excess returns beyond the cap will flow back to the nonprofit for the benefit of humanity. This change reflects their evolving needs and commitment to prioritizing their long-term mission over immediate profits.
HN commenters express skepticism and concern about OpenAI's restructuring announcement. Many see it as a power grab by Sam Altman and Ilya Sutskever, consolidating control under the guise of AGI development urgency. Some speculate about internal conflicts and the possibility of Altman positioning OpenAI for acquisition by Microsoft. Others question the sincerity of their stated mission, given the perceived shift towards commercial interests. Several commenters also criticize the lack of transparency and specific details in the announcement, calling it vague and performative. A few express cautious optimism, hoping the changes will lead to faster AGI progress, but the overall sentiment is one of distrust and apprehension about the future direction of OpenAI.
Onyx Boox, known for its e-ink Android tablets, has unveiled a new 25.3-inch color e-ink monitor, the Mira Pro, priced at $1,900. This monitor boasts a 3200 x 1800 resolution and utilizes Kaleido 3 color e-ink technology, offering a wider color gamut and faster refresh rates than previous generations. While still slower than traditional monitors, it targets users sensitive to eye strain and those who primarily work with text-based documents, code, or comics. The Mira Pro runs Android 11 and features several ports, including USB-C with DisplayPort support, allowing connection to various devices.
Hacker News users discussed the high price point of the Onyx Boox Mira Pro, with some expressing interest despite the cost due to its unique eye-friendly nature, particularly for coding and writing. Several commenters questioned the value proposition compared to larger, higher-resolution traditional monitors at a lower price. The slow refresh rate was also a major concern, limiting its use cases primarily to static content consumption and text-based work. Some users shared positive experiences with previous E Ink monitors, highlighting their benefits for focused work, while others suggested waiting for future iterations with improved color and refresh rates at a more accessible price. A few commenters also discussed potential niche applications like displaying dashboards or using it as a secondary monitor for specific tasks.
A new study from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) reveals that proposed cuts to federal R&D funding would significantly harm the U.S. economy. Reducing public investment in research and development by $20 billion annually over the next ten years would decrease GDP by an estimated $443 billion, costing over 200,000 jobs and impacting industries like pharmaceuticals, computer systems design, and scientific research. The ITIF argues that these cuts would disproportionately affect early-stage research, hindering future innovation and economic growth, with long-term consequences far outweighing any perceived short-term savings.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the study's conclusion that cutting public R&D funding harms the economy. Several pointed out the long-term nature of research investments, arguing that short-sighted budget cuts sacrifice future innovation and growth. Some highlighted specific examples of crucial technologies, like mRNA vaccines and GPS, stemming from publicly funded research. A few commenters were more skeptical, questioning the methodology and suggesting the study overstated the impact. Others discussed the complexities of government bureaucracy and potential inefficiencies in allocating research funds, but even these comments didn't dispute the fundamental importance of public R&D. The overall sentiment leaned heavily toward supporting continued and even increased investment in scientific research.
Anil Dash argues that "AI-first" is being used by some companies similarly to "Return To Office" mandates – as a way to exert control and pressure employees, often without clear justification of improved productivity or business outcomes. While acknowledging AI's potential, he highlights the cynical application of the term as a lever for power dynamics and employee surveillance, demanding adherence to new tools and processes under the guise of innovation, rather than genuinely integrating AI strategically. This echoes the RTO push where the stated benefits of in-person collaboration often masked a desire for managerial oversight and traditional power structures. He cautions against blindly adopting "AI-first" without critical evaluation and advocates for focusing on demonstrable value and ethical considerations.
HN commenters largely see "AI-first" as another management fad driven by hype and a desire for control, similar to the return-to-office push. Several express skepticism that enforced AI adoption will boost productivity, arguing that it will likely lead to busywork and superficial engagement. Some predict it will exacerbate existing inequalities, benefiting larger companies and potentially leading to job displacement. Others point out the irony of companies pushing AI adoption while simultaneously banning or restricting employee access to tools like ChatGPT. A few suggest "AI-first" might be beneficial in certain specific contexts, but the prevailing sentiment is one of cynicism and concern about its potential misuse. Several highlight the importance of focusing on actual business problems rather than blindly adopting technology.
Bose's groundbreaking "Magic Carpet" suspension, originally developed for military use and later adapted for high-end off-road vehicles, is finally becoming commercially available worldwide. ClearMotion, which acquired the technology from Bose, is offering a compact, scalable version of the system called "Genesis" to automotive OEMs globally. This technology uses sophisticated algorithms and electromagnetic motors to actively counteract road imperfections in real-time, drastically improving ride comfort and handling. The system can also potentially enhance safety features like emergency braking and stability control. While initially targeted at luxury vehicles, ClearMotion aims to democratize the technology and eventually bring it to mass-market cars.
HN commenters express skepticism about the practicality and cost-effectiveness of the Bose suspension system, particularly for consumer vehicles. Some doubt the "magic carpet ride" claims, suggesting traditional suspension advancements offer similar benefits at lower costs. Others question the system's robustness and longevity given its complexity. A few express excitement at its potential applications beyond cars, like heavy machinery or wheelchairs. Several users discuss prior attempts at active suspension, noting their limited commercial success due to high costs and complexity. There's also debate about the suitability of Citroën's hydropneumatic suspension as a comparison point, with some highlighting its unique comfort characteristics.
The author details building a translator app surpassing Google Translate and DeepL for their specific niche (Chinese to English literary translation) by focusing on fine-tuning pre-trained large language models with a carefully curated, high-quality dataset of literary translations. They stress the importance of data quality over quantity, employing rigorous filtering and cleaning processes. Key lessons learned include prioritizing the training data's alignment with the target domain, optimizing prompt engineering for nuanced outputs, and iteratively evaluating and refining the model's performance with human feedback. This approach allowed for superior performance in their niche compared to generic, broadly trained models, demonstrating the power of specialized training data for specific translation tasks.
Hacker News commenters generally praised the author's technical approach, particularly their use of large language models and the clever prompt engineering to extract translations and contextual information. Some questioned the long-term viability of relying on closed-source LLMs like GPT-4 due to cost and potential API changes, suggesting open-source models as an alternative, albeit with acknowledged performance trade-offs. Several users shared their own experiences and frustrations with existing translation tools, highlighting issues with accuracy and context sensitivity, which the author's approach seems to address. A few expressed skepticism about the claimed superior performance without more rigorous testing and public availability of the app. The discussion also touched on the difficulties of evaluating translation quality, suggesting human evaluation as the gold standard, while acknowledging its cost and scalability challenges.
Summary of Comments ( 270 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44117779
HN commenters are largely skeptical of Japan Post's new digital address system. Many see it as a solution in search of a problem, questioning the need for another addressing system when physical addresses and GPS coordinates already exist. Some suspect ulterior motives, suggesting Japan Post is trying to create a proprietary system to maintain relevance or gather data. The complexity of the system, requiring users to generate and manage 12-digit codes, is also criticized. A few commenters mention similar systems in other countries, noting varying degrees of success and adoption. Overall, the sentiment is that this system is unlikely to gain widespread traction due to its perceived redundancy and inconvenience.
The Hacker News post titled "Japan Post launches 'digital address' system" generated a moderate discussion with several insightful comments.
Several commenters questioned the practical value and necessity of the system, especially given Japan's existing robust address system. One commenter pointed out the potential redundancy, suggesting that the existing system, which uses geographic coordinates down to the building level, already provides a highly precise location. They also raised concerns about the system's interoperability with other systems and its reliance on a single, centralized provider. Another user echoed this sentiment, suggesting that using standard latitude and longitude would be a more universally applicable solution.
The potential for misuse and privacy concerns were also raised. One commenter expressed skepticism about the "digital mailbox" feature, questioning its utility and highlighting the risk of spam and unwanted mail.
Another line of discussion focused on the technical implementation of the system. Commenters speculated on the possibility of it being based on 3-words or similar systems, and discussed the potential benefits and drawbacks of such an approach.
Some commenters drew comparisons with other digital address systems, such as those used in India and the UK. They discussed the relative merits of each system and the challenges faced in their implementation.
A few commenters offered a more positive perspective, suggesting that the system could be useful for package delivery and other logistical purposes. One commenter highlighted the potential for improved efficiency in delivery services, particularly in areas with complex or ambiguous addresses.
Finally, several commenters pointed out the historical context of the Japanese addressing system and the cultural factors that may have influenced the development of the new digital system.