Inherited wealth is increasingly rivaling earned income in importance, especially in advanced economies. As populations age and accumulated wealth grows, inheritances are becoming larger and more frequent, flowing disproportionately to the already wealthy. This exacerbates inequality, entrenches existing class structures, and potentially undermines the meritocratic ideal of social mobility based on hard work. The article argues that governments need to address this trend through policies like inheritance taxes, not just to raise revenue, but to promote fairness and opportunity across generations.
The Economist article, "Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as working," posits a concerning societal shift wherein inherited wealth is increasingly rivaling earned income in its significance for individual financial well-being. The piece meticulously explores the growing disparity between generations, highlighting how younger cohorts face a dramatically different economic landscape compared to their predecessors. Specifically, it argues that accumulating wealth through traditional employment is becoming progressively more challenging, while the transfer of assets across generations, primarily through inheritance, is playing an ever-larger role in determining financial security and overall prosperity.
This trend, the article elaborates, is fueled by several interconnected factors. Firstly, it identifies the substantial appreciation of asset prices, particularly in real estate and equities, over the past few decades. This boom has disproportionately benefited older generations who entered these markets earlier, accumulating considerable wealth that they are now poised to bequeath. Secondly, the article points to demographic shifts, including increased longevity and declining birth rates, which concentrate wealth within fewer heirs. Simultaneously, wages for younger generations have not kept pace with the rising cost of living, further exacerbating the wealth gap and making independent wealth accumulation through employment a more arduous undertaking.
The article goes on to explore the multifaceted implications of this evolving dynamic. It notes the potential for increased social stratification and reduced economic mobility, as those born into affluent families enjoy a considerable head start, while those from less privileged backgrounds struggle to gain a foothold. Furthermore, the article touches on the potential ramifications for economic dynamism and innovation, suggesting that a society where inherited wealth plays such a prominent role may discourage entrepreneurial risk-taking and perpetuate existing inequalities. The reliance on inheritance, it argues, could lead to a less dynamic and meritocratic economy, potentially hindering overall growth and prosperity. The article concludes by underscoring the urgency of addressing this complex issue through policy interventions aimed at promoting fairer wealth distribution, increasing opportunities for younger generations, and ensuring a more equitable and sustainable economic future. These interventions, the article suggests, might include reforms to inheritance taxation, investments in education and skills development, and policies designed to promote wage growth and affordable housing.
Summary of Comments ( 546 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213143
HN commenters largely agree with the premise that inherited wealth is increasingly important for financial success. Several highlight the difficulty of accumulating wealth through work alone, especially given rising housing costs and stagnant wages. Some discuss the societal implications, expressing concern over decreased social mobility and the potential for inherited wealth to exacerbate inequality. Others offer personal anecdotes illustrating the impact of inheritance, both positive and negative. The role of luck and privilege is a recurring theme, with some arguing that meritocracy is a myth and that inherited advantages play a larger role than often acknowledged. A few commenters point out potential flaws in the Economist's analysis, questioning the data or suggesting alternative interpretations.
The Hacker News post "Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as working" sparked a lively discussion with a variety of perspectives on the increasing role of inheritance in wealth accumulation. Several commenters agreed with the premise, pointing to the rising cost of living, particularly housing, and stagnant wages making it nearly impossible for younger generations to amass wealth at the same rate as their predecessors. They argued that inheritance is becoming a necessary leg up, not just a bonus, for many to achieve financial stability, let alone prosperity. The concept of "unearned wealth" and its societal implications were also debated.
Some users challenged the article's assertions, questioning the methodology and data presented. They argued that the article oversimplified a complex issue and didn't adequately account for factors like differing savings rates, investment strategies, and entrepreneurial endeavors. One commenter suggested that the article focused too much on Western economies and overlooked the global picture.
A significant portion of the discussion revolved around the fairness and ethical implications of inherited wealth. Some commenters advocated for policy changes, such as higher inheritance taxes, to address wealth inequality and promote social mobility. They argued that inherited wealth perpetuates a system where opportunities and outcomes are heavily influenced by family background rather than merit. Others defended inheritance as a legitimate form of intergenerational wealth transfer, emphasizing the importance of family support and the right to bequeath assets to loved ones.
The discussion also touched upon the broader economic and social consequences of rising wealth inequality, including its potential impact on social cohesion, political stability, and economic growth. Several commenters expressed concerns about the long-term effects of a society where inherited wealth plays such a significant role in determining life outcomes.
Finally, a few commenters shared personal anecdotes about their own experiences with inheritance, offering nuanced perspectives on the emotional and financial complexities involved. Some described the relief and opportunities afforded by inheritance, while others reflected on the challenges and responsibilities that come with it.