This blog post offers a collection of macOS tips and tricks to enhance productivity and user experience. It covers various aspects of the operating system, from basic shortcuts like quickly hiding all other applications (⌘⌥H) to more advanced techniques involving the terminal and shell scripting. The post highlights features such as using the Preview app for quick image edits, leveraging Quick Look for file previews and actions, customizing the Dock and menu bar, and employing keyboard shortcuts for various tasks. It also emphasizes the power of the Terminal for automating actions and managing system settings, and recommends several useful third-party applications to further improve workflow.
Bild AI is a new tool that uses AI to help users understand construction blueprints. It can extract key information like room dimensions, materials, and quantities, effectively translating complex 2D drawings into structured data. This allows for easier cost estimation, progress tracking, and identification of potential issues early in the construction process. Currently in beta, Bild aims to streamline communication and improve efficiency for everyone involved in a construction project.
Hacker News users discussed Bild AI's potential and limitations. Some expressed skepticism about the accuracy of AI interpretation, particularly with complex or hand-drawn blueprints, and the challenge of handling revisions. Others saw promise in its application for cost estimation, project management, and code generation. The need for human oversight was a recurring theme, with several commenters suggesting AI could assist but not replace experienced professionals. There was also discussion of existing solutions and the competitive landscape, along with curiosity about Bild AI's specific approach and data training methods. Finally, several comments touched on broader industry trends, such as the increasing digitization of construction and the potential for AI to improve efficiency and reduce errors.
vscli is a command-line interface tool designed to streamline the process of launching Visual Studio Code and Cursor editor devcontainers. It simplifies the often cumbersome process of navigating to a project directory and then opening it in a container, allowing users to quickly open projects in their respective dev environments directly from the command line. The tool supports project-specific configuration, allowing for customized settings and automating common tasks associated with launching devcontainers. This results in a more efficient workflow for developers working with containerized development environments.
HN users generally praised vscli for its simplicity and usefulness in streamlining the devcontainer workflow. Several commenters appreciated the tool's ability to eliminate the need for manually navigating to a project directory before opening it in a container, finding it a significant time-saver. Some discussion revolved around alternative methods, such as using VS Code's built-in remote functionality or shell aliases. However, the consensus leaned towards vscli offering a more convenient and user-friendly experience for managing multiple devcontainer projects. A few users suggested potential improvements, including better handling of projects with spaces in their paths and the addition of features like automatic port forwarding.
Stack-Ranker is a simple web app designed to help users prioritize any list of items. By presenting two items at a time and asking users to choose which is more important, it uses a sorting algorithm similar to merge sort to efficiently generate a ranked list. The resulting prioritized list can be copied or saved for later, and the tool offers the ability to import lists and randomize order for unbiased comparisons. It's pitched as a lightweight, no-frills solution for quickly prioritizing anything from tasks and features to movies and books.
HN users generally expressed skepticism about the "stack ranking" method proposed by the website. Several commenters pointed out that simply making lists and prioritizing items isn't novel and questioned the value proposition of the tool. Some suggested existing methods like spreadsheets or even pen and paper were sufficient. There was a discussion around the potential for overthinking prioritization and the importance of actually taking action. The lack of a clear use case beyond basic list-making was a common criticism, with some users wondering how the tool handled more complex prioritization scenarios. Several users also expressed concerns about the website's design and UI.
Corporate.watch is a simple website that humorously reimagines the current time using corporate jargon. Instead of traditional numerical time, it displays phrases like "End of Q1 Business Alignment Sync" or "Ideation Brainstorm Touchpoint" to represent different times of day, satirizing the often-opaque language used in corporate settings. The site offers a quick, amusing way to check the time while poking fun at corporate culture.
Hacker News users generally found the "corporate time" website humorous and relatable, appreciating the satire of corporate jargon. Several commenters shared their own experiences with similar time-wasting practices in corporate environments, including pointless meetings and obfuscated communication. Some found the specific examples on the site, like "circling back" and "bandwidth," particularly resonant. While some debated the effectiveness of the humor, the prevailing sentiment was amusement and recognition of the absurdities of corporate culture. A few commenters suggested improvements to the site, such as adding more phrases or making it interactive.
Micro Journal is a minimalist, distraction-free writing tool designed for quick journaling and note-taking. It prioritizes simplicity and privacy by storing entries locally in plain text files, eliminating the need for accounts, cloud syncing, or databases. The interface is deliberately barebones, offering only essential features like creating, saving, and searching entries. This focus on core functionality aims to encourage regular writing by reducing friction and ensuring quick access to past thoughts and ideas.
Hacker News users generally praised the Micro Journal for its minimalist design and focus on distraction-free writing. Several commenters appreciated its open-source nature and the use of readily available components, making it easy to replicate or modify. Some discussed the potential benefits of e-ink for focused writing and its lower power consumption. A few expressed concerns about the limited functionality compared to more feature-rich options, while others suggested potential improvements like a larger screen or different keyboard layouts. The project sparked discussion about the value of dedicated writing devices and the desire for simpler, more focused technology. Some users shared their own experiences with similar minimalist writing setups and offered alternative software suggestions.
Calendar.txt outlines a simple, universal calendar format based on plain text. Each line represents a day, formatted as YYYY-MM-DD followed by optional event descriptions separated by tabs. This minimalist approach allows for easy creation, parsing, and manipulation by any text editor or scripting tool, promoting interoperability across diverse platforms and applications. The post emphasizes the benefits of this format's portability, version control friendliness, and longevity, contrasting it with proprietary calendar systems that often lock users into specific software or data formats. The suggested structure allows for complex recurring events and to-do lists with simple extensions, making it adaptable to various scheduling needs.
Hacker News users discuss the minimalist approach of calendar.txt, appreciating its simplicity and portability. Some highlight its alignment with the Unix philosophy of doing one thing well. Others suggest improvements like adding support for recurring events or integration with other tools. A few users express skepticism, finding the plain text format too limiting for practical use, while others champion its accessibility and ease of parsing. The discussion also touches upon alternative calendar solutions and the benefits of plain text for archiving and data longevity. Several commenters share their personal workflows incorporating plain text files for task management and scheduling.
Frustrated with excessive phone use, the creator developed "Touch Grass," an Android app designed to encourage breaks from screen time. The app uses GPS to confirm the user is physically outside and then starts a timer. Only after spending a user-defined amount of time outdoors will the app grant access to blocked apps, effectively locking the user out until they've "touched grass." This gamified approach aims to promote healthier digital habits and reconnect users with the real world.
Hacker News commenters generally found the "touch grass" app amusing, but impractical. Several questioned the effectiveness of physically touching grass through a phone screen, noting the inherent irony and missing the point of the idiom. Some suggested improvements like requiring a photo of actual grass or GPS verification of being outdoors. Others highlighted the performative nature of the app, comparing it to other avoidance techniques. A few commenters appreciated the humor and simple execution, viewing it as a lighthearted take on the problem of doomscrolling. Some pointed out the potential for addictive gamification of "touching grass" itself. Overall, the consensus leaned towards the app being a fun, albeit slightly absurd, commentary on internet overuse rather than a serious solution.
The author explains their extensive use of Org Mode, an Emacs extension, as a powerful, all-encompassing tool beyond simple note-taking. They highlight its flexibility for managing writing projects, from initial brainstorming and outlining to drafting, editing, and publishing. Org Mode's structured format, using plain text and simple markup, facilitates easy reorganization, version control with Git, and export to various formats like HTML and PDF. The author demonstrates how features like tags, links, and the ability to embed code and results directly into documents make it ideal for technical writing, literate programming, and project management, ultimately creating a unified system for knowledge creation and organization.
Hacker News users generally praised the article for its clear explanation of Org Mode's benefits and the author's workflow. Several commenters shared their own experiences and tips for using Org Mode, highlighting its versatility for tasks beyond writing, such as project management and note-taking. Some discussed the learning curve associated with Org Mode, acknowledging its initial complexity but emphasizing the long-term payoff. A few users mentioned alternative tools, but the overall sentiment leaned towards appreciating Org Mode's powerful features and extensibility. The discussion also touched upon the advantages of plain text and the philosophical appeal of owning your data.
Paul Samuels advocates for using simple, project-specific shell scripts instead of complex build systems or task runners for small to medium-sized projects. He argues that shell scripts offer better transparency, debuggability, and control, while reducing cognitive overhead. They facilitate easier understanding of project dependencies and build processes, which ultimately contributes to better maintainability, especially for solo developers or small teams. By leveraging the shell's built-in features and readily available Unix tools, project scripts provide a lightweight yet powerful approach to managing common development tasks.
Hacker News users generally praised the simplicity and practicality of "Project Scripts." Several commenters appreciated the lightweight nature of the approach compared to more complex build systems or dedicated project management tools, highlighting the benefit of reduced cognitive overhead. Some suggested potential improvements like incorporating direnv or using a Makefile for more complex projects. A few users expressed skepticism, arguing that the proposed "Project Scripts" offered little beyond basic shell scripting and questioned the need for a dedicated term. Others found the idea valuable for its focus on explicitness and ease of sharing project setup within a team. The discussion also touched on related tools like Taskfile and justfile, comparing their features and complexity to the author's approach.
The core message of "Just Write" is to overcome the paralysis of perfectionism and the fear of judgment by simply starting to write. Don't get bogged down in elaborate outlines or editing; instead, prioritize consistent writing practice to develop your skills and discover your voice. The more you write, the easier it becomes, and the better your writing will be. Embrace imperfection, focus on quantity over quality initially, and view writing as a process of iterative refinement. Over time, this consistent effort will lead to significant improvement and unlock your creative potential.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the core message of "Just Write," emphasizing the importance of consistent writing for skill development and idea generation. Several commenters shared their personal experiences with writing streaks and the positive impact it had on their clarity of thought and ability to articulate ideas. Some cautioned against focusing solely on quantity over quality, suggesting a balance is needed. The idea of lowering the bar for publishing, embracing imperfection, and iterating based on feedback was also discussed. One commenter pointed out the parallels between writing and coding, highlighting the iterative nature of both. Another popular sentiment was the importance of finding a niche and writing about topics that genuinely interest the author.
Ruby on Rails remains relevant due to its mature ecosystem, developer productivity, and cost-effectiveness. Its convention-over-configuration approach, vast library of gems, and active community allow for rapid prototyping and development, making it ideal for startups and projects requiring fast iteration. While newer frameworks like Next.js offer advantages in certain areas, Rails excels in its simplicity and robust tooling, enabling businesses to quickly build and deploy complex applications without significant upfront investment, especially when experienced Rails developers are readily available. The framework's stability and focus on developer happiness contribute to its enduring appeal in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Hacker News users discuss the merits of Rails versus Next.js, generally agreeing that both have their place. Some commenters highlight Rails' maturity and developer-friendly ecosystem as key advantages, especially for rapid prototyping and less complex applications. Others point out Next.js's performance benefits and suitability for larger, more dynamic projects. The maintainability of JavaScript versus Ruby is debated, with some arguing for Ruby's cleaner syntax and easier long-term maintenance. Several commenters note the importance of choosing the right tool for the specific project, emphasizing factors like team expertise and project requirements. The overall sentiment suggests that Rails remains a relevant and valuable framework, despite the increasing popularity of JavaScript-based solutions like Next.js.
The Hacker News post showcases an AI-powered voice agent designed to manage Gmail. This agent, accessed through a dedicated web interface, allows users to interact with their inbox conversationally, using voice commands to perform actions like reading emails, composing replies, archiving, and searching. The goal is to provide a hands-free, more efficient way to handle email, particularly beneficial for multitasking or accessibility.
Hacker News users generally expressed skepticism and concerns about privacy regarding the AI voice agent for Gmail. Several commenters questioned the value proposition, wondering why voice control would be preferable to existing keyboard shortcuts and features within Gmail. The potential for errors and the need for precise language when dealing with email were also highlighted as drawbacks. Some users expressed discomfort with granting access to their email data, and the closed-source nature of the project further amplified these privacy worries. The lack of a clear explanation of the underlying AI technology also drew criticism. There was some interest in the technical implementation, but overall, the reception was cautious, with many commenters viewing the project as potentially more trouble than it's worth.
Jon Blow reflects on the concept of a "daylight computer," a system designed for focused work during daylight hours. He argues against the always-on, notification-driven nature of modern computing, proposing a machine that prioritizes deep work and mindful engagement. This involves limiting distractions, emphasizing local data storage, and potentially even restricting network access. The goal is to reclaim a sense of control and presence, fostering a healthier relationship with technology by aligning its use with natural rhythms and promoting focused thought over constant connectivity.
Hacker News users largely praised the Daylight Computer project for its ambition and innovative approach to personal computing. Several commenters appreciated the focus on local-first software and the potential for increased privacy and control over data. Some expressed skepticism about the project's feasibility and the challenges of building a sustainable ecosystem around a niche operating system. Others debated the merits of the chosen hardware and software stack, suggesting alternatives like RISC-V and questioning the reliance on Electron. A few users shared their personal experiences with similar projects and offered practical advice on development and community building. Overall, the discussion reflected a cautious optimism about the project's potential, tempered by a realistic understanding of the difficulties involved in disrupting the established computing landscape.
Harper's LLM code generation workflow centers around using LLMs for iterative code refinement rather than complete program generation. They start with a vague idea, translate it into a natural language prompt, and then use an LLM (often GitHub Copilot) to generate a small code snippet. This output is then critically evaluated, edited, and re-prompted to the LLM for further refinement. This cycle continues, focusing on small, manageable pieces of code and leveraging the LLM as a powerful autocomplete tool. The overall strategy prioritizes human control and understanding of the code, treating the LLM as an assistant in the coding process, not a replacement for the developer. They highlight the importance of clearly communicating intent to the LLM through the prompt, and emphasize the need for developers to retain responsibility for the final code.
HN commenters generally express skepticism about the author's LLM-heavy coding workflow. Several suggest that focusing on improving fundamental programming skills and using traditional debugging tools would be more effective in the long run. Some see the workflow as potentially useful for boilerplate generation, but worry about over-reliance on LLMs leading to a decline in core coding proficiency and an inability to debug or understand generated code. The debugging process described by the author, involving repeatedly prompting the LLM, is seen as particularly inefficient. A few commenters raise concerns about the cost and security implications of sharing sensitive code with third-party LLM providers. There's also a discussion about the limited context window of LLMs and the difficulty of applying them to larger projects.
An analysis of top researchers across various disciplines revealed that approximately 10% publish at incredibly high rates, likely unsustainable without questionable practices. These researchers produced papers at a pace suggesting a new publication every five days, raising concerns about potential shortcuts like salami slicing, honorary authorship, and insufficient peer review. While some researchers naturally produce more work, the study suggests this extreme output level hints at systemic issues within academia, incentivizing quantity over quality and potentially impacting research integrity.
Hacker News users discuss the implications of a small percentage of researchers publishing an extremely high volume of papers. Some question the validity of the study's methodology, pointing out potential issues like double-counting authors with similar names and the impact of large research groups. Others express skepticism about the value of such prolific publication, suggesting it incentivizes quantity over quality and leads to a flood of incremental or insignificant research. Some commenters highlight the pressures of the academic system, where publishing frequently is essential for career advancement. The discussion also touches on the potential for AI-assisted writing to exacerbate this trend, and the need for alternative metrics to evaluate research impact beyond simple publication counts. A few users provide anecdotal evidence of researchers gaming the system by salami-slicing their work into multiple smaller publications.
File Pilot is a new file manager focused on speed and a modern user experience. It boasts instant startup and file browsing, a dual-pane interface for efficient file operations, and extensive customization options like themes and keyboard shortcuts. Built with a robust architecture using Rust and Qt, File Pilot aims to provide a reliable and performant alternative to existing file explorers on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Key features include tabbed browsing, a built-in terminal, seamless file previews, and advanced filtering capabilities. File Pilot is currently available as a free technical preview.
HN commenters generally praised File Pilot's speed and clean interface, with several noting its responsiveness felt superior even to native file managers. Some appreciated specific features like the tabbed interface, customizable keyboard shortcuts, and the dual-pane view. A few users requested features like the ability to edit text files directly within the application and improved search functionality. Concerns were raised about the developer's choice to use Electron, citing potential performance overhead and resource consumption. There was also discussion around the lack of a Linux version and the developer's plans for future development and monetization. Some commenters expressed skepticism about the long-term viability of the project given its reliance on a single developer.
Programming with chronic pain presents unique challenges, requiring a focus on pacing and energy management. The author emphasizes the importance of short work intervals, frequent breaks, and prioritizing tasks based on energy levels, rather than strict deadlines. Ergonomics play a crucial role, advocating for adjustable setups and regular movement. Mental health is also key, emphasizing self-compassion and acceptance of limitations. The author stresses that productivity isn't about working longer, but working smarter and sustainably within the constraints of chronic pain. This approach allows for a continued career in programming while prioritizing well-being.
HN commenters largely expressed sympathy and shared their own experiences with chronic pain and its impact on productivity. Several suggested specific tools and techniques like dictation software, voice coding, ergonomic setups, and the Pomodoro method. Some highlighted the importance of finding a supportive work environment and advocating for oneself. Others emphasized the mental and emotional toll of chronic pain and recommended mindfulness, therapy, and pacing oneself to avoid burnout. A few commenters also questioned the efficacy of some suggested solutions, emphasizing the highly individual nature of chronic pain and the need for personalized strategies.
Accelerated career growth comes from seeking out high-growth environments, even if it means sacrificing comfort and stability. These environments offer a rapid accumulation of diverse experiences, increased responsibilities, and exposure to a wider range of challenges. This condensed timeframe for learning equates to years of experience gained in traditional settings. While demanding, embracing these opportunities allows individuals to level up their skills, expand their network, and achieve significant career progression much faster. This rapid growth often involves joining early-stage companies or taking on new roles in fast-moving sectors, requiring a proactive approach and a willingness to learn and adapt quickly.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that intense, focused work on challenging projects can accelerate professional growth. Several share personal anecdotes echoing the author's experience, describing rapid skill acquisition through dedicated projects or periods of intense learning. Some caution against burnout and emphasize the importance of deliberate practice and mentorship alongside hard work. A few commenters note that this type of accelerated growth is more common in certain fields like software development, where rapid iteration and readily available feedback loops facilitate faster learning. There's also discussion about the role of luck and being in the right place at the right time, with some arguing that while hard work is essential, opportunity plays a significant role.
Mikey is a free, open-source meeting note-taking application for Windows designed to streamline the process of capturing and organizing meeting information. It focuses on simplicity and efficiency, offering features like automatic speaker identification, timestamped notes, action item tracking, and easy export options to plain text, Markdown, or JSON. The aim is to allow participants to focus on the meeting itself rather than scrambling to take notes, resulting in more productive and engaging discussions.
HN commenters generally expressed interest in Mikey, praising its simple approach and potential usefulness for quickly jotting down notes during meetings. Some suggested improvements like global hotkeys, Markdown support, and cloud syncing. A few users compared it to other note-taking tools, mentioning alternatives like Notepad++, Typora, and dedicated meeting software. Concerns were raised regarding the Windows-only limitation, with commenters hoping for cross-platform compatibility or suggesting similar existing solutions for other operating systems. Some skepticism was expressed about the long-term viability of small, independent projects like this.
TL;DW (Too Long; Didn't Watch) is a website that condenses Distill.pub articles, primarily those focused on machine learning research, into shorter, more digestible formats. It utilizes AI-powered summarization and key information extraction to present the core concepts, visualizations, and takeaways of each article without requiring viewers to watch the often lengthy accompanying YouTube videos. The site aims to make complex research more accessible to a wider audience by providing concise summaries, interactive elements, and links back to the original content for those who wish to delve deeper.
HN commenters generally praised TL;DW, finding its summaries accurate and useful, especially for longer technical videos. Some appreciated the inclusion of timestamps to easily jump to specific sections within the original video. Several users suggested improvements, including support for more channels, the ability to correct inaccuracies, and adding community features like voting or commenting on summaries. Some expressed concerns about the potential for copyright issues and the impact on creators' revenue if viewers only watch the summaries. A few commenters pointed out existing similar tools and questioned the long-term viability of the project.
This blog post details how to create and manage recurring checklists within Emacs' Org Mode. It leverages the SCHEDULED and STYLE properties of list items to automate the reappearance of tasks at specified intervals. The author demonstrates how to define a daily checklist template, schedule its repetition daily, and configure it to reset each morning, ready for a new day's checking. Furthermore, it explores more complex scenarios, including using timestamps to track completion history and adding specific scheduling keywords for more nuanced control over recurrence, like excluding weekends. The post also briefly covers handling checklist items that don't need daily resetting.
Hacker News users generally praised the article for its clear explanation of using Org Mode for recurring tasks. Several commenters shared their own workflows and modifications, including using the org-super-agenda package, scripting with elisp for more complex recurring tasks, and integrating with mobile apps like Orgzly. Some pointed out potential limitations of the author's approach, suggesting alternatives like dynamic blocks for greater flexibility. The discussion also touched on broader Org Mode features, such as capturing tasks and agenda views. A few users highlighted the steep learning curve of Emacs and Org Mode but affirmed their power once mastered.
Firing programmers due to perceived AI obsolescence is shortsighted and potentially disastrous. The article argues that while AI can automate certain coding tasks, it lacks the deep understanding, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills necessary for complex software development. Replacing experienced programmers with junior engineers relying on AI tools will likely lead to lower-quality code, increased technical debt, and difficulty maintaining and evolving software systems in the long run. True productivity gains come from leveraging AI to augment programmers, not replace them, freeing them from tedious tasks to focus on higher-level design and architectural challenges.
Hacker News users largely agreed with the article's premise that firing programmers in favor of AI is a mistake. Several commenters pointed out that current AI tools are better suited for augmenting programmers, not replacing them. They highlighted the importance of human oversight in software development for tasks like debugging, understanding context, and ensuring code quality. Some argued that the "dumbest mistake" isn't AI replacing programmers, but rather management's misinterpretation of AI capabilities and the rush to cut costs without considering the long-term implications. Others drew parallels to previous technological advancements, emphasizing that new tools tend to shift job roles rather than eliminate them entirely. A few dissenting voices suggested that while complete replacement isn't imminent, certain programming tasks could be automated, potentially impacting junior roles.
Anthropic has introduced the Anthropic Economic Index (AEI), a new metric designed to track the economic impact of future AI models. The AEI measures how much value AI systems can generate across a variety of economically relevant tasks, including coding, writing, and math. It uses benchmarks based on real-world datasets and tasks, aiming to provide a more concrete and quantifiable measure of AI progress than traditional metrics. Anthropic hopes the AEI will be a valuable tool for researchers, policymakers, and the public to understand and anticipate the potential economic transformations driven by advancements in AI.
HN commenters discuss Anthropic's Economic Index, expressing skepticism about its methodology and usefulness. Several question the reliance on GPT-4, pointing out its limitations and potential biases. The small sample size and limited scope of tasks are also criticized, with some suggesting the index might simply reflect GPT-4's training data. Others argue that human economic activity is too complex to be captured by such a simplistic benchmark. The lack of open-sourcing and the proprietary nature of the underlying model also draw criticism, hindering independent verification and analysis. While some find the concept interesting, the overall sentiment is cautious, with many calling for more transparency and rigor before drawing any significant conclusions. A few express concerns about the potential for AI to replace human labor, echoing themes from the original article.
Zeminary Arrays offers an experimental web app providing infinitely expanding horizontal and vertical arrays of text editors. Each editor can be used for coding, writing, or note-taking, and supports Markdown rendering. Users can create new arrays, add or delete individual editors within them, and navigate the grid seamlessly. The application aims to provide a flexible and expansive workspace for managing various text-based tasks concurrently.
HN users generally praised the clean UI and unique approach of the infinite horizontal array of text editors. Several commenters questioned the practical use cases, wondering what problems it solves beyond novelty. Some suggested potential applications like managing code snippets, comparing different versions of text, or outlining long documents. A few users experienced minor glitches, like unexpected behavior with the backspace key. There was also discussion about the technical implementation, particularly regarding memory management with large arrays and the potential benefits of using a different data structure. One commenter appreciated the editor's mobile-friendliness. Overall, the reception was positive, with curiosity about its potential applications driving the conversation.
This blog post details the author's highly automated Vim setup, emphasizing speed and efficiency. Leveraging plugins like vim-plug for plugin management and a variety of others for features like fuzzy finding, Git integration, and syntax highlighting, the author creates a streamlined coding environment. The post focuses on specific configurations and keybindings for tasks such as file navigation, code completion, compiling, and debugging, showcasing a personalized workflow built around minimizing friction and maximizing productivity within Vim. The ultimate goal is to achieve a near-IDE experience using Vim's powerful extensibility.
Hacker News users generally praised the author's approach to Vim automation, emphasizing the balance between leveraging Vim's powerful features and avoiding over-complication. Several commenters shared their own preferred plugins and workflows, highlighting tools like fzf, vim-projectionist, and CtrlP for file navigation, and luasnip and UltiSnips for snippets. Some appreciated the author's philosophy of learning Vim gradually and organically, rather than attempting to master everything at once. A few commenters discussed the trade-offs between using a highly configured Vim setup versus a more minimalist approach, and the potential drawbacks of relying too heavily on plugins. There was also a brief discussion about the relative merits of using language servers and other external tools within Vim.
Ocal is an AI-powered calendar app designed to intelligently schedule assignments and tasks. It analyzes your existing calendar and to-do list, understanding deadlines and estimated time requirements, then automatically allocates time slots for optimal productivity. Ocal aims to minimize procrastination and optimize your schedule by suggesting realistic time blocks for each task, allowing you to focus on the work itself rather than the planning. It integrates with existing calendar platforms and offers a streamlined interface for managing your commitments.
HN users generally expressed skepticism about Ocal's claimed ability to automatically schedule tasks. Some doubted the AI's capability to understand task dependencies and individual work styles, while others questioned its handling of unexpected events or changes in priorities. Several commenters pointed out that existing calendar applications already offer similar features, albeit without AI, suggesting that Ocal's value proposition isn't clear. There was also concern about privacy and the potential need to grant the app access to sensitive calendar data. A few users expressed interest in trying the product, but the overall sentiment leaned towards cautious skepticism.
Daily-notes.nvim is a Neovim plugin designed for effortless time-based journaling and planning. It enables users to quickly create and access daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly notes based on the current date, using fuzzy finding for easy navigation. The plugin supports custom date formats, integrates with the Telescope fuzzy finder, and offers features like opening notes for specific dates or creating notes if they don't exist. It aims to provide a streamlined and efficient workflow for maintaining a structured journal or planner within Neovim.
Hacker News users generally praised the daily-notes.nvim plugin for its simplicity and speed compared to alternatives like Obsidian. Several commenters appreciated its integration with Telescope.nvim for fuzzy finding. Some suggested improvements, including the ability to specify a custom date format and integration with the calendar.vim plugin. One commenter pointed out the potential benefit of using a simpler file naming convention for improved compatibility with other tools. Another user mentioned using a similar setup with plain Vim and expressed interest in trying the plugin. There was some discussion on the benefits of plain text notes versus a database-driven system, with proponents of plain text highlighting its flexibility and longevity.
This blog post details how to automatically remove macOS-specific files (.DS_Store and ._*) from external drives upon ejection. The author uses a combination of AppleScript and a LaunchAgent to trigger a cleanup script whenever a volume is ejected. The script leverages dot_clean to efficiently delete these often-annoying hidden files, preventing their proliferation on non-macOS systems. This automated approach replaces the need for manual cleanup and ensures a cleaner experience when sharing drives between different operating systems.
Commenters on Hacker News largely appreciated the simplicity and directness of the provided AppleScript solution for removing macOS-specific files from external drives upon ejection. Some highlighted the potential for data loss if used carelessly, especially with networked drives or if the script were modified to delete different files. Others offered alternative solutions, including using dot_clean, incorporating the script into a Hazel rule, or employing a shell script with find. The discussion also touched upon the annoyance factor of these files on other operating systems and the historical reasons for their existence, with some suggesting that their prevalence has diminished. A few commenters mentioned more robust solutions for syncing and backing up, which would obviate the need for such a script altogether.
FlashSpace is a free and open-source macOS application designed as a faster, more lightweight alternative to the built-in Spaces feature. It aims to provide smoother and more responsive virtual desktop switching, reducing lag and improving overall performance compared to the native solution. The project is hosted on GitHub and welcomes contributions.
Hacker News users generally praised FlashSpace for its speed and open-source nature, seeing it as a welcome alternative to the built-in macOS Spaces feature. Several commenters expressed interest in features like window previews within the Spaces overview and better integration with keyboard shortcuts. Some questioned the app's stability and long-term maintenance given it's a solo project. There was also discussion about existing window management alternatives and their respective strengths and weaknesses compared to FlashSpace, with mentions of yaba, Rectangle, and Amethyst. A few users shared their own experiences with similar personal projects and the challenges of balancing feature requests with maintainability.
Summary of Comments ( 271 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43201417
HN users generally praised the macOS tips listed in the article, finding them useful and well-organized. Several commenters highlighted specific tips they appreciated, such as using keyboard shortcuts for moving windows between monitors, the "Say" command for text-to-speech, and the ability to paste rich text into plain text fields with a modified paste command. Some users shared additional tips of their own, including using Automator for repetitive tasks and leveraging specific terminal commands. A few questioned the necessity of some of the listed "tricks," suggesting they are standard macOS features. Overall, the discussion revolved around the practicality of the tips and expanding upon the list with further macOS productivity enhancements.
The Hacker News post titled "macOS Tips and Tricks (2022)" linking to saurabhs.org/macos-tips generated a moderate number of comments, many of which delve into specific features, offer alternatives, or debate the merits of certain approaches.
Several commenters discuss keyboard shortcuts and window management. One user highlights the usefulness of Rectangle, a free window management tool, as a superior alternative to the paid Magnet app mentioned in the article. Another chimes in to recommend Moom, a different paid window management application, praising its flexibility and customizability. Further discussion revolves around keyboard shortcuts for switching between applications (Command+Tab) and the added functionality provided by holding down the Command key while using this shortcut, allowing for quitting or hiding applications.
Another thread centers on the use of the Terminal and related tools. One commenter suggests using
pbcopyandpbpastefor clipboard manipulation, enabling interaction between GUI applications and command-line tools. This sparks a side discussion about the benefits and drawbacks of using these tools versus native macOS features or dedicated clipboard managers. Someone else recommends exa as a modern replacement for thelscommand, highlighting its colorized output and more user-friendly features. The merits ofbatas a replacement forcatare also discussed, with users appreciating its syntax highlighting.The article's recommendation of using Homebrew for package management also receives attention. One commenter cautions against over-reliance on Homebrew, pointing out that it can sometimes interfere with system stability or create conflicts. They advocate for learning how to manage software installations manually, reserving Homebrew for specific use cases.
A few users express general appreciation for the tips provided in the article, finding them helpful and practical. Others offer additional tips not covered in the original article, such as using Automator for automating tasks and utilizing keyboard shortcuts for controlling volume and screen brightness.
A recurring theme in the comments is the preference for built-in macOS features over third-party tools where possible. Several users advocate for learning and utilizing the operating system's native capabilities before resorting to external applications, emphasizing that this approach often leads to a cleaner and more efficient workflow. However, others argue that certain third-party tools offer significant improvements over the default macOS experience and are justified in specific situations.