Xan is a command-line tool designed for efficient manipulation of CSV and tabular data. It focuses on speed and simplicity, leveraging Rust's performance for tasks like searching, filtering, transforming, and aggregating. Xan aims to be a modern alternative to traditional tools like awk and sed, offering a more intuitive syntax specifically geared toward working with structured data in a terminal environment. Its features include column selection, filtering based on various criteria, data type conversion, statistical computations, and outputting in various formats, including JSON.
Nebu is a minimalist spreadsheet editor designed for Varvara, a unique computer system. It focuses on simplicity and efficiency, utilizing a keyboard-driven interface with limited mouse interaction. Features include basic spreadsheet operations like calculations, cell formatting, and navigation. Nebu embraces a "less is more" philosophy, aiming to provide a distraction-free environment for working with numerical data within the constraints of Varvara's hardware and software ecosystem. It prioritizes performance and responsiveness over complex features, striving for a smooth and intuitive user experience.
Hacker News users discuss Nebu, a spreadsheet editor designed for the Varvara computer. Several commenters express interest in the project, particularly its minimalist aesthetic and novel approach to spreadsheet interaction. Some question the practicality and target audience, given Varvara's niche status. There's discussion about the potential benefits of a simplified interface and the limitations of traditional spreadsheet software. A few users compare Nebu to other minimalist or unconventional spreadsheet tools and speculate about its potential for broader adoption. Several also inquire about the specifics of its implementation and integration with Varvara's unique operating system. Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of curiosity, skepticism, and cautious optimism about Nebu's potential.
mdq is a command-line tool, inspired by jq, that allows users to process and manipulate Markdown files using CSS-like selectors. It can extract specific elements from Markdown, such as headings, paragraphs, or code blocks, and output them in various formats, including Markdown, HTML, and text. This facilitates tasks like extracting specific sections of a document, reformatting content, and generating summaries, offering a powerful way to automate Markdown workflows.
Hacker News users generally praised mdq
for its potential usefulness, comparing it favorably to jq
for JSON. Several commenters expressed interest in using it for tasks like extracting links or reformatting Markdown files. Some suggested improvements, such as adding support for YAML frontmatter and improving error handling. Others highlighted the complexities of parsing Markdown reliably due to its flexible nature and the potential challenges of handling variations and edge cases. One user pointed out the limitations of existing markdown parsers and the difficulties in accurately representing markdown as a data structure, while another cautioned against over-engineering the tool for simple tasks that could be accomplished with grep
, sed
, or awk
.
Summary of Comments ( 23 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43494894
Hacker News users discuss XAN's potential, particularly its speed and ease of use for data manipulation tasks compared to traditional tools like
awk
andsed
. Some express excitement about its CSV parsing capabilities and the ability to leverage Python's power. Concerns are raised regarding the dependency on Python, potential performance bottlenecks, and the limited feature set compared to more established data wrangling tools like Pandas. The discussion also touches upon the project's early stage of development, with some users interested in contributing and others suggesting potential improvements like better documentation and integration with other command-line tools. Several comments compare XAN favorably to other similar tools likejq
andmiller
, emphasizing its niche in CSV manipulation.The Hacker News post titled "XAN: A Modern CSV-Centric Data Manipulation Toolkit for the Terminal" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43494894) has generated several comments discussing the merits and potential drawbacks of the XAN tool.
Several commenters express enthusiasm for XAN, praising its seemingly intuitive syntax and potential for simplifying common data manipulation tasks. One commenter highlights the apparent ease of use, suggesting it could be a more accessible alternative to more complex command-line tools like
awk
orjq
. Another appreciates its CSV-centric approach, noting that CSV is a ubiquitous format and a tool specifically designed for it could be quite useful. The ability to perform calculations and filtering within XAN is also mentioned as a positive feature.However, other comments raise concerns and offer alternative perspectives. Some users question the need for another specialized tool when existing solutions like
awk
,jq
, Miller,xsv
, and Python'spandas
library already provide similar functionality. They argue that learning yet another tool might not be worthwhile, especially if the existing tools can accomplish the same tasks with comparable or even greater flexibility. The "not invented here" syndrome is also mentioned in this context.One commenter specifically mentions the power and versatility of
jq
, emphasizing its ability to handle various data formats beyond CSV, including JSON, and its extensive feature set. They suggest thatjq
might be a more robust solution for those working with diverse data types.Another point of discussion revolves around the choice of Rust as the implementation language for XAN. While some applaud the use of Rust for its performance characteristics, others question whether its complexity might make contributing to the project more challenging. There's also a brief discussion about the potential overhead associated with Rust and whether it's significant enough to outweigh its benefits in this specific use case.
Finally, some commenters express interest in trying out XAN and exploring its capabilities firsthand, while others remain skeptical but acknowledge its potential. The overall sentiment seems to be one of cautious curiosity, with some users excited about the prospect of a new CSV-centric tool but others remaining unconvinced of its necessity given the existing alternatives.