A Duke University student, Dumpster Diving Freegan, documented their finds after scavenging discarded items from student move-out. They salvaged an estimated $6,000 worth of furniture, electronics, clothes, and other luxury goods, including a working MacBook, a mini-fridge, and designer clothing. The student highlighted the excessive waste generated by affluent students and questioned the consumer culture that leads to perfectly usable items being thrown away. They plan to donate some items and keep others.
Tangier Island, a small, eroding island in Virginia's Chesapeake Bay, is home to a unique dialect preserved from the 17th century, when settlers from southwest England arrived. This dialect, with its distinctive pronunciation and vocabulary, retains echoes of Elizabethan English, offering a fascinating glimpse into the past. Islanders, largely isolated due to their geographical location and traditional fishing-based economy, have inadvertently maintained this linguistic time capsule, though the island's very existence is threatened by rising sea levels.
Hacker News commenters discuss the BBC article about Tangier Island's unique dialect. Several point out that the dialect isn't truly Elizabethan English, but rather a mix of influences including early colonial English and Cornish, shaped by the island's isolation. Some debate the level of Cornish influence and the accuracy of the "Elizabethan" label. Others discuss the impact of rising sea levels and the islanders' resistance to climate change science, attributing it to religious beliefs and economic dependence on crabbing. A few commenters share personal anecdotes or express interest in visiting. The thread also touches on linguistic preservation, the challenges faced by small island communities, and the role of dialect in shaping identity. One compelling exchange revolves around the island's uncertain future and the potential loss of this unique dialect as residents are forced to relocate.
Summary of Comments ( 204 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44108207
HN commenters were largely unimpressed with the "luxury" items salvaged, questioning their actual value and the legality of taking discarded items from private property. Several pointed out that taking trash from dumpsters on private property, especially in multi-unit dwellings like dorms, is often illegal and could be considered theft. Others debated the ethics of profiting from student waste, with some suggesting the practice is exploitative while others argued students are responsible for their own discarded possessions. A few commenters expressed skepticism about the $6,000 valuation, suggesting the "luxury" label was exaggerated. There was also discussion about the broader issue of student consumerism and wastefulness, with some suggesting universities could do more to promote sustainable practices.
The Hacker News post discussing the Indy Week article about Duke students dumpster diving has generated a significant number of comments. Many commenters express skepticism about the claimed $6,000 valuation of the salvaged goods, suggesting it's significantly inflated. Several users question the legality and ethics of dumpster diving, particularly on private property, with some citing potential health and safety concerns.
A recurring theme is the perceived wasteful nature of affluent students and the broader societal implications of consumerism and disposable culture. Some commenters draw parallels to the phenomenon of "freegans," individuals who reclaim and consume discarded food and other items as a lifestyle choice. Others discuss the potential for similar waste at other universities and within different demographics.
Several commenters share anecdotes of their own experiences with dumpster diving or finding discarded items of value. Some offer practical tips for safe and effective dumpster diving, while others debate the legal and ethical considerations. A few comments delve into the psychology of discarding valuable items, speculating on the reasons why students might throw away seemingly usable goods.
The legality of dumpster diving on private property is a point of contention, with some commenters asserting that it's generally illegal while others argue that it depends on local ordinances and the specific circumstances. The issue of potential liability for injuries sustained while dumpster diving is also raised.
Some commenters express concern about the potential for harassment or conflict with property owners or law enforcement, advising caution and discretion. Others suggest alternative approaches to acquiring discarded items, such as contacting university departments or student groups directly to inquire about unwanted goods.
A few commenters criticize the article and the student's actions, characterizing them as opportunistic or exploitative. However, many others express empathy for students struggling with financial constraints and see dumpster diving as a resourceful way to acquire needed items.
Overall, the comments reflect a wide range of perspectives on dumpster diving, encompassing ethical, legal, practical, and societal considerations. The discussion highlights the complex interplay of wastefulness, resourcefulness, and the challenges faced by students in a consumer-driven society.