Brother is facing accusations of using firmware updates to lock out third-party ink cartridges in some of their printers. The updates reportedly disable functionality for these cheaper alternatives, forcing users to buy more expensive Brother-branded ink. Further fueling the controversy, Brother has allegedly removed older firmware versions from their support website, preventing users from downgrading and regaining compatibility with third-party cartridges. This effectively traps users with the update and limits their ink choices.
Right to Repair legislation has now been introduced in all 50 US states, marking a significant milestone for the movement. While no state has yet passed a comprehensive law covering all product categories, the widespread introduction of bills signifies growing momentum. These bills aim to compel manufacturers to provide consumers and independent repair shops with the necessary information, tools, and parts to fix their own devices, from electronics and appliances to agricultural equipment. This push for repairability aims to reduce electronic waste, empower consumers, and foster competition in the repair market. Though the fight is far from over, with various industries lobbying against the bills, the nationwide reach of these legislative efforts represents substantial progress.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed support for Right to Repair legislation, viewing it as a win for consumers, small businesses, and the environment. Some highlighted the absurdity of manufacturers restricting access to repair information and parts, forcing consumers into expensive authorized repairs or planned obsolescence. Several pointed out the automotive industry's existing right to repair as a successful precedent. Concerns were raised about the potential for watered-down legislation through lobbying efforts and the need for continued vigilance. A few commenters discussed the potential impact on security and safety if unqualified individuals attempt repairs, but the overall sentiment leaned heavily in favor of the right to repair movement's progress.
People without smartphones face increasing disadvantages in daily life as essential services like banking, healthcare, and parking increasingly rely on app-based access. Campaigners argue this digital exclusion unfairly penalizes vulnerable groups, including the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals who may not be able to afford or operate a smartphone. This "app tyranny" limits access to basic services, creating a two-tiered system and exacerbating existing inequalities. They call for alternative access options to ensure inclusivity and prevent further marginalization of those without smartphones.
Hacker News commenters largely agree that over-reliance on smartphones creates unfair disadvantages for those without them, particularly regarding essential services and accessibility. Several point out the increasing difficulty of accessing healthcare, banking, and government services without a smartphone. Some commenters suggest this trend is driven by cost-cutting measures disguised as "convenience" and highlight the digital divide's impact on vulnerable populations. Others discuss the privacy implications of mandatory app usage and the lack of viable alternatives for those who prefer not to use smartphones. A few argue that while some inconvenience is inevitable with technological advancement, essential services should offer alternative access methods. The lack of meaningful competition in the mobile OS market is also mentioned as a contributing factor to the problem.
Summary of Comments ( 274 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43261933
Hacker News commenters generally express cynicism and frustration with Brother's alleged firmware update tactic. Many see it as a predictable anti-competitive move designed to force customers into buying expensive proprietary ink cartridges. Some commenters share personal anecdotes of similar experiences with Brother and other printer manufacturers, reinforcing the perception of planned obsolescence and vendor lock-in. Several suggest that this practice further incentivizes exploring alternative printing solutions, including continuous ink systems (CIS) or different printer brands altogether. A few users offer technical insights, speculating on the methods Brother might be using to block third-party cartridges and discussing potential workarounds. Some also debate the legality and ethics of such practices.
The Hacker News post titled "Brother accused of locking down third-party printer ink cartridges" generated a moderate discussion with several commenters expressing their frustration and sharing similar experiences. A common theme throughout the comments is the perception that Brother, along with other printer manufacturers, employs tactics to restrict the use of third-party ink cartridges, ultimately driving up costs for consumers.
Several users recounted instances where firmware updates seemed specifically designed to disable previously functional third-party cartridges. One commenter described a situation where their perfectly good third-party cartridges were rendered unusable after an update, forcing them to purchase more expensive Brother-branded ink. This sentiment was echoed by others who felt trapped in a cycle of forced upgrades and expensive consumables.
Some users discussed the technical aspects of these lockouts, mentioning techniques like checking cartridge chip IDs and implementing DRM-like measures. One commenter speculated about the use of cryptographic signing for cartridges, making it more difficult for third-party manufacturers to bypass the restrictions. Another discussed the legal implications of these practices, referencing right-to-repair arguments and questioning the legality of intentionally bricking compatible hardware.
The ethics of planned obsolescence were also a topic of discussion. Commenters criticized printer manufacturers for prioritizing profit over customer satisfaction and environmental responsibility. The argument was made that these practices encourage unnecessary waste and contribute to the growing problem of e-waste.
A few commenters offered potential solutions and workarounds. Some suggested using older printer models that are less susceptible to these restrictions or exploring open-source firmware alternatives, though the availability and practicality of these options were debated. Others advocated for consumer pressure and regulatory action to address these practices.
While not a dominant viewpoint, some commenters offered counterarguments or alternative perspectives. One user suggested that the firmware updates might genuinely be for security or performance improvements, and the cartridge lockouts could be an unintended consequence. Another pointed out the research and development costs associated with printer manufacturing, suggesting that the higher price of branded ink could be justified.
Overall, the comments on Hacker News predominantly reflect a negative sentiment toward Brother's practices, with many users expressing frustration and concern about the increasing difficulty and cost of using third-party ink cartridges. The discussion highlights the ongoing tension between manufacturers seeking to control their products and consumers seeking affordable and flexible options.