Researchers believe they may have discovered a network of tunnels beneath Milan's Sforza Castle, potentially matching sketches made by Leonardo da Vinci during his time as a court engineer there in the late 15th century. Using ground-penetrating radar and archive research, the team identified several underground passages and chambers consistent with da Vinci's drawings, suggesting he may have played a larger role in the castle's design and construction than previously thought. Further investigation is needed to confirm the tunnels' connection to da Vinci, but the discovery offers a tantalizing glimpse into the artist's diverse talents and the castle's complex history.
The death of TSR in 1997, while seemingly a blow to computer RPGs, actually cleared the way for a new era of CRPG innovation. No longer constrained by TSR's often restrictive licensing practices and focus on D&D, developers were free to explore original settings, mechanics, and stories. This paved the way for titles like Planescape: Torment and Fallout, which diverged significantly from established D&D tropes and helped redefine the genre. The removal of TSR as a gatekeeper allowed for greater experimentation and ultimately fostered the growth and diversification of the CRPG landscape.
Hacker News users discuss the decline of TSR and the rise of indie CRPGs. Several commenters express nostalgia for older D&D editions, lamenting the perceived shift in focus from gameplay and world-building to brand management and monetization under Wizards of the Coast. Some discuss the impact of the Open Gaming License (OGL) and its various iterations on the CRPG landscape, with some praising its role in fostering creativity and others expressing concern about its potential misuse. The conversation also touches upon the evolution of CRPG design, including the rise of real-time combat and the influence of games like Baldur's Gate and Diablo. Several commenters recommend specific indie CRPGs, reflecting a broader appreciation for the innovation occurring outside of the mainstream.
Summary of Comments ( 33 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43289774
Hacker News users discuss the discovery of tunnels potentially matching Leonardo da Vinci's sketches, expressing skepticism about the novelty. Several commenters point out that the tunnels have been known for a long time, even suggesting they've personally toured them. Some doubt da Vinci's direct involvement, proposing the tunnels pre-dated him and were simply documented in his drawings. Others question the CNN article's framing, suggesting it oversells a relatively mundane finding for clicks. A few users offer alternative theories about the tunnels' purpose, including water management or escape routes. Overall, the prevailing sentiment is one of mild disappointment, with commenters finding the "discovery" less exciting than the headline implies.
The Hacker News post "Mysterious tunnels sketched by Leonardo may have been found" (linking to a CNN article about possible discovery of tunnels beneath Sforza Castle in Milan that Leonardo da Vinci may have documented) generated several comments.
Many commenters focused on the lack of strong evidence connecting the discovered tunnels to da Vinci. Several pointed out the article's wording is suggestive but lacks definitive proof, using phrases like "may have explored" and "believed to be." One commenter highlighted the frequent rediscovery of tunnels and similar structures, suggesting this find may not be as unique or directly linked to da Vinci as the headline implies. Skepticism about the CNN article's framing was a recurring theme.
Several commenters discussed the nature and purpose of such tunnels. Some suggested their primary function would have been defensive or for escape, while others posited they might have served more mundane purposes like sewage or water management. One commenter, drawing on personal experience living near castles, noted the prevalence of underground structures and their multifaceted uses throughout history.
A few commenters expressed fascination with the potential connection to da Vinci and the historical context of the Sforza Castle, showing an interest in learning more about the period and da Vinci's involvement with the castle. However, even these comments were tempered by the general skepticism regarding the article's claim.
At least one commenter provided additional information about the Sforza Castle and its history, offering a broader context for the discovery.
While there's a sense of excitement and curiosity regarding the discovered tunnels, the prevailing sentiment in the comments is one of cautious skepticism. The commenters largely agree that the article oversells the connection to da Vinci and that more evidence is needed to definitively link him to these particular tunnels.