Researchers have built a 32-bit RISC-V processor using a monolayer of molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), a two-dimensional semiconductor. This achievement demonstrates the potential of 2D materials for creating extremely thin and energy-efficient transistors, pushing the boundaries of Moore's Law. While slower and larger than state-of-the-art silicon chips, this prototype represents a significant step towards practical applications of 2D semiconductors in computing. The processor, dubbed RV16XNano, successfully executed instructions and represents a promising foundation for future development of more complex and powerful 2D-material-based circuits.
The Joule Thief circuit is a simple, self-oscillating voltage booster that allows low-voltage sources, like a nearly depleted 1.5V battery, to power devices requiring higher voltages. It uses a single transistor, a resistor, and a toroidal transformer with a feedback winding. When the circuit is energized, the transistor initially conducts, allowing current to flow through the primary winding of the transformer. This builds a magnetic field. As the current increases, the voltage across the resistor also increases, eventually turning the transistor off. The collapsing magnetic field in the transformer induces a voltage in the secondary winding, which, combined with the remaining battery voltage, creates a high voltage pulse suitable for driving an LED or other small load. The feedback winding further reinforces this process, ensuring oscillation and efficient energy extraction from the battery.
Hacker News users discuss the Joule Thief circuit's simplicity and cleverness, highlighting its ability to extract power from nearly depleted batteries. Some debate the origin of the name, suggesting it's not about stealing energy but efficiently using what's available. Several commenters note the circuit's educational value for understanding inductors, transformers, and oscillators. Practical applications are also mentioned, including using Joule Thieves to power LEDs and as voltage boosters. There's a cautionary note about potential hazards like high-voltage spikes and flickering LEDs, depending on the implementation. Finally, some commenters offer variations on the circuit, such as using MOSFETs instead of bipolar transistors, and discuss its limitations with different battery chemistries.
Researchers have developed a new transistor that could significantly improve edge computing by enabling more efficient hardware implementations of fuzzy logic. This "ferroelectric FinFET" transistor can be reconfigured to perform various fuzzy logic operations, eliminating the need for complex digital circuits typically required. This simplification leads to smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient fuzzy logic hardware, ideal for edge devices with limited resources. The adaptable nature of the transistor allows it to handle the uncertainties and imprecise information common in real-world applications, making it well-suited for tasks like sensor processing, decision-making, and control systems in areas such as robotics and the Internet of Things.
Hacker News commenters expressed skepticism about the practicality of the reconfigurable fuzzy logic transistor. Several questioned the claimed benefits, particularly regarding power efficiency. One commenter pointed out that fuzzy logic usually requires more transistors than traditional logic, potentially negating any power savings. Others doubted the applicability of fuzzy logic to edge computing tasks in the first place, citing the prevalence of well-established and efficient algorithms for those applications. Some expressed interest in the technology, but emphasized the need for more concrete results beyond simulations. The overall sentiment was cautious optimism tempered by a demand for further evidence to support the claims.
Summary of Comments ( 39 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43621378
Hacker News users discuss the implications of a RISC-V processor built with a 2D semiconductor. Several express excitement about the potential for flexible electronics and extremely low power consumption, envisioning applications in wearables and IoT devices. Some question the practicality due to the current limitations in clock speed and memory integration, while others point out the significant achievement of creating a functional processor with this technology at all. A few commenters delve into the specifics of the fabrication process and the challenges of scaling this technology for commercial production. Concerns about the fragility of the material and the potential difficulty in handling and packaging are also raised. Overall, the sentiment leans towards cautious optimism about the long-term possibilities of 2D semiconductors in computing.
The Hacker News post "A 32-bit processor made with an atomically thin semiconductor" discussing an Ars Technica article about a RISC-V processor built using a 2D semiconductor, generated a moderate number of comments, many of which delve into the technical details and potential implications of the research.
Several commenters focused on the performance aspects. One noted the extremely low clock speed (1 kHz) and questioned the practical applications given this limitation. Another commenter built on this, explaining that the low clock speed is likely due to the high resistance of the thin semiconductor material. They further elaborated that while the transistor density could theoretically be much higher, the interconnect resistance would become a bottleneck.
The discussion also touched upon the challenges of manufacturing and scaling this technology. A commenter pointed out that creating larger, more complex chips using this 2D material would be difficult due to defects. They questioned whether it would be possible to scale this to create a commercially viable product. Another commenter highlighted the specific challenges in achieving uniformity and consistency in a large-scale manufacturing process for atomically thin materials.
The potential advantages of 2D semiconductors were also discussed. One commenter mentioned the possibility of flexible electronics, suggesting that this technology could pave the way for devices that are bendable or even foldable. Another commenter mentioned potential applications in areas where power consumption is extremely important since reducing the thickness to the atomic level can impact a device's energy requirements.
Some comments delved into the specifics of the RISC-V architecture. One commenter pointed out that while the processor is a 32-bit RISC-V design, it lacks features commonly found in modern processors, making it more of a proof-of-concept rather than a practical processor.
Finally, a few commenters expressed skepticism, suggesting that this research, while interesting, is a long way from commercial viability. They emphasized that the current limitations in performance and manufacturing make it unlikely to replace existing silicon technology in the near future.
In summary, the comments section explored the technical complexities, potential benefits, and significant challenges associated with using 2D semiconductors for processor design. While excitement was expressed for the potential of this technology, many commenters remained realistic about the long road ahead for commercialization.