Jim Conroy reflects on the tangible benefits of handwriting first drafts. He finds that physically writing slows him down, forcing more deliberate thought and careful crafting of sentences. This process also helps him detach from the distractions of the digital world, fostering deeper focus and more creative exploration of ideas. While acknowledging the eventual need for digital tools, Conroy advocates for the initial act of writing on paper as a way to improve the quality and clarity of thought before transitioning to the computer. He views this method as a valuable practice for refining writing and enriching the overall creative process.
In a blog post entitled "Blogging on Paper," author Jason Conroy meticulously details his personal experiment in eschewing digital writing tools in favor of a more analog, tactile approach to blogging. He outlines a fascinating, self-imposed challenge of composing blog entries entirely by hand, employing the traditional medium of pen and paper as the primary instruments of his creative process. This deliberate departure from the ubiquitous digital workflow, typically involving keyboards, screens, and software, stems from Mr. Conroy's desire to explore the potential benefits of a slower, more deliberate method of composition. He posits that this intentional deceleration of the writing process might cultivate a greater degree of thoughtfulness and precision in his prose.
The author painstakingly describes the multi-stage procedure he has adopted. First, he drafts his blog posts longhand on ruled paper, utilizing a fountain pen as his chosen writing implement. This initial phase allows for the free flow of ideas and the gradual refinement of his thoughts. Upon completion of the handwritten draft, Mr. Conroy then meticulously revises and edits his work, again on paper, further honing his language and ensuring clarity of expression. Finally, in a concession to the realities of online publishing, he transcribes the finalized handwritten version into digital format using a text editor, thus preparing the content for online dissemination.
Mr. Conroy elaborates on the perceived advantages of this unconventional approach. He suggests that the physical act of writing by hand fosters a deeper connection with the material, encouraging more focused attention and potentially sparking new avenues of thought. He contrasts this with the perceived ease and speed of digital composition, which, he argues, can sometimes lead to a less considered and potentially more superficial treatment of the subject matter. Furthermore, he speculates that the inherent limitations of paper, the absence of readily available editing tools like backspace or copy-paste, necessitate a greater degree of forethought and planning during the writing process. This constraint, in his view, can ultimately contribute to a more concise and carefully crafted final product. He concludes his post by reflecting on the overall experience, offering a thoughtful meditation on the interplay between writing method and creative output.
Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859564
Hacker News commenters generally praised the author's paper-based blogging workflow for its focus and lack of distractions. Several pointed out the similarities to the Zettelkasten method of note-taking, appreciating the tangible and deliberate nature of the process. Some questioned the practicality and scalability of the system, particularly for tasks like editing and sharing, while others suggested digital tools like a remarkable tablet or OCR software could bridge the gap between paper and digital publishing. A few comments also highlighted the romantic and nostalgic appeal of handwriting and physical notebooks.
The Hacker News post titled "Blogging on Paper" (linking to conroy.org/blogging-on-paper) has generated a moderate amount of discussion. Several commenters express admiration for the author's dedication to a slower, more deliberate form of writing and publishing.
One commenter appreciates the tangible nature of the process and the enforced limitations, suggesting it encourages more thoughtful writing compared to the ease and speed of digital platforms. They also highlight the permanence and archival quality of physical copies.
Another commenter focuses on the aesthetic appeal of typewriters and handwritten notes, drawing a comparison to the beauty and tactile experience of vinyl records compared to digital music. They see this method as a rejection of the ephemeral nature of much online content.
A few commenters discuss the practicality of the approach, acknowledging the significant time investment required for transcription and layout. One suggests that the effort involved might actually hinder consistent output.
Some commenters share their own experiences with similar analog methods, including using notebooks for drafting and revising. One recounts using a typewriter for university assignments and appreciates the focus it provided.
A thread develops around the tools and techniques involved in the paper-based blogging process, with commenters discussing different typewriter models, inks, and paper types. This exchange showcases a shared interest in the craft and materiality of writing.
Several commenters express interest in trying a similar approach, even if only for personal journaling or short-form writing. They see the value in disconnecting from the distractions of the digital world and embracing a more focused, intentional writing practice.
While there's no outright negativity, some comments express skepticism about the scalability and long-term feasibility of the method, particularly for maintaining a regular blog. The general sentiment, however, leans towards appreciation for the author's unique approach and the values it represents.