Stories with Tag Elixir

• Embedding Python in Elixir, It's Fine

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-25 12:53:15

  Verbose tl;dr

  The Dashbit blog post explores the practicality of embedding Python within an Elixir application using the erlport library. It demonstrates how to establish a connection to a Python process, execute Python code, and handle the results within Elixir. The author highlights the ease of setup and basic interaction, while acknowledging the performance limitations inherent in this approach, particularly the serialization overhead. While suitable for specific use cases like leveraging existing Python libraries or integrating with Python-based services, the post cautions against using it for performance-critical tasks. Instead, it recommends exploring alternative solutions like dedicated Python services or rewriting performance-sensitive code in Elixir for optimal integration.

  The blog post "Embedding Python in Elixir, It's Fine" by José Valim explores the practicality and nuances of integrating Python code within an Elixir application. Valim begins by acknowledging the common scenario where an existing Python library, offering specific functionality not readily available in Elixir, needs to be leveraged. He emphasizes that rewriting such a library in Elixir, while potentially desirable, might be impractical due to time or resource constraints.

  Valim then introduces the erlport library, a mechanism that enables communication between Erlang and Python, and by extension, Elixir and Python. He elaborates on the setup process, detailing how to install the necessary Python packages and establish a connection between the two languages. He highlights the importance of establishing this connection outside of the supervision tree due to the potential for Python crashes to impact the Elixir application's stability. This external process approach isolates the Python component and protects the main Elixir application from unforeseen issues.

  The core of the blog post revolves around practical examples demonstrating the interaction between Elixir and Python. Valim provides clear, concise code snippets illustrating how to call Python functions from Elixir and retrieve the results. He thoroughly explains the data conversion process, emphasizing that erlport handles the serialization and deserialization of data between the two languages. He specifically showcases how Elixir terms are converted into their Python equivalents, and vice versa, facilitating seamless data exchange.

  Further, the post addresses more advanced scenarios, like handling Python exceptions. Valim explains how Python errors are propagated back to Elixir and can be caught and managed using standard Elixir exception handling mechanisms. This allows developers to gracefully handle errors originating from the Python code within their Elixir application.

  Finally, the blog post acknowledges the performance implications of using erlport. While acknowledging that inter-process communication introduces some overhead, Valim argues that in many practical scenarios, the benefits of leveraging existing Python libraries outweigh the performance cost. He concludes by reassuring readers that embedding Python in Elixir is a viable and often efficient solution for integrating with existing Python codebases, providing a pragmatic approach to polyglot programming when rewriting entire libraries isn't feasible. He reiterates the importance of the external, supervised process approach for robust system design.

  • Elixir
  • Python
  • Interoperability
  • Embedding
  • Foreign Function Interface (FFI)
  • performance
  • Integration
  • Web Development
  • Backend Development
  • Software Development
  • Programming Languages

  Summary of Comments ( 29 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43171239

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss the practicality and potential benefits of embedding Python within Elixir applications. Several commenters highlight the performance implications, questioning whether the overhead introduced by the bridge outweighs the advantages of using Python libraries. One user suggests that using a separate Python service accessed via HTTP might be a simpler and more performant solution in many cases. Another points out that the real advantage lies in gradually integrating Python for specific tasks within an existing Elixir application, rather than building an entire system around this approach. Some discuss the potential usefulness for data science tasks, leveraging existing Python tools and libraries within an Elixir system. The maintainability and debugging aspects of such hybrid systems are also brought up as potential challenges. Several commenters also share their experiences with similar integration approaches using other languages.

  The Hacker News post "Embedding Python in Elixir, It's Fine" generated several comments discussing the merits and drawbacks of integrating Python and Elixir.

  One commenter questioned the long-term viability of such an approach, expressing concern about the added complexity of managing two different runtime environments and the potential difficulties in debugging and profiling. They argued that if a project requires significant Python integration, it might be more sensible to simply use Python for the entire project.

  Another commenter pointed out that Python's rich ecosystem of scientific and machine learning libraries is often the primary motivator for such integrations. They highlighted the benefit of leveraging existing Python code and tools within an Elixir application, especially in domains where Python excels.

  A counterpoint to this argument arose from a commenter who suggested that rewriting Python code in Elixir, while potentially time-consuming, could lead to better performance and maintainability in the long run. They acknowledged the initial investment required but emphasized the potential benefits of a unified codebase and the ability to fully leverage Elixir's concurrency features.

  Several commenters shared their own experiences with integrating Python and other languages into Elixir applications. One user recounted their successful implementation using Ports, a mechanism in Elixir for inter-process communication. Another commenter mentioned using a similar strategy for integrating R with Elixir, demonstrating that this concept is applicable beyond just Python.

  The discussion also touched on the performance implications of embedding Python. Some users cautioned that the overhead of inter-process communication could negate the performance advantages of Elixir, especially for high-throughput applications. Others suggested that the impact would vary depending on the specific use case and the nature of the interaction between Elixir and Python.

  One commenter mentioned alternative approaches to language integration, such as using a message queue like RabbitMQ. This approach could decouple the Elixir and Python components, potentially simplifying development and deployment, while also offering scalability benefits.

  Finally, there was some discussion around the tooling available for debugging and profiling mixed-language applications. One commenter lamented the relative lack of mature tools in this area, emphasizing the importance of robust logging and monitoring strategies when working with such integrations.

  Overall, the comments on Hacker News reflected a nuanced perspective on embedding Python in Elixir. While acknowledging the potential benefits of leveraging Python's libraries and existing code, commenters also highlighted the potential challenges related to complexity, performance, and debugging. The discussion emphasized the importance of carefully considering the trade-offs involved and choosing the right approach for each specific situation.

• Agent-Less System Monitoring with Elixir Broadway

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-18 14:53:44

  Verbose tl;dr

  This blog post demonstrates how to build an agent-less system monitoring tool using Elixir and Broadway. It leverages SSH to remotely execute commands on target machines, collecting metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk space. Broadway manages the concurrent execution of these commands across multiple hosts, providing scalability and fault tolerance. The collected data is then processed and displayed, offering a centralized overview of system performance. The author highlights the benefits of this approach, including simplified deployment (no agent installation required) and the inherent robustness of Elixir and its ecosystem. This method offers a lightweight yet powerful solution for monitoring server infrastructure.

  This blog post explores building a system monitoring solution using Elixir and Broadway, specifically focusing on an agent-less approach. The author argues that traditional agent-based monitoring, while offering granular data collection, introduces overhead and complexity through agent deployment and maintenance. Agent-less monitoring, leveraging protocols like SSH, offers a simplified alternative by querying systems directly without requiring resident software.

  The post begins by outlining the conceptual architecture of their solution. It details how Broadway, a concurrent and fault-tolerant processing library in Elixir, acts as the central processing engine. It receives monitoring tasks, distributes them to designated workers, and manages the results. Crucially, the chosen agent-less method utilizes SSH to execute commands remotely on target systems. The post emphasizes Broadway's robustness in handling potentially unreliable network operations inherent in SSH-based communication.

  The author then delves into the implementation specifics. They demonstrate setting up a Broadway pipeline configured to process monitoring tasks. These tasks are structured as messages containing the target hostname and the command to execute. The implementation leverages Erlang's SSH application to establish connections and execute commands remotely. A critical component highlighted is the error handling mechanism built around Broadway's retry and failure handling capabilities. This ensures resilience against transient network issues or temporary unavailability of target systems. The retrieved monitoring data is then processed and formatted, ready for storage or visualization.

  A key advantage emphasized is the flexibility afforded by this approach. The system can be readily extended to support various monitoring commands and metrics. Adding new systems to monitor only requires configuring the necessary connection details, without deploying any agents. The post also touches upon the scalability of the solution. Broadway's concurrent processing model allows for parallel execution of monitoring tasks, improving efficiency and reducing overall monitoring time. The author acknowledges potential security considerations associated with managing SSH credentials and advocates for secure storage and access control mechanisms.

  Finally, the post concludes by reiterating the benefits of the agent-less approach, highlighting its simplicity, scalability, and reduced overhead. It positions this approach as a compelling alternative to traditional agent-based solutions, especially in scenarios where agent deployment is impractical or undesirable. The author suggests potential future enhancements, such as integrating with different data visualization tools and exploring alternative agent-less protocols.

  • Elixir
  • Broadway
  • System Monitoring
  • Agentless Monitoring
  • Observability
  • DevOps
  • distributed systems
  • Erlang
  • OTP
  • concurrency
  • fault tolerance
  • scalability
  • performance monitoring
  • Real-Time Monitoring

  Summary of Comments ( 16 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43090167

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the practicality and benefits of the agentless approach to system monitoring described in the linked blog post. Several commenters appreciated the simplicity and reduced overhead of not needing to install agents on monitored machines. Some raised concerns about potential security implications of running commands remotely via SSH and the potential performance bottlenecks of doing so. Others questioned the scalability of this method, particularly for large numbers of monitored systems. The discussion also touched on alternative approaches like using message queues and the potential benefits of Elixir's concurrency features for this type of monitoring system. A compelling comment suggested exploring the use of OSquery for efficient data gathering, which prompted further discussion on its pros and cons. Finally, some commenters expressed interest in the author's open-sourcing of their project.

  The Hacker News post titled "Agent-Less System Monitoring with Elixir Broadway" sparked a small but focused discussion with 5 comments. No single comment overwhelmingly dominated the conversation, but several offered interesting perspectives on the article's topic.

  One commenter questioned the term "agent-less," pointing out that while the system described doesn't require installing dedicated agent software on monitored machines, it still relies on SSH access, which functionally acts like an agent. They argued that this approach trades one set of tradeoffs (agent installation and maintenance) for another (managing SSH keys and potential security concerns).

  Another comment focused on the choice of Erlang/Elixir for this type of task. They acknowledged the platform's strengths in concurrency and distributed systems but expressed concern about the operational overhead and debugging complexity compared to simpler scripting solutions, especially for smaller deployments. They suggested that the benefits of Elixir might become more pronounced with larger and more complex monitoring setups.

  A third commenter praised the article's clear explanation and the elegant approach to building a robust monitoring system with Broadway. They highlighted the benefits of leveraging Elixir's OTP framework for handling failures and ensuring reliability.

  The remaining comments were shorter and less substantive. One simply expressed appreciation for the article, while another briefly mentioned using a similar approach with a different technology.

  Overall, the comments section, while brief, provided some thoughtful critiques and perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed agent-less monitoring approach using Elixir and Broadway. The discussion centered on the practical implications of SSH as an "agent" substitute and the suitability of Elixir/OTP for this kind of task in different scales of deployment.