Standard Ebooks produces free, high-quality ebooks for readers. They meticulously format and proofread public domain texts, creating beautifully typeset, accessible editions optimized for various e-readers. Their goal is to liberate classic literature from inconsistent and often poorly formatted digital versions, offering a superior reading experience akin to well-crafted print books, while also respecting the author's original intent. They encourage community involvement through contributions like proofreading and cover art.
The IndieWeb is a community and movement focused on reclaiming ownership and control of your online identity and content by building and using personal websites. It emphasizes using open web standards and technologies to connect your site to the broader web, allowing for independent publishing, sharing, and interaction without relying on centralized platforms. This approach promotes personal expression, data portability, and interconnectedness through a variety of tools and philosophies, empowering individuals to own their online presence.
Hacker News users discussed the merits and challenges of the IndieWeb, prompted by a blog post aggregator. Several commenters expressed appreciation for the concept of owning your own content and controlling your online presence. Some highlighted the technical hurdles and time commitment involved in setting up and maintaining an IndieWeb site, contrasting it with the ease of use of mainstream platforms. Others debated the discoverability of IndieWeb content and whether its decentralized nature hinders its growth. The conversation also touched upon the tension between the IndieWeb's philosophy and the network effects of larger platforms, along with the potential for bridging the gap between the two. A few users shared their personal experiences with the IndieWeb, both positive and negative. The overall sentiment leaned towards cautious optimism, acknowledging the IndieWeb's ideals while recognizing the practical obstacles to widespread adoption.
Summary of Comments ( 73 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43599637
Hacker News users generally praised Standard Ebooks' mission and quality. Several commenters appreciated the attention to detail and craftsmanship applied to the ebook formatting, contrasting it favorably with the often poor quality of commercially available ebooks. Some users highlighted the value of well-formatted ebooks for visually impaired readers using screen readers. A few commenters questioned the long-term viability of relying on donations and volunteered labor, while others suggested potential business models like a Patreon or selling curated collections. The DRM-free nature of the ebooks and the project's commitment to open standards were also commended. A minor point of contention was the choice of fonts, with some expressing preferences for alternatives.
The Hacker News post titled "Standard Ebooks: liberated ebooks, carefully produced for the true book lover" generated a substantial discussion with a variety of viewpoints on the project.
Several commenters expressed strong support for Standard Ebooks and its mission. They praised the high quality of the ebook production, emphasizing the careful attention to detail and the focus on creating a pleasant reading experience. Some specifically highlighted the value of well-formatted ebooks, contrasting them with the often poorly formatted versions available elsewhere. The project's commitment to open standards and public domain works also resonated with many, who viewed it as a valuable contribution to the literary landscape. A few commenters even shared their personal experiences using and enjoying Standard Ebooks, further reinforcing the positive sentiment.
However, some commenters also expressed reservations and criticisms. One recurring theme was the limited selection of books available, given the focus on public domain works. Some users wished for a wider range of titles, including contemporary works. There were also discussions about the project's reliance on donations and the potential challenges of sustaining such a model in the long term. A few commenters questioned the practical necessity of the project, arguing that existing ebook formats and sources were sufficient. There was also a minor debate about specific formatting choices made by Standard Ebooks, highlighting the subjective nature of reading preferences.
Beyond these main points, some commenters offered suggestions for improving the project, such as expanding the catalog, implementing different features, and exploring alternative funding models. Others shared links to similar projects or resources, contributing to a broader conversation about ebook formatting and accessibility. Overall, the comments section reflected a mixture of enthusiasm, skepticism, and constructive feedback, typical of discussions on Hacker News concerning new projects and initiatives.