Phind 2, a new AI search engine, significantly upgrades its predecessor with enhanced multi-step reasoning capabilities and the ability to generate visual answers, including diagrams and code flowcharts. It utilizes a novel method called "grounded reasoning" which allows it to access and process information from multiple sources to answer complex questions, offering more comprehensive and accurate responses. Phind 2 also features an improved conversational mode and an interactive code interpreter, making it a more powerful tool for both technical and general searches. This new version aims to provide clearer, more insightful answers than traditional search engines, moving beyond simply listing links.
Ghostwriter is a project that transforms the reMarkable 2 tablet into an interface for interacting with large language models (LLMs). It leverages the tablet's natural handwriting capabilities to send handwritten prompts to an LLM and displays the generated text response directly on the e-ink screen. Essentially, it allows users to write naturally and receive LLM-generated text, all within the distraction-free environment of the reMarkable 2. The project is open-source and allows for customization, including choosing the LLM and adjusting various settings.
HN commenters generally expressed excitement about Ghostwriter, particularly its potential for integrating handwritten input with LLMs. Several users pointed out the limitations of existing tablet-based coding solutions and saw Ghostwriter as a promising alternative. Some questioned the practicality of handwriting code extensively, while others emphasized its usefulness for diagrams, note-taking, and mathematical formulas, especially when combined with LLM capabilities. The discussion touched upon the desire for similar functionality with other tablets like the iPad and speculated on potential applications in education and creative fields. A few commenters expressed interest in the open-source nature of the project and its potential for customization.
This blog post details how to run the DeepSeek R1 671B large language model (LLM) entirely on a ~$2000 server built with an AMD EPYC 7452 CPU, 256GB of RAM, and consumer-grade NVMe SSDs. The author emphasizes affordability and accessibility, demonstrating a setup that avoids expensive server-grade hardware and leverages readily available components. The post provides a comprehensive guide covering hardware selection, OS installation, configuring the necessary software like PyTorch and CUDA, downloading the model weights, and ultimately running inference using the optimized llama.cpp implementation. It highlights specific optimization techniques, including using bitsandbytes for quantization and offloading parts of the model to the CPU RAM to manage its large size. The author successfully achieves a performance of ~2 tokens per second, enabling practical, albeit slower, local interaction with this powerful LLM.
HN commenters were skeptical about the true cost and practicality of running a 671B parameter model on a $2,000 server. Several pointed out that the $2,000 figure only covered the CPUs, excluding crucial components like RAM, SSDs, and GPUs, which would significantly inflate the total price. Others questioned the performance on such a setup, doubting it would be usable for anything beyond trivial tasks due to slow inference speeds. The lack of details on power consumption and cooling requirements was also criticized. Some suggested cloud alternatives might be more cost-effective in the long run, while others expressed interest in smaller, more manageable models. A few commenters shared their own experiences with similar hardware, highlighting the challenges of memory bandwidth and the potential need for specialized hardware like Infiniband for efficient communication between CPUs.
OpenAI announced a new, smaller language model called O3-mini. While significantly less powerful than their flagship models, it offers improved efficiency and reduced latency, making it suitable for tasks where speed and cost-effectiveness are paramount. This model is specifically designed for applications with lower compute requirements and simpler natural language processing tasks. While not as capable of complex reasoning or nuanced text generation as larger models, O3-mini represents a step towards making AI more accessible for a wider range of uses.
Hacker News users discussed the implications of OpenAI's smaller, more efficient O3-mini model. Several commenters expressed skepticism about the claimed performance improvements, particularly the assertion of 10x cheaper inference. They questioned the lack of detailed benchmarks and comparisons to existing open-source models, suggesting OpenAI was strategically withholding information to maintain a competitive edge. Others pointed out the potential for misuse and the ethical considerations of increasingly accessible and powerful AI models. A few commenters focused on the potential benefits, highlighting the lower cost as a key factor for broader adoption and experimentation. The closed-source nature of the model also drew criticism, with some advocating for more open development in the AI field.
This GitHub repository provides a barebones, easy-to-understand PyTorch implementation for training a small language model (LLM) from scratch. It focuses on simplicity and clarity, using a basic transformer architecture with minimal dependencies. The code offers a practical example of how LLMs work and allows experimentation with training on custom small datasets. While not production-ready or particularly performant, it serves as an excellent educational resource for understanding the core principles of LLM training and implementation.
Hacker News commenters generally praised smolGPT for its simplicity and educational value. Several appreciated that it provided a clear, understandable implementation of a transformer model, making it easier to grasp the underlying concepts. Some suggested improvements, like using Hugging Face's Trainer class for simplification and adding features like gradient checkpointing for lower memory usage. Others discussed the limitations of training such small models and the potential benefits of using pre-trained models for specific tasks. A few pointed out the project's similarity to nanoGPT, acknowledging its inspiration. The overall sentiment was positive, viewing smolGPT as a valuable learning resource for those interested in LLMs.
This Twitter thread details a comprehensive guide to setting up Deepseek-R1, a retrieval-based question-answering system, on a local machine. It outlines the necessary hardware, recommending a powerful GPU (like an RTX 4090) with substantial VRAM (24GB+) for optimal performance and a hefty amount of RAM (128GB or more). The guide covers software prerequisites, including CUDA, cuDNN, Python, and various libraries, along with the steps to download and install Deepseek's specific dependencies. Finally, it provides instructions on how to download and convert the Large Language Model (LLM) and retriever components, offering different options depending on available hardware resources. The thread also includes tips on configuring the setup and troubleshooting potential issues.
HN users discuss the practicality and cost of running the Deepseek-R1 model locally, given its substantial hardware requirements (8x A100 GPUs). Some express skepticism about the feasibility for most individuals, highlighting the significant upfront investment and ongoing electricity costs. Others suggest cloud computing as a more accessible alternative, albeit with its own expense. The discussion also touches on the potential for smaller, quantized models to offer a compromise between performance and resource requirements, with some expressing interest in seeing benchmarks comparing different model sizes. A few commenters question the necessity of such a large model for certain tasks and suggest exploring alternative approaches. Overall, the sentiment leans toward acknowledging the impressive technical achievement while remaining pragmatic about the accessibility challenges for average users.
The author embarked on a seemingly simple afternoon coding project: creating a basic Mastodon bot. They decided to leverage an LLM (Large Language Model) for assistance, expecting quick results. Instead, the LLM-generated code was riddled with subtle yet significant errors, leading to an unexpectedly prolonged debugging process. Four days later, the author was still wrestling with obscure issues like OAuth signature mismatches and library incompatibilities, ironically spending far more time troubleshooting the AI-generated code than they would have writing it from scratch. The experience highlighted the deceptive nature of LLM-produced code, which can appear correct at first glance but ultimately require significant developer effort to become functional. The author learned a valuable lesson about the limitations of current LLMs and the importance of carefully reviewing and understanding their output.
HN commenters generally express amusement and sympathy for the author's predicament, caught in an ever-expanding project due to trusting an LLM's overly optimistic estimations. Several note the seductive nature of LLMs for rapid prototyping and the tendency to underestimate the complexity of seemingly simple tasks, especially when integrating with existing systems. Some comments highlight the importance of skepticism towards LLM output and the need for careful planning and scoping, even for small projects. Others discuss the rabbit hole effect of adding "just one more feature," a phenomenon exacerbated by the ease with which LLMs can generate code for these additions. The author's transparency and humorous self-deprecation are also appreciated.
ErisForge is a Python library designed to generate adversarial examples aimed at disrupting the performance of large language models (LLMs). It employs various techniques, including prompt injection, jailbreaking, and data poisoning, to create text that causes LLMs to produce unexpected, inaccurate, or undesirable outputs. The goal is to provide tools for security researchers and developers to test the robustness and identify vulnerabilities in LLMs, thereby contributing to the development of more secure and reliable language models.
HN commenters generally expressed skepticism and amusement towards ErisForge. Several pointed out that "abliterating" LLMs is hyperbole, as the library simply generates adversarial prompts. Some questioned the practical implications and long-term effectiveness of such a tool, anticipating that LLM providers would adapt. Others jokingly suggested more dramatic or absurd methods of "abliteration." A few expressed interest in the project, primarily for research or educational purposes, focusing on understanding LLM vulnerabilities. There's also a thread discussing the ethics of such tools and the broader implications of adversarial attacks on AI models.
Jannik Grothusen built a cleaning robot prototype in just four days using GPT-4 to generate code. He prompted GPT-4 with high-level instructions like "grab the sponge," and the model generated the necessary robotic arm control code. The robot, built with off-the-shelf components including a Raspberry Pi and a camera, successfully performed basic cleaning tasks like wiping a whiteboard. This project demonstrates the potential of large language models like GPT-4 to simplify and accelerate robotics development by abstracting away complex low-level programming.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and potential of a GPT-4 powered cleaning robot. Several commenters were skeptical of the robot's actual capabilities, questioning the feasibility of complex task planning and execution based on the limited information provided. Some highlighted the difficulty of reliable object recognition and manipulation, particularly in unstructured environments like a home. Others pointed out the potential safety concerns of an autonomous robot interacting with a variety of household objects and chemicals. A few commenters expressed excitement about the possibilities, but overall the sentiment was one of cautious interest tempered by a dose of realism. The discussion also touched on the hype surrounding AI and the tendency to overestimate current capabilities.
Alibaba Cloud has released Qwen-2.5-1M, a large language model capable of handling context windows up to 1 million tokens. This significantly expands the model's ability to process lengthy documents, books, or even codebases in a single session. Building upon the previous Qwen-2.5 model, the 1M version maintains strong performance across various benchmarks, including long-context question answering and mathematical reasoning. The model is available in both chat and language model versions, and Alibaba Cloud is offering open access to the weights and code for the 7B parameter model, enabling researchers and developers to experiment and deploy their own instances. This open release aims to democratize access to powerful, long-context language models and foster innovation within the community.
Hacker News users discussed the impressive context window of Qwen 2.5-1M, but expressed skepticism about its practical usability. Several commenters questioned the real-world applications of such a large context window, pointing out potential issues with performance, cost, and the actual need to process such lengthy inputs. Others highlighted the difficulty in curating datasets large enough to train models effectively with million-token contexts. The closed-source nature of the model also drew criticism, limiting its potential for research and community contributions. Some compared it to other large context models like MosaicML's MPT, noting trade-offs in performance and accessibility. The general sentiment leaned towards cautious optimism, acknowledging the technical achievement while remaining pragmatic about its immediate implications.
Onit is an open-source desktop application providing a unified interface for various large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and local models. It aims to simplify access and management of these models, offering features like prompt templates, conversation history, and an intuitive user interface. The project is available on GitHub and designed to be extensible, allowing users to easily integrate new models and features.
HN users generally expressed enthusiasm for Onit, praising its clean UI, open-source nature, and support for multiple LLMs (including local models). Several commenters highlighted the value of running models locally for privacy and cost savings, with specific interest in the upcoming support for llama.cpp. Some pointed out existing similar projects like llama-gpt and queried about Onit's differentiating features. A few users requested additional functionality, such as better prompt management and the ability to export chat logs. The developer actively engaged with comments, addressing questions and acknowledging feature requests.
Anthropic has launched a new Citations API for its Claude language model. This API allows developers to retrieve the sources Claude used when generating a response, providing greater transparency and verifiability. The citations include URLs and, where available, spans of text within those URLs. This feature aims to help users assess the reliability of Claude's output and trace back the information to its original context. While the API strives for accuracy, Anthropic acknowledges that limitations exist and ongoing improvements are being made. They encourage users to provide feedback to further enhance the citation process.
Hacker News users generally expressed interest in Anthropic's new citation feature, viewing it as a positive step towards addressing hallucinations and increasing trustworthiness in LLMs. Some praised the transparency it offers, allowing users to verify information and potentially correct errors. Several commenters discussed the potential impact on academic research and the possibilities for integrating it with other tools and platforms. Concerns were raised about the potential for manipulation of citations and the need for clearer evaluation metrics. A few users questioned the extent to which the citations truly reflected the model's reasoning process versus simply matching phrases. Overall, the sentiment leaned towards cautious optimism, with many acknowledging the limitations while still appreciating the progress.
Llama.vim is a Vim plugin that integrates large language models (LLMs) for text completion directly within the editor. It leverages locally running GGML-compatible models, offering privacy and speed advantages over cloud-based alternatives. The plugin supports various functionalities, including code generation, translation, summarization, and general text completion, all accessible through simple Vim commands. Users can configure different models and parameters to tailor the LLM's behavior to their needs. By running models locally, Llama.vim aims to provide a seamless and efficient AI-assisted writing experience without relying on external APIs or internet connectivity.
Hacker News users generally expressed enthusiasm for Llama.vim, praising its speed and offline functionality. Several commenters appreciated the focus on simplicity and the avoidance of complex dependencies like Python, highlighting the benefits of a pure Vimscript implementation. Some users suggested potential improvements like asynchronous updates and better integration with specific LLM APIs. A few questioned the practicality for larger models due to resource constraints, but others countered that it's useful for smaller, local models. The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of local LLMs becoming more accessible and the potential for innovative Vim integrations.
OpenAI has introduced Operator, a large language model designed for tool use. It excels at using tools like search engines, code interpreters, or APIs to respond accurately to user requests, even complex ones involving multiple steps. Operator breaks down tasks, searches for information, and uses tools to gather data and produce high-quality results, marking a significant advance in LLMs' ability to effectively interact with and utilize external resources. This capability makes Operator suitable for practical applications requiring factual accuracy and complex problem-solving.
HN commenters express skepticism about Operator's claimed benefits, questioning its actual usefulness and expressing concerns about the potential for misuse and the propagation of misinformation. Some find the conversational approach gimmicky and prefer traditional command-line interfaces. Others doubt its ability to handle complex tasks effectively and predict its eventual abandonment. The closed-source nature also draws criticism, with some advocating for open alternatives. A few commenters, however, see potential value in specific applications like customer support and internal tooling, or as a learning tool for prompt engineering. There's also discussion about the ethics of using large language models to control other software and the potential deskilling of users.
The author created a system using the open-source large language model, Ollama, to automatically respond to SMS spam messages. Instead of simply blocking the spam, the system engages the spammers in extended, nonsensical, and often humorous conversations generated by the LLM, wasting their time and resources. The goal is to make SMS spam less profitable by increasing the cost of sending messages, ultimately discouraging spammers. The author details the setup process, which involves running Ollama locally, forwarding SMS messages to a server, and using a Python script to interface with the LLM and send replies.
HN users generally praised the project for its creativity and humor. Several commenters shared their own experiences with SMS spam, expressing frustration and a desire for effective countermeasures. Some discussed the ethical implications of engaging with spammers, even with an LLM, and the potential for abuse or unintended consequences. Technical discussion centered around the cost-effectiveness of running such a system, with some suggesting optimizations or alternative approaches like using a less resource-intensive LLM. Others expressed interest in expanding the project to handle different types of spam or integrating it with existing spam-filtering tools. A few users also pointed out potential legal issues, like violating telephone consumer protection laws, depending on the nature of the responses generated by the LLM.
The blog post details the author's successful attempt at getting OpenAI's language model, specifically GPT-3 (codenamed "o1"), to play the board game Codenames. The author found the AI remarkably adept at the game, demonstrating a strong grasp of word association, nuance, and even the ability to provide clues with appropriate "sneekiness" to mislead the opposing team. Through careful prompt engineering and a structured representation of the game state, the AI was able to both give and interpret clues effectively, leading the author to declare it a "super good" Codenames player. The author expresses excitement about the potential for AI in board games and the surprising level of strategic thinking exhibited by the language model.
HN users generally agreed that the demo was impressive, showcasing the model's ability to grasp complex word associations and game mechanics. Some expressed skepticism about whether the AI truly "understood" the game or was simply statistically correlating words, while others praised the author's clever prompting. Several commenters discussed the potential for future AI development in gaming, including personalized difficulty levels and even entirely AI-generated games. One compelling comment highlighted the significant progress in natural language processing, contrasting this demo with previous attempts at AI playing Codenames. Another questioned the fairness of judging the AI based on a single, potentially cherry-picked example, suggesting more rigorous testing is needed. There was also discussion about the ethics of using large language models for entertainment, given their environmental impact and potential societal consequences.
Magenta.nvim is a Neovim plugin designed to enhance coding workflows by leveraging large language models (LLMs) as tools. It emphasizes structured requests and responses, allowing users to define custom tools and workflows for various tasks like generating documentation, refactoring code, and finding bugs. Instead of simply autocompleting code, Magenta focuses on invoking external tools based on user prompts within Neovim, providing more controlled and predictable AI assistance. It supports various LLMs and features asynchronous execution for minimizing disruptions. The plugin prioritizes flexibility and customizability, allowing developers to tailor their AI-powered tools to their specific needs and projects.
Hacker News users generally expressed interest in Magenta.nvim, praising its focus on tool integration and the novel approach of using external tools rather than relying solely on large language models (LLMs). Some commenters compared it favorably to other AI coding assistants, highlighting its potential for more reliable and predictable behavior. Several expressed excitement about the possibilities of tool-based code generation and hoped to see support for additional tools beyond the initial offerings. A few users questioned the reliance on external dependencies and raised concerns about potential complexity and performance overhead. Others pointed out the project's early stage and suggested potential improvements, such as asynchronous execution and better error handling. Overall, the sentiment was positive, with many eager to try the plugin and see its further development.
Tabby is a self-hosted AI coding assistant designed to enhance programming productivity. It offers code completion, generation, translation, explanation, and chat functionality, all within a secure local environment. By leveraging large language models like StarCoder and CodeLlama, Tabby provides powerful assistance without sharing code with external servers. It's designed to be easily installed and customized, offering both a desktop application and a VS Code extension. The project aims to be a flexible and private alternative to cloud-based AI coding tools.
Hacker News users discussed Tabby's potential, limitations, and privacy implications. Some praised its self-hostable nature as a key advantage over cloud-based alternatives like GitHub Copilot, emphasizing data security and cost savings. Others questioned its offline performance compared to online models and expressed skepticism about its ability to truly compete with more established tools. The practicality of self-hosting a large language model (LLM) for individual use was also debated, with some highlighting the resource requirements. Several commenters showed interest in using Tabby for exploring and learning about LLMs, while others were more focused on its potential as a practical coding assistant. Concerns about the computational costs and complexity of setup were common threads. There was also some discussion comparing Tabby to similar projects.
A developer created "Islet", an iOS app designed to simplify diabetes management using GPT-4-Turbo. The app analyzes blood glucose data, meals, and other relevant factors to offer personalized insights and predictions, helping users understand trends and make informed decisions about their diabetes care. It aims to reduce the mental burden of diabetes management by automating tasks like logbook analysis and offering proactive suggestions, ultimately aiming to improve overall health outcomes for users.
HN users generally expressed interest in the Islet diabetes management app and its use of GPT-4. Several questioned the reliance on a closed-source LLM for medical advice, raising concerns about transparency, data privacy, and the potential for hallucinations. Some suggested using open-source models or smaller, specialized models for specific tasks like carb counting. Others were curious about the app's prompt engineering and how it handles edge cases. The developer responded to many comments, clarifying the app's current functionality (primarily focused on logging and analysis, not direct medical advice), their commitment to user privacy, and future plans for open-sourcing parts of the project and exploring alternative LLMs. There was also a discussion about regulatory hurdles for AI-powered medical apps and the importance of clinical trials.
Garak is an open-source tool developed by NVIDIA for identifying vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs). It probes LLMs with a diverse range of prompts designed to elicit problematic behaviors, such as generating harmful content, leaking private information, or being easily jailbroken. These prompts cover various attack categories like prompt injection, data poisoning, and bias detection. Garak aims to help developers understand and mitigate these risks, ultimately making LLMs safer and more robust. It provides a framework for automated testing and evaluation, allowing researchers and developers to proactively assess LLM security and identify potential weaknesses before deployment.
Hacker News commenters discuss Garak's potential usefulness while acknowledging its limitations. Some express skepticism about the effectiveness of LLMs scanning other LLMs for vulnerabilities, citing the inherent difficulty in defining and detecting such issues. Others see value in Garak as a tool for identifying potential problems, especially in specific domains like prompt injection. The limited scope of the current version is noted, with users hoping for future expansion to cover more vulnerabilities and models. Several commenters highlight the rapid pace of development in this space, suggesting Garak represents an early but important step towards more robust LLM security. The "arms race" analogy between developing secure LLMs and finding vulnerabilities is also mentioned.
Summary of Comments ( 21 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43039308
Hacker News users discussed Phind 2's potential, expressing both excitement and skepticism. Some praised its ability to synthesize information and provide visual aids, especially for coding-related queries. Others questioned the reliability of its multi-step reasoning and cited instances where it hallucinated or provided incorrect code. Concerns were also raised about the lack of source citations and the potential for over-reliance on AI tools, hindering deeper learning. Several users compared it favorably to other AI search engines like Perplexity AI, noting its cleaner interface and improved code generation capabilities. The closed-source nature of Phind 2 also drew criticism, with some advocating for open-source alternatives. The pricing model and potential for future monetization were also points of discussion.
The Hacker News post titled "Phind 2: AI search with visual answers and multi-step reasoning" generated a significant discussion with a variety of comments. Several users focused on the apparent improvements in Phind's ability to handle complex, multi-step reasoning problems, often comparing it favorably to other search engines and AI chatbots like Google, Bing, and ChatGPT. Some users shared specific examples of queries where Phind excelled, demonstrating its capacity for coding tasks, explanations of complex topics, and providing visual aids.
A prominent theme in the comments was the perceived superiority of Phind's coding-related capabilities. Users reported that Phind could generate, debug, and explain code more effectively than alternatives. This led to speculation about the underlying model and training data used by Phind, with some suggesting a heavier emphasis on code compared to other models.
Several commenters discussed the potential impact of tools like Phind on the future of search and software development. Some envisioned a shift away from traditional search engines toward AI-powered tools that offer more comprehensive and interactive answers. Others discussed the implications for programmers, suggesting that these tools could automate certain coding tasks, increasing productivity and potentially changing the nature of software development work.
The quality of Phind's visual answers was also a topic of conversation. Users appreciated the inclusion of diagrams and visuals, finding them helpful for understanding complex information. However, there were also mentions of occasional inaccuracies or limitations in the visuals, indicating that this aspect of Phind is still under development.
While many praised Phind 2, some commenters expressed caution and skepticism. Some questioned the long-term viability of the platform, mentioning the high computational costs associated with running such a powerful AI model. Others raised concerns about the potential for bias in the answers and the need for transparency in the underlying workings of the system. The discussion also touched on the broader societal implications of advanced AI, including the potential for job displacement and the importance of responsible development and deployment of these technologies.
Finally, some users shared their personal experiences with Phind, offering anecdotal evidence of its usefulness for various tasks. These personal accounts provided valuable insights into the practical applications of the tool and contributed to a more nuanced understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the comments reflected a mixture of excitement, curiosity, and caution about the potential of Phind 2 and the broader implications of advancements in AI-powered search.