The <select> element, long a styling holdout, is finally getting much-needed CSS customization capabilities in Chromium-based browsers. Developers can now style aspects like the dropdown arrow (using appearance: none and pseudo-elements), open state, and even the listbox itself, offering greater control over its visual presentation. This enables better integration with overall site design and improved user experience without resorting to JavaScript workarounds or custom elements. While some pseudo-elements are browser-prefixed, the changes pave the way for more consistently styled and accessible dropdown menus across the web.
The Chrome team is working towards enabling customization of the <select> element using the new <selectmenu> element. This upcoming feature allows developers to replace the browser's default dropdown styling with custom HTML, offering greater flexibility and control over the appearance and functionality of dropdown menus. Developers will be able to integrate richer interactions, accessibility features, and more complex layouts within the select element, all while preserving the semantic meaning and native behavior like keyboard navigation and screen reader compatibility. This enhancement aims to address the longstanding developer pain point of limited styling options for the <select> element, opening up opportunities for more visually appealing and user-friendly form controls.
Hacker News users generally expressed frustration with the <select> element's historical limitations and welcomed the proposed changes for customization. Several commenters pointed out the difficulties in styling <select> cross-browser, leading to reliance on JavaScript workarounds and libraries like Choices.js. Some expressed skepticism about the proposed solution's complexity and potential performance impact, suggesting simpler alternatives like allowing shadow DOM styling. Others questioned the need for such extensive customization, arguing for consistency and accessibility over visual flair. A few users highlighted specific use cases, such as multi-select with custom item rendering, where the proposed changes would be beneficial. Overall, the sentiment leans towards cautious optimism, acknowledging the potential improvements while remaining wary of potential drawbacks.
Summary of Comments ( 42 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43532830
Hacker News users generally expressed cautious optimism about the ability to finally style
<select>elements with CSS. Several pointed out that this has been a long-requested feature and lamented the previous difficulty in customizing dropdowns. Some praised the detailed explanation in the blog post, while others worried about browser compatibility and the potential for inconsistencies across different implementations. A few users discussed specific styling challenges they'd encountered, like styling the dropdown arrow or achieving consistent behavior across operating systems. There was some concern about the potential for developers to create confusing or inaccessible custom selects, but also acknowledgment that the feature offers powerful new design possibilities.The Hacker News post "The
<select>element can now be customized with CSS" linking to a Chrome developer blog post has generated a number of comments discussing the implications of this change.Several commenters express cautious optimism. While acknowledging that increased customizability is generally good, they point out the historical difficulties and inconsistencies across browsers in styling
<select>elements. Some express concern that this new ability, while welcome, might lead to developers creating inconsistent or poor user experiences by over-styling the element and deviating too far from established platform conventions. They argue that the default select element, while visually simple, offers a familiar and predictable user experience, and excessive customization could compromise usability.One commenter highlights the specific challenges of creating accessible custom select elements, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that custom styles don't negatively impact keyboard navigation or screen reader compatibility. They suggest that developers should carefully consider accessibility implications when implementing custom styles.
Others share practical experiences and anecdotes about past struggles with styling
<select>, expressing relief that more customization will be possible. They discuss the workarounds they've had to employ, such as using JavaScript libraries to create custom select replacements, and anticipate that this change will simplify development.A recurring theme in the discussion is the desire for a balance between customizability and consistency. Commenters acknowledge the need for flexibility in styling to match different design requirements but also emphasize the importance of maintaining a recognizable and predictable user interface for the sake of usability. They suggest that developers should exercise restraint and prioritize user experience when customizing select elements.
Some comments delve into the technical details of the proposed changes, discussing the specific CSS properties and how they might be used. There is also discussion about browser compatibility and the potential for inconsistencies in implementation across different browsers.
A few commenters express skepticism about the necessity of extensive customization, arguing that the default select element is functional and sufficient in most cases. They suggest that excessive styling can lead to unnecessary complexity and potentially degrade the user experience.
Overall, the comments reflect a mix of excitement and apprehension about the ability to customize
<select>elements with CSS. While many welcome the increased flexibility, there's a clear understanding of the potential pitfalls and a shared concern for maintaining usability and accessibility. The discussion emphasizes the importance of thoughtful and responsible implementation of custom styles, prioritizing user experience over purely aesthetic considerations.