Japanese scientists have developed a new type of plastic that dissolves completely in seawater within a matter of hours, leaving no harmful microplastics behind. This biodegradable plastic, made from cellulose nanofibers and a bio-based polymer, disintegrates rapidly in alkaline conditions similar to ocean water, offering a potential solution to plastic pollution. Unlike conventional biodegradable plastics that require high temperatures for composting, this new material breaks down in regular seawater, making it suitable for a wider range of applications.
The Guardian article argues that the dominant "fossils" of the Anthropocene era will not be large skeletons, but rather "technofossils"—persistent manufactured materials like plastics, concrete, and even fast fashion. These materials, produced and discarded in massive quantities, will be preserved in the geological record for millions of years, offering future civilizations a stark depiction of human activity. The article highlights the proliferation of plastic bags, cheap clothing fibers, and even altered chicken bones (due to industrial farming practices) as prime examples of this enduring legacy, painting a picture of a planet profoundly reshaped by human consumption.
HN commenters largely discussed the permanence of human-created materials like plastics and concrete, with some expressing cynicism about humanity's legacy being trash. Several debated the geological significance of these "technofossils," arguing whether they truly constitute a new epoch marker. Some highlighted the potential for future civilizations to misunderstand these remnants, drawing parallels to how we interpret past civilizations. Others pointed out the irony of cheap, mass-produced items becoming long-lasting markers of our era, while more intentionally preserved artifacts might decay. A few comments also touched on the potential for future recycling or repurposing of these materials, questioning the "eternal" aspect of the headline.
Summary of Comments ( 35 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43505626
Hacker News commenters express skepticism about the new plastic's viability. Several question the practicality of a material that dissolves in seawater for applications like fishing nets, given the constant exposure to saltwater. Others raise concerns about the potential for accidental dissolution due to rain or humidity, and the lack of clarity regarding the byproducts of the dissolving process and their environmental impact. Some doubt the feasibility of large-scale production and cost-effectiveness, while others point out the existing problem of managing plastic waste already in the ocean, suggesting that focusing on biodegradable plastics might be a better long-term solution. There's also discussion about the ambiguity of the term "dissolves" and the need for more rigorous scientific data before drawing conclusions about its effectiveness. Finally, some suggest alternative uses for this type of plastic, such as dissolvable sutures or temporary structures.
The Hacker News post titled "Japanese scientists create new plastic that dissolves in seawater overnight" generated a significant discussion with a variety of comments. Many users expressed skepticism and raised critical questions about the practicality and potential environmental impact of this new plastic.
Several commenters questioned the actual breakdown products of the plastic and whether it truly dissolves or simply breaks down into microplastics, which could be even more harmful to the marine environment. They pointed out that the article lacks crucial details on the chemical composition of the byproducts and the specific mechanisms of degradation. Some users suggested that the term "dissolves" might be misleading and requested further scientific evidence to support the claim.
The feasibility of using this plastic for real-world applications was another major point of contention. Commenters highlighted the challenges of manufacturing and handling a material that is so readily soluble in saltwater. They raised concerns about its durability and suitability for packaging and other common plastic uses, especially given the presence of humidity and moisture in many environments. Questions were also raised regarding the cost-effectiveness of producing this new plastic compared to existing alternatives.
Some users expressed concerns about the potential for accidental dissolution and the implications for waste management. They questioned how this plastic would be handled in recycling systems and whether it could contaminate other materials.
A few commenters also touched upon the broader issue of plastic pollution and questioned whether this new material is a genuine solution or merely a distraction from the need to reduce plastic consumption. They argued that focusing on biodegradable plastics might discourage efforts to develop more sustainable practices and reduce overall plastic usage.
While some comments expressed cautious optimism about the potential benefits of this new plastic, the overall sentiment reflected a healthy dose of skepticism and a demand for more concrete scientific data before drawing any firm conclusions. Many users called for further research and independent verification of the claims made in the article.