In 1964, Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges met Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, at a symposium. Borges, initially skeptical and even dismissive of the field, viewing machines as incapable of true creativity, engaged in a lively debate with Minsky. This encounter exposed a clash between Borges's humanistic, literary perspective, rooted in symbolism and metaphor, and Minsky's scientific, computational approach. While Borges saw literature as inherently human, Minsky believed machines could eventually replicate and even surpass human intellectual abilities, including writing. The meeting highlighted fundamental differences in how they viewed the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and creativity.
Henri Bergson's philosophy, as explored in Mark Sinclair's biography, resonates with today's anxieties about an uncertain future. Bergson emphasized "duration," subjective, flowing time as opposed to the fixed, measurable time of science. He believed free will and genuine novelty are possible due to this unpredictable flow. His work challenged deterministic views of the universe and championed intuition as a vital tool for understanding reality, distinct from intellect, which dissects and analyzes. Bergson viewed life as a continuous creative process, an "élan vital" driving evolution and constantly generating unpredictable new forms. His ideas, though less prominent today, offer a framework for navigating a world defined by change and uncertainty, reminding us that the future remains unwritten.
Hacker News users discuss the relevance of Bergson's philosophy in the context of the linked article. Several commenters appreciate the introduction to Bergson, finding his ideas about time, intuition, and experience resonating with current discussions around technology, artificial intelligence, and the limitations of purely mechanistic worldviews. Some point out the influence Bergson had on other thinkers, including Deleuze. Others express skepticism about the practicality or clarity of Bergson's concepts, questioning whether his philosophy offers concrete solutions or simply restates complex problems in abstract terms. A few recommend specific books for further exploration of Bergson's work, including Creative Evolution and Matter and Memory. There's also a brief discussion about the challenges of translating philosophical texts and the potential for misinterpretations.
Summary of Comments ( 48 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43559122
HN commenters generally enjoyed the anecdote about Borges' encounter with McCulloch, finding it charming and insightful. Several appreciated the connection drawn between Borges' fictional worlds and the burgeoning field of AI, particularly the discussion of symbolic representation and the limitations of formal systems. Some highlighted Borges' skepticism towards reducing consciousness to mere computation, echoing his literary themes. A few commenters provided additional context about McCulloch's work and personality, while others offered further reading suggestions on related topics like cybernetics and the history of AI. One commenter noted the irony of Borges, known for his love of libraries, being introduced to the future of information processing.
The Hacker News post titled "When Jorge Luis Borges met one of the founders of AI," linking to an article on Res Obscura about Borges' encounter with Marvin Minsky, generated a moderate amount of discussion with 17 comments. Several commenters focused on the philosophical implications of Borges' fiction and its relevance to AI.
One commenter highlighted the cyclical nature of intellectual history, pointing out how Borges' work, though predating modern AI, explores themes now central to the field. They noted the irony of Borges, a writer fascinated by infinite libraries and labyrinths, influencing the development of a technology now grappling with similar concepts of vast data and complex systems. This commenter sees a beautiful, albeit potentially unsettling, circularity in how literature anticipates and shapes scientific pursuits.
Another commenter explored the intersection of Borges' literary devices, like the "Aleph," and the potential of AI. They suggested that Borges' fictional constructs, which represent totality and infinite information, might serve as thought experiments for understanding the implications of increasingly powerful AI. They wondered if the challenges and paradoxes Borges explored through these devices could offer insights into the limitations and dangers of pursuing unbounded knowledge and computational power.
A third commenter delved deeper into Borges' specific concerns, suggesting his skepticism toward AI wasn't about technological limitations, but rather the inherent human limitations in interpreting vast amounts of information. They argued that Borges foresaw the issue of information overload and the difficulty of extracting meaning from an overwhelming deluge of data, a problem that remains central to AI research today.
Several other comments were shorter and offered ancillary observations. Some mentioned other science fiction authors who explored similar themes, while others simply expressed appreciation for the article and the connection it drew between Borges and AI. One commenter briefly mentioned Borges' story "The Library of Babel" as a direct influence on the field of information retrieval.
Overall, the comments reflect an appreciation for Borges' foresight and the continued relevance of his work in the age of AI. The discussion centered around the philosophical and epistemological challenges posed by both Borges' fiction and the advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly regarding the nature of knowledge, information, and human understanding.