A 7.7 magnitude earthquake struck Southeast Asia, specifically the Myanmar-Thailand border region, on September 24, 2024. Initial reports indicated shaking felt across a wide area, including Bangkok, Thailand. The earthquake's depth was relatively shallow, raising concerns about potential damage. Specific details about the impact were still emerging at the time of the report.
Analysis of a victim's remains from Herculaneum, a town destroyed by the Vesuvius eruption in 79 AD, revealed that the extreme heat of the pyroclastic flow vitrified the victim's brain tissue, turning it into a glassy substance. This is the first time this phenomenon has been observed in archaeological remains. The victim, believed to be a man in his 20s, was found lying face down on a wooden bed, likely killed instantly by the intense heat. The glassy material found in his skull, analyzed to be mostly fatty acids and human brain proteins, provides unique insight into the extreme temperatures reached during the eruption and their effects on human tissue.
HN commenters discuss the plausibility of the victim's brain vitrifying, with several expressing skepticism due to the required temperatures and rapid cooling. Some point out that other organic materials like wood don't typically vitrify in these circumstances, and question the lack of similar findings in other Vesuvius victims. One commenter with experience in glass production notes the differences between natural glass formation (like obsidian) and the creation of glass from organic matter. Others discuss the ethics of displaying human remains and the potential for further research to confirm or refute the vitrification claim. Some commenters also highlight the gruesome yet fascinating nature of the discovery and the unique glimpse it provides into the destruction of Pompeii.
Summary of Comments ( 72 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43503265
HN commenters discuss the earthquake's impact, focusing on the lack of widespread information due to Myanmar's political situation and limited internet access. Some express concern about the potential for significant damage and casualties in Myanmar, given the country's vulnerability and the difficulty in getting aid. Others mention feeling the tremor in Bangkok, Thailand, and the general rarity of noticeable earthquakes in the region. Several commenters share resources for tracking earthquake activity and discuss the geological context of the event. The lack of immediate reports from inside Myanmar is highlighted as a major source of worry.
The Hacker News post titled "7.7 magnitude earthquake hits Southeast Asia, affecting Myanmar and Thailand" has a modest number of comments, primarily focused on the surprising lack of widespread damage and casualties given the earthquake's significant magnitude.
Several commenters discuss the apparent effectiveness of earthquake-resistant building codes and practices in Thailand, speculating that this contributed to the relatively low impact. One commenter highlights the role of building materials, noting that lighter materials like wood and bamboo, commonly used in the affected region, can perform better in earthquakes than heavier concrete structures, particularly those not built to code. This observation sparks a small discussion about the trade-offs between different building materials and their suitability in earthquake-prone areas.
Another commenter questions the initial magnitude estimate of 7.7, pointing to subsequent revisions by the USGS that downgraded the earthquake to a 7.0. This raises the point that preliminary magnitude estimations can be subject to change as more data becomes available. The discussion around this highlights the complexities of accurately measuring earthquake magnitudes in real-time.
One commenter shares a personal anecdote about experiencing a similar-sized earthquake in San Francisco and contrasts the relatively minor damage in Thailand with the potential for more significant damage in a densely populated urban area like San Francisco. This emphasizes the role of population density and infrastructure vulnerability in determining the overall impact of an earthquake.
Finally, a few commenters express relief at the limited damage and casualties reported, acknowledging the potential for a much more devastating outcome. One commenter mentions the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami as a sobering reminder of the destructive power of large seismic events in the region.
Overall, the comment section reflects a combination of surprise at the low casualty count, cautious optimism about the effectiveness of building practices, and a recognition of the inherent uncertainties and potential dangers associated with large earthquakes. The discussion remains factual and avoids speculation beyond the observations about building materials and the revised magnitude.